Speculation: - Armchair GM - 2026 CBJ Offseason Roster Moves, Rumors, and Discussion | Page 117 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: Armchair GM - 2026 CBJ Offseason Roster Moves, Rumors, and Discussion

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
The biggest problem is that Columbus is likely good enough now to have zero realistic chance at a top 3 pick but bad enough that they are not likely a playoff team. Trading Werenski is a risk, but not sure there is any other obvious way to shift the odds to make them a top 10 team in the league in the next few years with the understanding that they could make a bad trade and go straight to the bottom of the league.

That's why I'm not interested in any package deals for Werenski. We need a premier young asset, perhaps the #2OA pick. Secondary pieces add up to nothing for us.

They have no gamechanger forwards on the prospect list and the goalies always seem to be 4-5 years away. No Gaudreau equivalent is signing in Columbus in free agency.

Well there wasn't a Gaudreau equivalent signing in Columbus in 2022 either. I was the only one here who thought we had a >1% chance of signing him.

As long as you have most of Werenski, Marchenko, Fantilli, and Mateychuk, you're not going to do a full on rebuild.

And yet, that's not really a good enough core to be a contender. With no real means to acquire better high end pieces either

Truly hockey purgatory.

It's not a great situation but Carolina just won without any superstar players, they don't even have a Werenski. You have to take whatever path you can to improve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aaaarrgghh
Would you rather trade 4 1st round picks for Robertson or acquire him by trading some combination of roster players/picks/prospects?

Players, picks and prospects. 4 1st removes your greatest future capital.


I think they would

Player trade means likely Marchenko. So I would rather move 4 1sts for Robertson.
 
That's why I'm not interested in any package deals for Werenski. We need a premier young asset, perhaps the #2OA pick. Secondary pieces add up to nothing for us.



Well there wasn't a Gaudreau equivalent signing in Columbus in 2022 either. I was the only one here who thought we had a >1% chance of signing him.



It's not a great situation but Carolina just won without any superstar players, they don't even have a Werenski. You have to take whatever path you can to improve.
I agree that any trade needs to revolve around very high picks and/or high end prospects ready for a spot but yet to prove themselves. Once a 21 year old proves he is very good, they will be very expensive to get and you won't get enough new assets to change very much.
 
Would Dallas match a $15.5x8 offer or take the picks? I know their cap situation is kinda tight, but I know they've offered him $14m.

I would also rather give 4 1sts than give up Marchenko. A first line of Robertson-Fantilli-Marchenko would be an absolute force.
 
I'd have no issue giving Robertson $14m, so what's one more million?
Columbus may be forced to pay stupid money to lure a star and hope that subsequent success allows more high end players to be interested. It is a little like Deshaun Watson to Cleveland. Cleveland had nothing to sell the player to get him there other than agreeing to pay him a super high guaranteed contract. Now that was a disaster. But the Browns understood what they needed to do to get him.
 
I have no problem giving up Marchenko for Robo. I think Dallas would be looking for mainly now pieces. Not futures.

Dallas likely trades him before it gets to RFA and offer sheets. They don't want futures. But that is what would be best for us, an offer sheet.

Marchenko is too good. I would probably trade him for Robertson but that feels almost lateral. We're giving up a great playdriver who likely increases his scoring.

Would Dallas match a $15.5x8 offer or take the picks? I know their cap situation is kinda tight, but I know they've offered him $14m.

I would also rather give 4 1sts than give up Marchenko. A first line of Robertson-Fantilli-Marchenko would be an absolute force.

Dallas doesn't match that. I don't know if anyone offers it though. I would have done $14m.

There's not much saying that Dallas offered $14m, just a guess by Pagnotta, who is hit or miss (usually miss). Unless there's a report I'm not seeing...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Banana duck

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad