Around the NHL – Part XL - Mod post page 249

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harbour Dog

Registered User
Jul 16, 2015
10,706
13,843
St. John's
I cannot stand that "lost control" horseshit with offside calls. He clearly had full control of the puck the entire time he was skating with it.

Going by the rules that people dug up and posted before, that is beyond a shadow of a doubt, offside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Banger

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
34,464
52,305
This goaltending is terrible.

They don't look like Playoff teams tbh.

Colorado is explosive and dynamic... is it good enough to cover up the rest of it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cmox

JimmyG89

Registered User
May 1, 2010
9,908
8,551
You don't need to be touching the puck to be in possession of it though. We went through this in the regular season and somone dug up the exact rule that shows this is the case.
So a rolling puck is possession? The puck wasn't flat on the ice, it was spinning on edge. A rolling puck, on edge, not touching his stick. They got the call right.
 

Richard Banger

Mamba Mentality
Sep 29, 2017
5,436
6,439
Was Oklahoma now Texas
The key is to not allow them to get going in the first place. It’s how Vegas ate them up
Last year

They’ve yet to meet anyone who has chosen to play them like that. Edmonton won’t either.
Rangers and Tampa have no problem slugging it up and playing a grinding game. Which is why I believe who ever wins the east is going to win the cup.
 

Kakko

Formerly Chytil
Mar 23, 2011
23,746
3,466
Long Island
Might be misremembering, but didn't we have this exact same situation in a game against Buffalo this season?
Except it was "incorrectly" ruled the opposite way.

Real issue is that what counts as control/possession of the puck feels incredibly inconsistent
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kane One

Harbour Dog

Registered User
Jul 16, 2015
10,706
13,843
St. John's
So a rolling puck is possession? The puck wasn't flat on the ice, it was spinning on edge. A rolling puck, on edge, not touching his stick. They got the call right.

Meh, I really don't want to get into it again. It went for like 20 pages last time until somebody dug into the rulebook and found the definition of possession as being something along the lines of "the defending player does not have the opportunity to make a play at the loose puck". That isn't the exact wording, but it's the gist of what it says.

And the defending player definitely never had a chance there, since the puck was never more than a couple inches from Makar's stick.

So, take that for what you will. There's nothing to be gained from us debating it now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kakko
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad