Around the League - 2024-2025

MCR74

Registered User
Nov 11, 2022
3,909
4,701
There's no way in hell Dubas has even a fraction of Crosby's power level in Pittsburgh.

And he's absolutely earned it, as have Malkin and Letang.

The price paid for Karlsson was too high, a 1st (Konsta Helenius), a 2nd next year and a few journeyman types - but again, you can sort of see how it looked like the right move at the time.

Dubas again shows his inability to take control and his constant deference to others. I don't like nü-speak 'evopsych guys!' lingo, but he's the definition of a beta male.

I unironically think he could be very good as a director of scouting or maybe an AGM, but as the top guy?

View attachment 927839

==

On an unrelated note, what's the deal with this?

View attachment 927840

Maybe I'm misremembering, but I believe Canucks fans assured me that he was better than Matthews.

These guys would fit right in with that team:
1 goal between these 5 players.

View attachment 927822

Give it time. Dubas will go shopping eventually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voodoo Child

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
41,878
12,279
Will be interesting to see if he tries to improve their team with the 26 picks he has over the next 3 years.

Leafs have 16.

Probably depends on what Crosby says.

Its Kyle. There will be a future article... "How 26 became just 6" its not gou g well and he is going to empty the bank
 

stickty111

Registered User
Jan 23, 2017
27,195
34,022
Most ice time for the defenders, on for the empty net goal against.

Celebrini 2nd. goal was pretty good.
Only 3 games but so far pretty positive for Liljegren.
Top 4 ice time. Starting 33% in offensive zone so not exactly sheltering him, and xGF% is pretty much break even at just under 50%. Playing 1st PP too. Hasn't been on the ice for a GA at even strength yet.
 

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
41,878
12,279
There's no way in hell Dubas has even a fraction of Crosby's power level in Pittsburgh.

And he's absolutely earned it, as have Malkin and Letang.

The price paid for Karlsson was too high, a 1st (Konsta Helenius), a 2nd next year and a few journeyman types - but again, you can sort of see how it looked like the right move at the time.

Dubas again shows his inability to take control and his constant deference to others. I don't like nü-speak 'evopsych guys!' lingo, but he's the definition of a beta male.

I unironically think he could be very good as a director of scouting or maybe an AGM, but as the top guy?

View attachment 927839

==

On an unrelated note, what's the deal with this?

View attachment 927840

Elias for a signed Mitch works for me.
 

Voodoo Child

Registered User
Jun 16, 2009
6,485
2,594
Maybe I'm misremembering, but I believe Canucks fans assured me that he was better than Matthews.

This has been an ongoing concern for them and I think part of it is mental.

But I also think he struggles because after however many years in the league he's still 6'2 176.

Next time they play the Leafs look at his neck; his head looks like a grape with a toothpick sticking out of it. If he was a mobile PMD or two way winger he could get away with it, but not as a #1 center.

205-210 isnt necessary but 190-195 would be a great spot for him. He needs to stop Twinkmaxxing and get on the William Nylander workout plan.
 
Last edited:

Peasy

Registered User
May 25, 2012
17,735
16,645
Star Shoppin
That's a little disingenuous. Neither would any draft picks they would have received instead.

Carolina got the best piece no matter which way you cut it, but it was obvious from the jump that Pittsburgh was targeting players that had already been partially developed than raw picks.
Bunting is having a bad season, yes, but the collection of Lucius, Koivunen, and Pono was the haul they wanted and so far they're looking decent
I mean, the whole reason to get prospects instead of more picks was so that they could help them continue to compete. Thats the reasoning that was laid out. Not one of those prospects are contributing for their team that year. So IMO, that is a massive failure and you did not get from the trade what you set out to do.
 

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,849
9,879
Acton, Ontario
I mean, the whole reason to get prospects instead of more picks was so that they could help them continue to compete. Thats the reasoning that was laid out. Not one of those prospects are contributing for their team that year. So IMO, that is a massive failure and you did not get from the trade what you set out to do.
Prospects take years. They were not brought in to help the team this instant.
These kids have been in the organization for, what, two in-season months? Give them some time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dekes For Days

Peasy

Registered User
May 25, 2012
17,735
16,645
Star Shoppin
Prospects take years. They were not brought in to help the team this instant.
These kids have been in the organization for, what, two in-season months? Give them some time.
My point is, I personally do not believe any of those prospects he got will become mainstays in the league.

He took a bunch of quantity over quality. He didnt get a single top 5 prospect from the Canes spec pool and couldn't even get a 1st. The guy paid more to get ROR that was having a down year than he got in return for a much better player.

Like this was his singular best trade asset he is going to get to help to re-build and thats what he ended up with...
 
  • Like
Reactions: BertCorbeau

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,294
15,988
I mean, the whole reason to get prospects instead of more picks was so that they could help them continue to compete.
It's also because they already have a bunch of picks over the next few years, but a pretty barren prospect pool in the present. It helps spread things out. But they're still in development, and I don't think the expectation was for them to be pieces to help them compete this year. Taking back Bunting (50 point pace since being acquired) as the cap balancer was for the present, the prospects were for the near future, and the draft pick was for the far future. You can't just ignore 3 good prospects obtained in the trade because you don't personally believe in them for not instantly making the team. This place has a bad issue ignoring prospect value. Maybe they all bust, but the draft pick is just as likely to anyway. 3 decent shots at a player seems to be more than worth the small difference between a late 1st and a 2nd (that could have been a 1st).
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncleben

weems

Registered User
Jul 3, 2008
18,552
12,649
Only 3 games but so far pretty positive for Liljegren.
Top 4 ice time. Starting 33% in offensive zone so not exactly sheltering him, and xGF% is pretty much break even at just under 50%. Playing 1st PP too. Hasn't been on the ice for a GA at even strength yet.

Liljegren will probably do fairly well in SJ.
He will get icetime and lots of oppurtunity and when he effs up, not nearly as many people are going to care.
Reality is, its pretty tough for Dman to play in Toronto under the bright lights where every mistake gets massively amplified.
Some players are better suited for smaller markets and lesser attention.
 

BertCorbeau

F*ck cancer - RIP Fugu and Buffaloed
Jan 6, 2012
56,381
38,716
Simcoe County
Liljegren will probably do fairly well in SJ.
He will get icetime and lots of oppurtunity and when he effs up, not nearly as many people are going to care.
Reality is, its pretty tough for Dman to play in Toronto under the bright lights where every mistake gets massively amplified.
Some players are better suited for smaller markets and lesser attention.

Smaller market and also a worse team

More freedom to fail can help him improve
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad