- Jan 11, 2006
- 13,738
- 6,979
They made the right call.Yes, they exposed McQuaid. They had three defensemen for one spot to protect (doubtful Vegas would have taken McQuaid of Kevan Miller), they went with Kevan Miller over Colin.
They made the right call.Yes, they exposed McQuaid. They had three defensemen for one spot to protect (doubtful Vegas would have taken McQuaid of Kevan Miller), they went with Kevan Miller over Colin.
I still can't believe we gave him away for nothing. And that's not hindsight, I said it before it happened.
One of Sweeney's worst moves.
They made the right call.
Spilled milk and all but I disagree. Vegas wasn't drafting contracts, no way they take Killer and his 3 years.
Then fine. They took someone else. There was really no one else left unprotected that I gave a **** about.
Meanwhile I watched Kevan Miller get exposed in a 2nd round again while Colin Miller played well on route to the Stanley Cup Final.
I'm not ant-Kevan Miller, I like him, you just don't give up young good defenseman for nothing to protect a guy like Kevan Miller.
Just for fun ( I would have kept Miller as well) but would anyone have been on board for giving Miller the contract he just signed as a 3rd liner?
I'm a huge Sweeney guy, but protecting Kevan over Colin was one of my four issues I have with his tenure thus far.
Personally I would have exposed Quaider, he might not have been taken for one, and two wasn’t he a health scratch quite a bit this past season?
Krug is far better than Colin Miller.Colin Miller is what Bruins fans think Krug is.
An overpayed 3rd pairing PP specialist.
I'd much rather pay a million less for Kevan Miller.
Krug is far better than Colin Miller.
Colin Miller’s issues are between his ears.
He was overpaid and the Bruins protected the right guys.
Colin Miller is overrated and was overpaid.
Pretty much.41 points is a down year for Krug.
McQuaid was exposed to Vegas. They just didn't take him.
I'm a huge Sweeney guy, but protecting Kevan over Colin was one of my four issues I have with his tenure thus far.
In a related note, Pagnotta is saying that McPhee is offering a large package including CMiller to Ottawa for Karlsson:
Interesting read - Karlsson trade talks reaching climax
Then fine. They took someone else. There was really no one else left unprotected that I gave a **** about.
Meanwhile I watched Kevan Miller get exposed in a 2nd round again while Colin Miller played well on route to the Stanley Cup Final.
I'm not ant-Kevan Miller, I like him, you just don't give up young good defenseman for nothing to protect a guy like Kevan Miller.
Amazing how Chiller went from and 80% like rate to 10% in one year around here.
We pump the tires of our 7 assist second pairing D continually, yet Chiller lights it up for Vegas, part a 6 man Stanley cup appearing corps and gets a sub 4 million dollar contract and he's a bum.
That's a good take. I predicted when he was here he would eventually become a top 4 D based on his offensive potential. That's where he was the following season. He is only 25 and has had one full season of playing all the games. I think his offensive game will continue to improve, but he really needs to up his defensive game. He was a mess in the playoffs defensively. He took dumb as hell penalties at bad times. Got beat repeatedly on D. Was just plain lost at times. He was basically a liability in his own end and clearly Gallant recognized that and tried to shelter him. At this point he is not as good as Krug in either end. That doesn't mean he's trash, but he truly does have to be in the right situation to be an effective top 4 D due to his still developing defensive game. DS made his decision based on team needs at the time. The team just really didn't have a slot for him at the time based on his skill set/liabilities. I agree with you that he wouldn't have developed into what we see now had he stayed in Boston due to the situation. Parting ways has worked out really well for Chiller, and in my mind hasn't hurt Boston since they have a puck moving D-man on all three lines. And all three of those puck moving D-men are better than Chiller defensively.I was one of Chiller’s biggest backers here and I wish they had protected him. That said, let’s not pretend he’s something he’s not. I thought he was good offensively for Vegas this year, both playoffs and regular season, but he’s still an absolute train wreck in his own end.
He was 5th for TOI in the playoffs (by a decent margin) among the Knight’s D and 6th during the regular season. He’s a 3rd pair PP specialist that wasn’t going to get PP time in Boston with Krug and McAvoy in front of him. Krug played only a minute more a game than Chiller (primarily on the PP) but out-produced him by 19 pts. 54% of Chiller’s output was on the PP (22/41), while Krug was around 41% (24/59).
So, I guess what I’m trying to say is that where Chiller was the most effective (the PP) was something that he wasn’t going to be doing in Boston, so we never would have seen that here. Instead, we would have seen the 16-17 minute per game guy that was bad in his own end with limited ES production.