Around The League Thread | Let the Games Begin

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,093
2,753
What problems?

Basically all it's doing is wasting a few hours of time for NHL executives/scouts.

Going to a 20 y/o draft with 2 rounds like the NBA or whatever would be more efficient but also totally strip the fun of having large prospect pools and tracking those prospects and following them through the WJCs which is to me one of the most fun 'side quests' of being a hockey fan. And totally kill all fun discussions about scouting and drafting and the like. It would suck.

Well perhaps not problems, but teams invest in drafted players in rounds 3-7 that they really should just move on from and yeah, that's kind of different issue.
 

valkynax

The LEEDAR
Sponsor
May 19, 2011
11,039
12,494
Burnaby

Lol atta boy Poddy

69U9s2.gif


Stamkos 3 pts in 10 games and a -8, that's a yikes.
 

Diamonddog01

Diamond in the rough
Jul 18, 2007
11,214
4,058
Vancouver
Bruins seem to sour in Big Z and Lindstrom already
Zadorov and Lindholm have been part of the problem for Boston.

Yeah. Lindholm's basically been a very good 3rd line C for them like he was for us while Zadorov seems to have lost his physicality and swagger - he's still 3rd in TOI for the Bruins defencemen but Bruins fans don't seem overly pleased.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

Jerry the great

Registered User
Jul 8, 2022
905
917
Yeah. Lindholm's basically been a very good 3rd line C for them like he was for us while Zadorov seems to have lost his physicality and swagger - he's still 3rd in TOI for the Bruins defencemen but Bruins fans don't seem overly pleased.
In what way has he been a very good 3rd line C? he is once again a negative +/- player with a bottom 20 league wide shot diff (centres). half his points this year came in one game vs Montreal. He is a worse player than Teddy Blueger and makes more than 4x for an extra 5 years.
 

SeawaterOnIce

Bald is back in style.
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2011
17,935
22,621
Lindholm isn't a 1C anymore. He was successful in Vancouver because we didn't need him to play in that role. Boston does and his shortcomings are exposed.
He was never a 1st line center. Gaudreau and Tkachuk propped up his ass.
 

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,468
14,657
Missouri
i haven't watch him play at all, but 9 points in 10 games in his second year is awesome stats wise?
Wouldn't say awesome but point wise he's fine. But he doesn't bring much else to the game thus far. +/- is generally a poor stat but when you are sitting at -47 for your 90 game career it goes beyond he plays on a bad team to he's a major reason why they are bad defensively. Obviously he is very young with significant improvement ahead of him. However, people saying he is Patrick Kane but playing center seem pretty accurate at this point. Problem is you don't want Patrick Kane playing center...
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad