Forge
Blissfully Mediocre
Cap space is tight enough this season, I don't think I want to spend what we have on Saad with an extra year next season.
Around the NHL 2024-25 regular season
- Thread starter NJDevs26
- Start date
Brodie and martinez have been good in chi. Certainly both better than Trouba
Chi's problem at this point is their forward core. They can't finish for shit and bedard hasn't taken the step they've needed him to
Forgetting about 8 million dollars in that calculation.
You tell me, we had to pay 5 mill for a 30 point wayne simmonds.
I think a good agent will use any and all comps available if they can.
You valued trouba as a positive on this contract or you thought this player was worth this in UFA.
- Dec 20, 2018
- 23,018
- 51,939
They weren’t getting Pesce, Roy or Montour. Who knows what players they tried but failed to signed.
Not sure some of a 30 year old on a lengthy deal is the right player for them right now anyway.
And short term they should have gotten two older, now bad defensemen, because why?
The 34 year old cooked Brodie is on the Hawks 3rd pair and the 37 year old Martinez is injured. Boy did the Ducks miss out there.
Trouba costs 6m in actual salary. The cap hit is meaningless to the Ducks next year.
They need cap flexibility for when they need to start paying their players.
Why does it have to be a lengthy deal?
I was told about 100 times the cap and money doesn't matter, just getting a good player.
I value all of those guys at LEAST 2-3 mill more than trouba.
You go offer them a 2 year deal at a massive AAV a la Orlov in Carolina (except bigger if you need to) before you take trouba at 8.
I'd rather have Brett Pesce at 12x2 than Trouba at 8x2.
I know saying really big numbers mill is scary in UFA for some reason, but let me ask you a question.
Would you give up the next 2 years of Brett Pesce for a 75% retained Jacob Trouba?
$5M for one year. I guarantee Simmonds had lots of longer deals that would've ultimately netted him far more money that he passed on to sign that one.
The thing is that Trouba does stuff that almost nobody does in this league anymore. He hurts people on purpose. Not a ton of that going around.
The thing you seem to be missing in this is that min-maxing as the Ducks isn't going to get them into the playoffs or anywhere close. They're 12th in the Conference and effectively 7 points out of a playoff spot right now. Where does Pesce at 12M get them over the nothing/Trouba they've been using? A win better? Okay so they're 5 points out - hooray.
Orlov took the huge short deal in Carolina. Carolina was coming off a trip to the Conference Finals. The Ducks haven't made the playoffs in 6 years. It's going to be 7 after this one.
- Dec 20, 2018
- 23,018
- 51,939
Orlov went to a great team. Klingberg tried that
trick with Anaheim and how did that work out?
And Klingberg only did that out of desperation on July 29. The guys you mentioned got the 6-7 year deals they wanted on July 1.
If I was any of those defensemen I would take those longer deals over a short term deal with a shit team everytime.
Their numbers would take a huge hit on a team with bad team defense. That would make getting a good contract in the future potentially much more difficult.
For example, Montour’s career was derailed by playing on a shit Buffalo squad before being revived in Florida.
With Montour Florida got a guy who scored 73 points for them on a 3 year/3.5m deal because he came from a team where careers, particularly for defensemen, go to die.
Let me ask you a question, why the hell would Brett Pesce sign a 2 year deal with the Ducks? To make a few more bucks over those 2 years?
I don’t believe we were the highest bidder with him, so I don’t see how that sort of offer would matter. He wanted to come back to Tri-State area and wants to win.
Well, if you never make any moves that help you get out of the dumpster, you'll stay there forever, and people will keep making excuses for why it's okay that you haven't spent money well because it doesn't matter.
In terms of Pesce? Multiple wins of value and just look at what he's done as a partner for Luke Hughes.
You know how NJD made the playoffs in 22-23?
By being effective with the money and assets they spent.
Graves.
Siegenthaler.
Marino.
Hamilton.
Every good move you make gets you slightly closer to being a good team again. If you don't hold a GM to the standard of making effective, +value moves, then you'll accept being shit for a while.
- Dec 20, 2018
- 23,018
- 51,939
Remember that we got Graves and Siegenthaler thanks to the Seattle expansion draft in July 2021. You could protect 3 defensemen:
Colorado: Girard, Makar, Toews
Washington: Carlson, Orlov, Trevor Van Riemsdyk
New Jersey: Severson, Graves, Siegenthaler
But People don’t have to defend every move the Ducks make in order to defend the Trouba move here.
I’m sure they could do some things better but Trouba isn’t a bad move in itself. They need RHD. They have a lot of young PMD and Trouba brings a different element, experience and leadership.
Other teams, like Columbus, wanted Trouba too. The Rangers were never going to have an issue dumping him if they could get him agree to go.
Yeah, I know how the Devils made the playoffs in 22-23 - do you know how they missed them in the previous 4 seasons, all of them by quite a lot? By not having enough young, effective talent. Shero tried to build a team on top of a pile of sand in 2019 and Nico, Jack, Bratt, and Zacha were just not quite there yet.
The Devils spent the pick they got from trading Andy Greene for Graves, they spent the 3rd rounder from the Hall trade on Siegenthaler, and they spent a 3rd and their former 1st round pick from 2018 on Marino. Part of why they felt comfortable making these moves is that they had a surplus of draft picks from 2020.
So yeah, I grant that the Ducks should be farther along in their rebuild than they are, and that they're rebuilding quite poorly, and probably making bad decisions at the draft table besides. They're still really, really bad and even three efficient moves isn't going to change that.
Do you believe seattle (WITHOUT montour) is meaningfully better than Anaheim? I don't.
And perhaps if you make better moves in the past, you can slowly get yourself out of being a shithole nobody wants to sign with.
Moves have got to start somewhere. Anaheim is likely working with a limited budget, so money poorly spent imo is even MORE wasteful.
Also, I'm sorry but this "we can't get anyone to sign" is a weak excuse. If you can't negotiate to attract free agents, you need a new GM.
Look how AZ+Utah built their dcore from shit as an undesirable location.
+EV move to find Durzi
+EV move to find Vaalimaki
Grabbing an elite D with 8.5 mill in sergachev.
And grabbing a marino
stopgaps as guys like Cole and Maataa who aren't ridiculous AAVs
And as the prospects come in and improve, they come into a quality core that ALSO has a future attached with it.
Look at NJD
+EV move to find siegs
+EV move to grab graves
+EV move to grab Marino
Using the big space not to pay for a trouba, but to get a Dougie f***ing Hamilton.
And that hand built core (not the prospects), is what brought us to the playoffs.
And then as the prospects come in they came into a competent core that ALSO had a future attached to it.
Yeah, Verbeek grabbed klingberg. A bad choice. If he had made an effective choice maybe they'd be in a better spot today. Maybe going after the right Strome brother (or both) would have him in a much better spot today.
Personally, I'd rather make the Hamilton move than the Subban move. Sometimes you gotta take a risk and offer some term
Speaking of CBJ, a guy they should have tried to grab instead of trouba was Fabbro. There's a +EV move right there
Yes, Shero was the one grabbing the Troubas (PK Subban).
- Apr 20, 2005
- 2,830
- 1,851
Sorry, I should rephrase.
Speaking of CBJ, a guy Anaheim should have tried to grab instead of trouba was Fabbro (who CBJ grabbed smartly).
That move is going to accelerate things for them. Unfortunate that Jiricek was so impatient tho.
Although tbf Christianson, Johnson, and Harris had no business being in the lineup over him, so he has a point.
The biggest thing the Trouba move does, fwiw, is almost certainly keep the Ducks above the salary floor, which they were in danger of being below after the trade deadline. While it might've been possible for them to trade for something like Backstrom or Oshie, this at least gives them a roster player and something that might be worth something next year.
In the reality where the Devils sign a Hamilton-level player in 2019, how does that ultimately help NJ? They finished way below the playoffs for the next 3 seasons. They even wasted Dougie's first season (albeit he was awful when he came back from the jaw injury).
In the reality where the Devils sign a Hamilton-level player in 2019, how does that ultimately help NJ? They finished way below the playoffs for the next 3 seasons. They even wasted Dougie's first season (albeit he was awful when he came back from the jaw injury).
Emperoreddy
Show Me What You Got!
You don't have to grab a Hamilton every specific year.
You just don't ever grab a Subban or a Trouba. Too old for upside, too expensive to be valuable, and especially when you have to trade for them
So Carolina took Brent Burns with 3 years left - yes they got SJ to retain, but that was a similar idea - bad move, I take it. I think it's somewhat fatuous to compare the Subban and Trouba trades even if I was the one who started it - Subban was clearly worth something to teams when he was moved, Trouba was not, he was basically waived with the Rangers taking on Vaakaninanen for the cost of a 4th round pick.
There's some mitigation of risk when you trade for a deal like those, where the endpoint is within view. A big signing can absolutely go sideways in a worse way, as we're seeing with Stamkos and Marchessault so far.
"They got SJ to retain"
Simple as that.
You cannot just gloss over him being retained down to 5.3 mill.
If you're paying a 4th to dump a guy you resigned as a UFA (the only UFA he was able to convince to sign btw) on a fully buriable contract, once again you need a better GM.
Big signing of a 34 year old and 33 year old in nash.
Speaking of that, weird how old a lot of Verbeek's UFA targets and trade have been for a rebuilding/tanking team. Again limiting upside and long term viability.
Hamilton was 28.
You don't seem to understand that Anaheim is not operating under the salary cap as you see it. Vaakanainen being on a buriable contract doesn't matter. They don't need to bury him. There's even theoretical worlds where, without Trouba, him being buried would've put the Ducks under the floor later in the season. They wanted his money gone and that's what they got for a 4th.
Also he was a non-tender signing, as is standard now with arbitration-eligible fringe guys around the league.
Wild how it manages to flip flop every second from money mattering when dumping Vaak vs not mattering whenever convenient to justify a decision such as taking on trouba.
Also, if you make a signing that you have to pay to dump before we even hit the new year, especially of a guy who you've SEEN in your org for multiple years now and YOU targeted as a piece in the most significant decisiom of your GM tenure, the selling off of a prime aged top pair dman (after failing to resign him), that once again does not speak well to you as a GM.
Trouba's cap hit is higher than his AAV. The Ducks are going to try to flush all their UFAs at the end of the season, doubt they get any takers on Fabbri, but Vatrano is gone, and someone will probably try to take Dumoulin and McGinn. As constituted, the Ducks are $5M above the salary floor. Even if the Ducks retain 50% of all 3 of these guys I mentioned, that's about $4.8M, replace them with 900k players, that's $2.1M, leaving a difference of $2.7M. Without Trouba's $8M, they are well below the floor. There's very obviously other solutions than Trouba to this problem, but he represents a fairly convenient one in that he is actually playing hockey right now and is available.
I agree that it's not good management, but sometimes things go sideways between a player and a coach. I do not think he was a particularly valuable piece in the Lindholm deal, which also included 3 top 64 selections.
I refuse to give credit to a GM who makes a bad more to try and make up/deal with the aftermath for his previous bad moves/failures.
If anything the fact that he was forced to do this by those past failures makes those past failures even worse.
JrFischer54
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2017
- 10,979
- 4,582
I was just going to post about firing lav. Not sure if it’s totally his fault but they have to try something.
