It’s a messy situation.
From the article:
‘In response to Ms. Sanders' allegations, the organization immediately conducted a thorough investigation with the assistance of outside counsel, including interviews with internal and external parties, and review of pertinent materials and digital records. Based on the information available to us, we found insufficient evidence to substantiate her claims. Of note, the persons identified by Ms. Sanders in your question are not, and have never been, independent contractors with nor employees of the Chicago Blackhawks.‘
The last part is big if true. It’s within the realm of possibility that her allegations are true but the alleged actions were committed by people who turn out to be from outside the organization.
‘Insufficient evidence to substantiate’ sounds like the NFL ruling on a challenge. That’s not exactly unequivocal, we found no evidence and this is an unsubstantiated allegation. It sounds closer to we feel it’s less than 49% on a balance of probabilities scale but not 0%.
Impossible to tell from what has been released if this woman is just throwing mud and seeing what sticks because her contract wasn’t renewed or didn’t feel comfortable coming forward until she was in a nothing left to lose situation. Of course based on prior history, the Blackhawks could just be lying and trying to muddy the waters.