Feels like "reporters" and "journalists" sometimes read HF for their "thoughts" and "ideas" lol. Bob McKenzie used to post here, I'm sure lots of other lurk around.Really strange timing that I speculated on this late last night and now I'm seeing local media (and Friedman apparently) speculating the same thing.
Obviously it was just me connecting dots and I'm not remotely implying that I'm the reason people are thinking this, but the timing makes me look a hell of a lot more prescient than I could ever claim to be.
lmfao
Pod had less offensive upside than Boldly and Caufield, but was seen as a safer player with higher floor. But at the draft there were still reports that believe he can contribute offensively at the NHL level, but that part of his game never developed further.There was always a question of the offensive upside on Pod.
I’m not sure any part of his game really developed further. He’s about the same player he was when he took his first NHL shift.Pod had less offensive upside than Boldly and Caufield, but was seen as a safer player with higher floor. But at the draft there were still reports that believe he can contribute offensively at the NHL level, but that part of his game never developed further.
If I remember correctly, he wasn't getting much ice time in his D+1 and D+2 seasons in the KHL, 2 crucial development years lost. He probably still won't be a top line scorer in the NHL either way, but maybe he could've been an acceptable middle 6'er.I’m not sure any part of his game really developed further. He’s about the same player he was when he took his first NHL shift.
That’s the nhl development system. Team doesn’t have control over that. Reliant on other organizations to do that, who have no connection with the nhl club until the kid gets to their A club or nhl roster.If I remember correctly, he wasn't getting much ice time in his D+1 and D+2 seasons in the KHL, 2 crucial development years lost. He probably still won't be a top line scorer in the NHL either way, but maybe he could've been an acceptable middle 6'er.
Who was the BPA when we drafted PodzYeah, the two players this board was mostly debating for that pick (Boldy and Caufield) are both on pace for 45+ goals this year.
That pick hurts.
To be fair, the majority of this board wanted Zegras to fall and would have taken him over Boldy or Caulfield. The debate between Boldy ajf Caulfield largely assumed Zegras was gone.Yeah, the two players this board was mostly debating for that pick (Boldy and Caufield) are both on pace for 45+ goals this year.
That pick hurts.
Cosentino on SN really loved Pod. Others, more wary of his offensive upside. He had the widest gap between scouts from what I can recall.To be fair, the majority of this board wanted Zegras to fall and would have taken him over Boldy or Caulfield. The debate between Boldy ajf Caulfield largely assumed Zegras was gone.
something something PDO
something something PDO
Brodin-Faber-Middleton-Spurgeon could be the best top 4 defensive group in the NHL as well. Kind of built like our bluelines of the past. No true superstar but a bunch of fist pairing to #3 types.
He's only 34. Same draft as Myers.i haven’t paid attention to the rest of the league much in the last few years but good god jared spurgeon is still in the nhl?
Wasn't Newhook really popular on here, and I think some were really high on Krebs. I remember Pod was not even really discussed because no one really thought the Canucks would pick him. Just looking at that draft, Harley would fix a lot of our problems.Yeah, the two players this board was mostly debating for that pick (Boldy and Caufield) are both on pace for 45+ goals this year.
That pick hurts.
something something PDO
Yep, a bunch of that draft class from 2008 still around. At varying levels of success.He's only 34. Same draft as Myers.
Paying a guy 8 figures who can't handle his defensive duties is going to be brutal for Edm. Love it.....Looks like Bouchard is benched. At least he was removed from the PP.
Stecher playing with Ekholm at ES now as well.
Yeah, the two players this board was mostly debating for that pick (Boldy and Caufield) are both on pace for 45+ goals this year.
That pick hurts.