LETS GO CHUCKIE!
Or JimmyI don't know about you but when you let that 7 foot goon score on you it may not be a good day.
Or Panarin..
A couple softies really sunk them. Somehow still significantly better than Georgiev though.Chuckie isn't gonna win many games with a 871sv%
Bold strategy, CottonHas anyone told Georgiev he should try getting in front of the puck?
chuckie was the only reason they were in that game for as long as they wereI don't know about you but when you let that 7 foot goon score on you it may not be a good day.
Or Panarin..
Or Jimmy V..
chuckie was the only reason they were in that game for as long as they were
he has more playoff goals than kyrou has the past 2 seasonsJoshua 2+1 6 shots 17:48 TOI.
Well done Army.
![]()
Its really shame we let him walk. Didn't see his potential.
I don't mind watching Dizzee's idiotic antics bite him, but I take no pleasure in seeing Charlie Lindgren lose. I wish the guy nothing but the best. That said, I predicted a series sweep and I'm sticking to it.
The bolded is such a bad faith argument because here’s what happens on this board: people use the same go-to lines to try to shut people up who make those claims. If someone complains that a bottom of the lineup player isn’t getting enough playing time, everyone says “well they’re not going to be a difference maker anyways so who cares.” Then people stop talking about it because nobody is willing to engage in convos about those players. And when that player then breaks out elsewhere, those same people say “WeLl I dIdN’t NoTiCe AnYoNe PrEdIcTiNg ThIs WoUlD hApPeN!!!”Monday's question: are we overrating the actual stat line and then-projected future potential of Dakota Joshua and what he "obviously" would have done here if put on the NHL roster for a full season, or is this a sign that the much-vaunted scouting staff, especially the pro scouting staff, isn't as good as everyone claims?
Personally, I'm taking Option #1. And then I'm taking Option #1 again, just for good measure.
Even if you somehow remember seeing this write up by someone on Reddit 3 years ago and think that was something everyone needed to follow, note that even that person thought he was realistically a fringe player. 42 games with the Blues, he was 4-5-9 and he walked as a Group 6 UFA. I don't recall a whole lot of angst from people, zomg we let Joshua walk? Morons, we're going to regret this. Did we underutilize him? Perhaps, but look at the roster in '21, '21-22 and tell me where you were going to play a 24, 25-year old kid just coming out of the AHL. It certainly wasn't going to be on the top-2 lines, would have been a struggle to put him on the 3rd line. He played where we had a spot, we weren't giving anyone a higher roster spot just on virtue of alleged, unproven talent.
I'm happy for the guy, hope he does well in the NHL, all that stuff, but I'm not losing any sleep over him not being here. Let's please not get back to the era where we start lamenting all the guys who were really ordinary here, left for somewhere else, started playing (a lot) better, and we spend years whining about them being gone pretending if we'd have kept them they'd have done the same things here.
I think it’s important to mention that in a few interviews here, he mentioned how he really needed a reality check, he had a wake up moment, which is one of the biggest reasons for his incredible season.Monday's question: are we overrating the actual stat line and then-projected future potential of Dakota Joshua and what he "obviously" would have done here if put on the NHL roster for a full season, or is this a sign that the much-vaunted scouting staff, especially the pro scouting staff, isn't as good as everyone claims?
Personally, I'm taking Option #1. And then I'm taking Option #1 again, just for good measure.
Even if you somehow remember seeing this write up by someone on Reddit 3 years ago and think that was something everyone needed to follow, note that even that person thought he was realistically a fringe player. 42 games with the Blues, he was 4-5-9 and he walked as a Group 6 UFA. I don't recall a whole lot of angst from people, zomg we let Joshua walk? Morons, we're going to regret this. Did we underutilize him? Perhaps, but look at the roster in '21, '21-22 and tell me where you were going to play a 24, 25-year old kid just coming out of the AHL. It certainly wasn't going to be on the top-2 lines, would have been a struggle to put him on the 3rd line. He played where we had a spot, we weren't giving anyone a higher roster spot just on virtue of alleged, unproven talent.
I'm happy for the guy, hope he does well in the NHL, all that stuff, but I'm not losing any sleep over him not being here. Let's please not get back to the era where we start lamenting all the guys who were really ordinary here, left for somewhere else, started playing (a lot) better, and we spend years whining about them being gone pretending if we'd have kept them they'd have done the same things here.
Nope, even as UFA’s, Army is the only one who decides if they leave. Or so I’ve been led to believe.Who says we didn’t want to keep Joshua? He left as a UFA.
I honestly don’t know the answer as to if the Blues weren’t interested in bringing him back or he simply wanted to try his luck in a new org but just pointing out it takes two to tango.
ya im glad charlie is not having to deal with this shitshow here tbh. hes a winner and does not need to put up with nonsense from the kyrous and krugs of the world.Both Joshua and Lindgren were offered contracts, both players declined stating that they wanted to test free agency, both players bet on themselves and won.