Bob would've been my choice, it's wild Forsling had more votes than him. Bob had 3 stinkers in the finals? McD also went pointless in 3 and was a non-factor in another. That's a wash as far as I'm concerned. McD won game 5? Bob won game 1. If it's splitsies, you award it to the winning team. But I mean, w/e.Someone should tell Yohe to log off. Dude is embarrassing himself on Twitter. McDavid had twenty(!) more points than Barkov - Florida's leading scorer. He was also the catalyst for the Oilers evening the series.
I mean, they probably will, given the reasons you listed. The Pacific is a cakewalk.I don't expect the Oilers to be back to the finals again
Someone should tell Yohe to log off. Dude is embarrassing himself on Twitter. McDavid had twenty(!) more points than Barkov - Florida's leading scorer. He was also the catalyst for the Oilers evening the series.
You had me at "Someone should tell Yohe to log off."Someone should tell Yohe to log off. Dude is embarrassing himself on Twitter. McDavid had twenty(!) more points than Barkov - Florida's leading scorer. He was also the catalyst for the Oilers evening the series.
You can’t deny the productivity and absurd numbers he put up. However, he was not the catalyst for the series comeback, though. Edmonton’s depth and role players finally stepped up and Skinner had the week of his life. Most of McDavid’s points came after the games were essentially already secured.Someone should tell Yohe to log off. Dude is embarrassing himself on Twitter. McDavid had twenty(!) more points than Barkov - Florida's leading scorer. He was also the catalyst for the Oilers evening the series.
You can’t deny the productivity and absurd numbers he put up. However, he was not the catalyst for the series comeback, though. Edmonton’s depth and role players finally stepped up and Skinner had the week of his life. Most of McDavid’s points came after the games were essentially already secured.
Regardless and as usual
It is revisionist history to claim McDavid carried the Oilers to game 7. He played a part but it was fully a team effort.McDavid had 8 points in 2 games. How much more can you be "the catalyst"?
He disappeared in G6 and G7, but Penguins fans trying to level that against him and what Sid has done in his SCF appearances is bizarre, revisionist history.
It is revisionist history to claim McDavid carried the Oilers to game 7. He played a part but it was fully a team effort.
Where have I compared him to Sid? You seem to be the one stuck on it.I mean it's hockey. McDavid's SCF this year was more impressive then anything Sid has done in his career outside in a similar circumstance outside of the 2017 SCF.
We also seem to have forgotten Sid got blasted in his first SCF too. Way worse than McDavid did.
Where have I compared him to Sid? You seem to be the one stuck on it.
No, I was responding to @BHD post about McDavid being the catalyst to Edmonton’s comeback because I happen to disagree with that. I don’t give a rat’s ass what Josh Yohe thinks. I value Hair guy’s opinion equally to his.You were responding to Yohe's tweet which is obviously trying to find fault's in McDavid's historic performance.
I don't understand why we need to tear down what is literally a top 5 playoff run of all time from an individual contributor.
McDavid did everything he could to win.
Someone should tell Yohe to log off. Dude is embarrassing himself on Twitter. McDavid had twenty(!) more points than Barkov - Florida's leading scorer. He was also the catalyst for the Oilers evening the series.
How can you be the MVP when you put up goose eggs in the 2 most important games of the season?
If McDavid even had an assist in 1 of those games, I guess I could see it if you squint hard enough.
But they need to change the definition of the trophy and just do an "Art Ross of the playoffs" if it's going to go the leader in points.
Bob was the MVP of the winning team. To me, that fits the definition of the the Conn Smythe vs leading point getter
Because it's about the entire playoffs. Not two games in the finals. He had 42 points and broke the assist record in the playoffs.
That's a fair way to look at it even if I disagree with it.
You're not very valuable if you are invisible during the 2 most important games of the year. That's my opinion.
Because it's about the entire playoffs. Not two games in the finals. He had 42 points and broke the assist record in the playoffs.
This, and nobody on Florida was good for the entire playoffs. Maybe Barkov, but that's it.
It’s overIt’s so weird how many Penguins fans can’t accept McDavid is doing Mario Lemieux level things and the conversation between Sid and him as comparable individual contributors is simply over.
If they secured the sweep it would have been Bob. His numbers took a big hit in the next 3 games. No Panther fully standing out made it a pretty easy decision to give it to McDavid.This, and nobody on Florida was good for the entire playoffs. Maybe Barkov, but that's it.
It’s over
He had 2 big games, one where all his points came when it was already 3-1 his team
Crosby is finished
View attachment 886990
That’s fine. He’s been healthier in a higher scoring era, good for him.It's more the fact that he's going to hit 1000 points potentially faster than any player not named Lemieux / Gretzky.
He has a better trophy case then Sid outside of the Cup.
And he has broken a Gretzky record in the playoffs.