Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 24,137
- 29,136
Holl and Kerfoot could have been dumped. In the end, they walked for nothing.
That's what happens... you move on from players, every team does this... and no, Holl and Kerfoot couldn't be dumped...
Our team didn't drop in quality moving on from Hyman, he was adequately replaced in this case, by a replacement level contract. Holl and Kerfoot still would have needed to be replaced, and while Bunting did it a near league minimum contract, the expectation that we can regularly replace mid level players, with league min contracts is unlikely at best. The move you are proposing as as possibility, continues to move us in the direction of a very top heavy team, with even more reliance on league min contracts... it's just the reality.
This was the right move for our team... and congrats to Hyman on his ongoing success. To keep Hyman, would have cost us in other areas...
But our borderline obsession with pining over players that leave the organization and have success is pretty crazy.