Toggle sidebar

Around the League Thread Part III: Free Agent Frenzy Hangover

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.


giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingsCourt and Reaper45
We aren't getting a top D with these ridiculous contracts. Hope Clarke pans out and prices come down in 4 years. Sergachev should fire his agent if he doesn't get 9 million in 2 years.
 
King'sPawn said:
Holland was a great pre-cap GM. The salary cap has done a great job separating good GMs from the bad ones.
Click to expand...

Really good point, book full of blank checks makes damn near anyone look good

Full credit for the Euro drafting in that era but sheesh you would think a guy that had Nic Lidstrom would know a thing or two about elite all situations dmen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rumpelstiltskin, cyclones22, kinghock and 1 other person
You know how everyone is always joking that players don't want to go live in Edmonton? Of course it's going to take a terrible contract to keep a soon to be high profile UFA D-man up there. Do we not pay attention to our own jokes? A 29 year old Hyman isn't going there without term and a full NMC either. Danault isn't coming here without the 6 years/NMC.

Not that Holland has been a good GM since Lidstrom and the rest of that late 2000's Wings team finally aged out. However, bad contracts are the price of doing business in the NHL. They're basically impossible to avoid.
 
kingsboy11 said:
Can Nurse's agent work for me? Jesus christ that deal is outstanding for Nurse and horrible for the Oilers
Click to expand...


brutal, Holland got taken to the cleaners. You think he'd learn from that mistake that happened before, Loui Eriksson's contract is also buyout proof.

Holland took a huge risk, that could easily backfire badly. And it wasn't necessary. Nurse doens't have that kind of leverage, I'm not sure what Holland was thinking.

Buyout-Proof: Darnell Nurse's Extra Protection

This isn’t the first time the league has seen contracts structured in a way to prevent buyouts. In the summer of 2016, just a few days after free agency opened, PHR published a piece examining how Loui Eriksson’s deal (and several others signed that day) was essentially buyout-proof. As we enter the final season of that six-year, $36MM deal, Eriksson is still technically active but was scratched for basically the entire 2020-21 campaign. He played just seven games for the Vancouver Canucks this year and has just 14 points over the past two seasons. Despite his obvious struggles, there wasn’t a way to clear his contract off the books–at least not without trading him.
 
The most interesting part of these contracts to me is the back and forth between an individual getting paid and actually having the cap space to ice a contending team. Sure, us and CHI gave huge contracts on the books, but we have those out after we had minimal leverage given that those top tier players had won damn near everything they could for our franchise (and internationally). If they had trouble winning after that due to lack of cap space to add roster depth, it wouldn’t sting as bad to them having already won.

I know their agents coach them otherwise, but I don’t get how more star players who haven’t won’t yet don’t look at Tampa or Boston and realize how important bridge contracts and not gouging their teams’ for every penny is to winning a Cup in the cap era. No one should be surprised 5 years into their 8 year mega-deal when their team isn’t great yet they always act surprised anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SufferingSelfCreated, Kings Rule and Rumpelstiltskin
KingsFan7824 said:
You know how everyone is always joking that players don't want to go live in Edmonton? Of course it's going to take a terrible contract to keep a soon to be high profile UFA D-man up there. Do we not pay attention to our own jokes? A 29 year old Hyman isn't going there without term and a full NMC either. Danault isn't coming here without the 6 years/NMC.

Not that Holland has been a good GM since Lidstrom and the rest of that late 2000's Wings team finally aged out. However, bad contracts are the price of doing business in the NHL. They're basically impossible to avoid.
Click to expand...
That deal is FAR worse than a terrible contract. I understand paying a Edmonton premium, but he got bent the hell over. 8 years, AAV 2-3 million too high, NMC, buyout proof structure, etc. Holland gave up EVERYTHING, handing the GM who takes over after him a boat anchor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raccoon Jesus
ScoreZeGoals said:
That deal is FAR worse than a terrible contract. I understand paying a Edmonton premium, but he got bent the hell over. 8 years, AAV 2-3 million too high, NMC, buyout proof structure, etc. Holland gave up EVERYTHING, handing the GM who takes over after him a boat anchor.
Click to expand...

That's my beef with it. ZERO concessions. What's the benefit to Edmonton? They didn't save money, term, or AAV; there's full no movement protection; the bonus structure ensures a buyout is super punishing. Why? I might even be higher on Nurse than most and sure by the middle years he may not even be raw overpaid at all vs. the market...but what was the urgency here with a year until UFA and coming off his best (unsustainable) season with numbers pumped by McJesus (check his splits, it's uuuugly).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScoreZeGoals, Stimpythecat, Rumpelstiltskin and 2 others
ScoreZeGoals said:
That deal is FAR worse than a terrible contract. I understand paying a Edmonton premium, but he got bent the hell over. 8 years, AAV 2-3 million too high, NMC, buyout proof structure, etc. Holland gave up EVERYTHING, handing the GM who takes over after him a boat anchor.
Click to expand...

That's not the problem of the current GM. The current GM is there for himself. That might be an organizational issue, but then you either get rid of the current GM, or tell the current GM that he can't hand out that contract. Ownership signed off on it. That's not a do whatever sort of contract with some role player for a year or two. That's a significant investment which has to pass through the top.

BringTheReign said:
The most interesting part of these contracts to me is the back and forth between an individual getting paid and actually having the cap space to ice a contending team. Sure, us and CHI gave huge contracts on the books, but we have those out after we had minimal leverage given that those top tier players had won damn near everything they could for our franchise (and internationally). If they had trouble winning after that due to lack of cap space to add roster depth, it wouldn’t sting as bad to them having already won.

I know their agents coach them otherwise, but I don’t get how more star players who haven’t won’t yet don’t look at Tampa or Boston and realize how important bridge contracts and not gouging their teams’ for every penny is to winning a Cup in the cap era. No one should be surprised 5 years into their 8 year mega-deal when their team isn’t great yet they always act surprised anyways.
Click to expand...

TB has the tax thing. It might be overstated, but it also can't be discounted. Boston has lucked out. Who knows what Marchand's contract looks like if he had exploded offensively in his late 20's before signing his current contract. The interesting one is going to be Pastrnak. If they get him at another stupidly good contract, then you know there's some sort of cult going on in Boston.

Raccoon Jesus said:
That's my beef with it. ZERO concessions. What's the benefit to Edmonton? They didn't save money, term, or AAV; there's full no movement protection; the bonus structure ensures a buyout is super punishing. Why? I might even be higher on Nurse than most and sure by the middle years he may not even be raw overpaid at all vs. the market...but what was the urgency here with a year until UFA and coming off his best (unsustainable) season with numbers pumped by McJesus (check his splits, it's uuuugly).
Click to expand...

What's the benefit to Edmonton? What's the alternative for Edmonton? The only reason Keith, at 38, agreed to go there, was to be closer to his son. How many players around the league are in that situation? How do you get players to go to Edmonton? How do you get players to stay in Edmonton? This isn't the NBA, so McDavid alone doesn't make them a contender. The only incentive is money.
 


I'm not sure about this one. 4M is a little high, considering he's been inconsistant. If he returns to form, it's a fair deal. If he doesn't, then it's three long years.

4M left for Sanheim
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom