BigKing
Blake Out of Hell III: Back in to Hell
If we are riding these guys into the ground, I'm all for moving salary and going hard after Tavares.
Which is one of the positives I listed previously in moving Carter. You move salary to make a run for Tavares, and if you sign him it's a coup for your team because you prevent him from signing with a rival like San Jose or Anaheim, you upgrade from Carter to Tavares AND you get assets for Carter.If we are riding these guys into the ground, I'm all for moving salary and going hard after Tavares.
Which is one of the positives I listed previously in moving Carter. You move salary to make a run for Tavares, and if you sign him it's a coup for your team because you prevent him from signing with a rival like San Jose or Anaheim, you upgrade from Carter to Tavares AND you get assets for Carter.
I get it and could get behind that too. I think moving Muzzin and Toffoli clears 8+ million. I dont think you get as high quality of assets for those two as you would for say Carter and Martinez though but I'd be on board with moving either package of players.Completely agree with the concept; however, I don't see Blake moving Carter.
I think you look at moving one of Muzzin/Martinez (probably Muzzin due to more value) for an ELC forward that has shown NHL production +pick/prospect and then also move Toffoli for something similar, although this might be all prospect/pick based.
Can Vilardi play LW or is it RW/C
Vilardi or Muzzin Trade/Kopitar/Brown
Pearson/Tavares/Carter
Iafallo/Kempe/Lewis
Surprise me
Idea here being that Vilardi is good enough to play Top 6 at wing with Carter moving to wing with Tavares. Iafallo can slot back up to LW1 if needed. Maybe the young forward picked up via the Muzzin trade can slot in to Top 6 due to playing with a great C in Kopitar or Tavares.
Tavares makes his linemates better while Toffoli isn't in the same stratosphere as Tavares. I like Muzzin but need to shed cap and I'd like more young, cheap forward help. They could even have one of those popular, all-speed "New NHL" type 3rd lines.
I'm just not sure they have the space available even if they moved Toffoli and Muzzin.
I'll throw out a guess why the Kings will believe that until they're forced not to; the 17-18 Washington Capitals. Whether or not they beat TB at this point, or come close against Winnipeg, isn't the point. They are where they are right now. Go read Tampa fans. They're ready to jump.
The Caps traded Johansson for picks(which haven't helped them yet) because of the cap, not value. They gave 30+ Oshie a bad contract. They have bottom of the barrel free agents like Chiasson and Smith-Pelley actually helping them. They lost Schmidt for nothing, and replaced him with a 7th round pick from 6 years ago, and/or Michal Kempny. Orpik is still in their top 5. They have a 29 year old player that had 1 goal in his previous 25 playoff games with 5 in 14 games this year. This was all after their championship window closed, but they've managed to find themselves in a better physical position to win after that window shut than when it was predicted to be open.
That's what the Kings will sell people on.
San Jose and Vegas can make offers as well. I don't expect the Kings to go after Tavares. Maybe they will give it some lip service. Blake's priority will be Doughty and the Kings will return the status quo roster next season plus Vilardi. We will see relatively the same results and all that will have been done is the odometers on Kopitar, Doughty, Carter and Quick will have increased by a season's worth of games.I don't know if they'll be able to afford Tavares, even if they move Carter. He's likely looking at $9M+ per year, and on top of that, Doughty is a top priority come July 1. I'd love to see Tavares here, but I think that a team in the East will be prepared to make him a very rich player, one the Kings will not be able to afford.
I actually came here to post the same substance but a different viewpoint--all this focus on the construction of Winnipeg (youth, picks), Vegas (impossible to reproduce), and Tampa Bay (success, then tank, now success again), but conveniently no one on this board is looking at the Capitals, who are in a very similar situation as we are. Why aren't they the 'model' for sustained success, but these other franchises are, when they're the closest to advancing to the SCF?
It's almost as if you don't have to do it one way.
San Jose and Vegas can make offers as well. I don't expect the Kings to go after Tavares. Maybe they will give it some lip service. Blake's priority will be Doughty and the Kings will return the status quo roster next season plus Vilardi. We will see relatively the same results and all that will have been done is the odometers on Kopitar, Doughty, Carter and Quick will have increased by a season's worth of games.
Okay, I will play give us the equivalencies between the Kings and Caps rosters, or how the Kings get where the Caps are next season. The Tampa series isn't over yet. I have seen the Caps come from ahead to lose too many times.
As long as it isn't a long term contract, it doesn't matter. If Bozak wants $6M for six years, you pass and move on. There were other examples on the list. You think Letestu is in a position to dictate terms?
Hell, a lot of the big "ifs" actually hit this season and they still wound up getting swept while only scoring three goals. Cause for optimism is not high.
You think Letestu is a #2 center? I'd rather have Trevor Lewis as the #2 center.
Players who you listed (and others would go for) would either cost too much or actually are on the decline and don't have much in the tank and can't hold the fort for several years until prospects are ready.
I promise, I'm not trying to be a pain in the butt here. The ultimate difference is the scale in which you feel more comfortable selling players off than I am. It's why I am okay with trading away Toffoli, Muzzin, etc. They play roles other players can (or currently are) fill in.
You want to trade players before their value drops and the Kings aren't cup favorites. I get that.
I feel the organization has roles and responsibilities that need to be upheld, regardless of their cup contention status. I agree, in a vacuum, the Kings will get way more for Carter now than waiting any longer. But I think the cost to replace him right now will cost a lot more than what the Kings can acquire.
As an aside, I still always wonder why every time there's a rumor about Tavares, he's always linked to the Kings.
He's been rumored to want to play here, for a long time actually.As an aside, I still always wonder why every time there's a rumor about Tavares, he's always linked to the Kings.
I don't recall these rumors. Where have you seen this?He's been rumored to want to play here, for a long time actually.
I don't know if they'll be able to afford Tavares, even if they move Carter. He's likely looking at $9M+ per year, and on top of that, Doughty is a top priority come July 1. I'd love to see Tavares here, but I think that a team in the East will be prepared to make him a very rich player, one the Kings will not be able to afford.
Really? Why? Defense first system. High tax state. Older core. Only thing I can think of is LA but he can just live here in the summer.He's been rumored to want to play here, for a long time actually.
There's been speculation that because of the new contract rules, Tavares could end up being moved in a rare sign-and-trade type deal.
You'd be getting him signed to an 8 year deal. Islanders need goaltending and defense.