I’ve always respected Tampa and would even root for them casually when the Canes were perennially out of the playoffs. My interest in them has waned with them beating us last year and the cap shenanigans but of the teams remaining I like them the most by far. So easy choice to pull for the three peat at this point.Who's everyone rooting for in the conference finals? I'm rooting for Tampa Bay (obviously) and Colorado (can't root for a Canadian team, sorry Canadians).
I don't know where to post this so it goes here. That Seth Jarvis thread in the playoff forum is ridiculous.
I've often noticed when one of our guys gets hit, the main board is all "clean hit, head needs to be up, welcome to real hockey" but when Svech or someone else hits a guy it's "dirty" "suspend him!"
The main boards honestly just aren't that fun anymore. There's way too much "I know better than you" nonsense going on.
I'm glad I haven't looked at that thread in over a week. Don't plan to either.I don't know where to post this so it goes here. That Seth Jarvis thread in the playoff forum is ridiculous.
I've often noticed when one of our guys gets hit, the main board is all "clean hit, head needs to be up, welcome to real hockey" but when Svech or someone else hits a guy it's "dirty" "suspend him!"
The main boards honestly just aren't that fun anymore. There's way too much "I know better than you" nonsense going on.
The NHL is a shitshow with zero consistency, not surpised. This is ultimately why they'll be the 5th or 6th most followed professional league in the USA in a decade or so. So it's no surprise they're trying to turn this into WWE like spectacle.That Makar goal last night is causing quite the debate. Based on the NHL official breakdown of the rules it was the correct call to consider that a goal from what I see. I think the possession part is confusing people. They are either thinking the rule about the attacking player entering the zone before the puck but with possession or the “attempt to gain possession” rule on a delayed offsides where the ref will blow the whistle. Neither applies here.
It's bad enough when we have to analyze millimeters of offside from the puck to blue line and skate blades...now we've gotta determine if the stick was TOUCHING the puck too? He was "in possession" when he brought the puck in before his teammate tagged up, which I thought was offside?That Makar goal last night is causing quite the debate. Based on the NHL official breakdown of the rules it was the correct call to consider that a goal from what I see. I think the possession part is confusing people. They are either thinking the rule about the attacking player entering the zone before the puck but with possession or the “attempt to gain possession” rule on a delayed offsides where the ref will blow the whistle. Neither applies here.
Say what you want about the Jarvis thread, there's one hell of a Habs circle jerk going on over Kotkaniemi on the main forum. They're even going after @bleedgreen for his lack of hockey knowledge, which is just laughable.
I mean its literally 8 pages of them jerking each other off. Bleed was the only Canes poster who commented, before the 8th page, and it was only once.