Around the NHL – Part XL - Mod post page 249

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I cannot stand that "lost control" horseshit with offside calls. He clearly had full control of the puck the entire time he was skating with it.

Going by the rules that people dug up and posted before, that is beyond a shadow of a doubt, offside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Banger
This goaltending is terrible.

They don't look like Playoff teams tbh.

Colorado is explosive and dynamic... is it good enough to cover up the rest of it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cmox
You don't need to be touching the puck to be in possession of it though. We went through this in the regular season and somone dug up the exact rule that shows this is the case.
So a rolling puck is possession? The puck wasn't flat on the ice, it was spinning on edge. A rolling puck, on edge, not touching his stick. They got the call right.
 
The key is to not allow them to get going in the first place. It’s how Vegas ate them up
Last year

They’ve yet to meet anyone who has chosen to play them like that. Edmonton won’t either.
Rangers and Tampa have no problem slugging it up and playing a grinding game. Which is why I believe who ever wins the east is going to win the cup.
 
Might be misremembering, but didn't we have this exact same situation in a game against Buffalo this season?
Except it was "incorrectly" ruled the opposite way.

Real issue is that what counts as control/possession of the puck feels incredibly inconsistent
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kane One
So a rolling puck is possession? The puck wasn't flat on the ice, it was spinning on edge. A rolling puck, on edge, not touching his stick. They got the call right.

Meh, I really don't want to get into it again. It went for like 20 pages last time until somebody dug into the rulebook and found the definition of possession as being something along the lines of "the defending player does not have the opportunity to make a play at the loose puck". That isn't the exact wording, but it's the gist of what it says.

And the defending player definitely never had a chance there, since the puck was never more than a couple inches from Makar's stick.

So, take that for what you will. There's nothing to be gained from us debating it now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kakko
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad