I'd be shocked if this wasn't at least partially a favor to Clifford. The Marlies play in an NHL building, are treated closer to NHL players than any other AHL affiliate, are part of an organization Clifford is familiar with, and are just a couple hours from his home town. I think he has a more realistic chance of getting back to the NHL in Toronto than he does here as well.
This organization moved on from him (rightfully so). I'll take every forward on the current roster over him without question. Come playoff time, I'd take Nieghbours over him as well once his junior season is over. If I were in Army's shoes and being brutally honest with Clifford, I'd have told him that if he is a good soldier in Springfield, stays in shape and doesn't continue his decline, then his best chance of playing playoff games for this team would be if we suffer 3 concurrent injuries (or 2 concurrent injuries plus trading a forward). On top of that, the cap situation means that barring an emergency callup, we almost certainly won't be able to call him up mid-season for short-term fill ins. And there is the distinct possibility that he is passed on the depth chart by another AHL guy between now and April since Joshua and Mac will get NHL looks before him.
I think you owe a vet like Clifford that honesty and I can't blame him for hearing it and saying "if you can get me to a better situation for me personally, I'd appreciate it." Given our organizational depth, I think that a quality organization sees if they can honor that. While his "best case" scenario is that he is 14th on our depth chart in raw ability, I'm more than comfortable looking at Joshua and MacMac as at least purely lateral plug ins. The cap situation means that those two would have been the mid-season call ups over Clifford so long as Perunovich is in the NHL. Realistically, Clifford became the 16th forward on the in-season depth chart and was no higher than 15th for the playoff depth chart. The reputation gain of "doing right by a vet" and getting him to a better spot for his career outweighs the organizational advantage of holding on to a 15th/16th forward and killing any remnants of his NHL career. If we are in a situation where we are relying on our 16th forward at the NHL level, guys as good as Clifford are available on waivers for a short term solution.
This was the right thing to do for the player and the odds of it tangibly harming the team are less than 1%. We also get the advantage of not paying a guy a $1.25M salary to play in the NHL in a year where attendance is fairly soft. Probably worth noting that
his agent represents a good chunk of bottom 6 and 4th line talent who are generally sub-$1M UFAs who choose destinations based on roster fit and organizational trust. This is one of those moves that may help you land a depth piece in the future when that agent praises your organization. This is a good thing for the player, a good thing for ownership's bank accounts and a good thing for the front office reputation around the league. The downside is simply losing a player who is wholly redundant until we suffer 4+ simultaneous injuries. I'll take my chances that we either don't suffer those injuries or can find a suitable replacement on waivers if those injuries come.