Jesus, people need to realize that just because a better player was picked later in the draft that it was a bad pick.
29 other teams had a chance to draft Ludnqvist, and Callahan, and Stepan. Just because they might have picked someone not as good doesn't mean it was a bad pick.
Someone posted a few days ago, that outside the top few picks, only like half/a third of all 1st rounders become full time NHLers
If McI becomes an NHL defenseman, he was a good pick
In simpler terms: you can't expect your team to get the best player every draft. Technically, they should get the best player every 30 drafts
Silly argument. Incredibly silly argument. I'm sorry, just equating Lundqvist, Callahan, and Stepan to this situation is a JOKE. First of all, only one of those 3 is as good or better as what Tarasenko can become. Second, more importantly, none of these guys were highly touted. Tarasenko was highly touted and fell due to the Russian factor. I'm sorry that's not a good enough reason to pass on a guy with that skill. We took Cherepanov in the first round. This guy had better skill. Also, unlike what one poster said Cherepanov's death was something that never happens, so THAT'S not an excuse either.