Speculation: Are Rantanen, Kaprisov and Marner establishing themselves as 14M players in the new cap world

Trash Panda

Registered User
May 12, 2021
2,461
4,471
The Avs won the Cup with Rantanen making 11.3% of the cap. Obviously, 14% will make the job that much more difficult, but with the Avs injury history, they should still be able to make the numbers work without too much trouble, especially if Ritchie can contribute while still on his ELC.
The Av’s certainly made Mikko’s salary work, but it had a lot to do with having two of the very best players in the game at under 10 million.

Makar at 9 and MacKinnon at 6.3 the cup year was insane value at the two most important positions in hockey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StumpyTown

IWantSakicAsMyGM

Registered User
Oct 13, 2011
10,064
4,325
Colorado
The Av’s certainly made Mikko’s salary work, but it had a lot to do with having two of the very best players in the game at under 10 million.

Makar at 9 and MacKinnon at 6.3 the cup year was insane value at the two most important positions in hockey.

Yes, that definitely helped. They also had Toews, arguably a top 10D, at $4.1m. And Kadri, a PPG+ 2C that season, at 4.5m. And Nuke at $2.5m. But all that goes to show that you can still build a very good team, despite spending a big chunk of the cap on a winger, assuming you can identify talent well and amass a group of players on contracts they can significantly outplay. Obviously, that's easier said than done, but it's clearly not impossible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seanaconda

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
17,723
25,814
The Av’s certainly made Mikko’s salary work, but it had a lot to do with having two of the very best players in the game at under 10 million.

Makar at 9 and MacKinnon at 6.3 the cup year was insane value at the two most important positions in hockey.
Also Byram on ELC, Nuke, Kadri and Lehkonen playing for dirt cheap, Toews was cheaper than he's now etc... On the other hand, you had Erik Johnson making 6M while being a #6 Dman.

But that Avalanche team was ludicrously stacked, it really shouldn't be held to the standard of a cup winner. That was the most dominant SC winner in the salary cap era, and I don't think it's that close either. And they did it with the worst SC winning goaltending in 30 years.
 

Trash Panda

Registered User
May 12, 2021
2,461
4,471
Yes, that definitely helped. They also had Toews, arguably a top 10D, at $4.1m. And Kadri, a PPG+ 2C that season, at 4.5m. And Nuke at $2.5m. But all that goes to show that you can still build a very good team, despite spending a big chunk of the cap on a winger, assuming you can identify talent well and amass a group of players on contracts they can significantly outplay. Obviously, that's easier said than done, but it's clearly not impossible.
Cost-controlled, homegrown talent is the secret sauce.
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
47,048
21,702
MinneSNOWta
I guess the question is, if my team traded Kaprizov for (let's say) Konecny and Sanheim ($15M cap hit total going forward), instead of signing Kaprizov for 8 x $15M, is Minnesota notably more of Cup contender just based off of that. I don't think it's a slam dunk.

I'm using these two Philly guys as an example because they added to $15M exactly and I really like Konecny's game so he's a guy I'd love to have on the team.

Cost-controlled, homegrown talent is the secret sauce.
Funny, because none of Toews, Kadri or Nichuskin were homegrown. Just some savvy moves that were made.
 

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
33,610
32,566
They aren’t that far off from Draisaitl, 14 million is probably a fair ask for all 3. Marner is the riskiest but that usually doesn’t play much of a factor.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
27,100
33,564
Centers get that. Wingers do not.

I'd rather sign 2 players at $7M than one at $14M

It's about ROI. Their production will likely drop and get worse thag last 3-4 yrs of that contract

I think I'd rather have Rantanen over Troy Terry and Dylan Guenther (the two wingers who are most closely being paid 7M AAV) Both those guys are fantastic. But I'll take the guy that is 2nd in the league in scoring and a proven playoff performer.

Terry and Guenther signed as RFAs before the cap jumped up. If you want two $7m players in UFA next summer, when Rantanen will get his $14m, aim lower. Like league average lower.
 

666

Registered User
Jun 27, 2005
3,217
953
Marner should be less.

None of them are in drai category.
He got 14.

rantanen scored way more goals over his career.

Kaprizov is another year right?

So I would say.

Drai 14
Rant 12.75-13.25
Marner 12.25-12.75
Drai and Rantanen rely on McDavid (32 of 55 points) and Mack (33 of 53 points) too much while
Kaprizov and Marner are the stars (Boldy 15 of 50 points ) and (Nylander 16 of 50 points)
 
Last edited:

StlBigFly

Registered User
Mar 29, 2012
258
111
Drai and Rantanen rely on McDavid (32 of 55 points) and Mack (33 of 53 points) too much while
Kaprizov and Marner are the stars (Boldy 15 of 50 points ) and (Nylander 16 of 50 points)

Interesting that Drai and Rantanen are bigger dudes. Rantanen is a huge dude. I think you’d want a guy like this with your guy who likes space. There is probably a fair bit of extra output due to MacKinnon and he simultaneously being freaks, still, there’s no saying he wouldn’t get some of that same surplus with any other elite player.
 

Ncit3

Registered User
Oct 19, 2011
3,446
3,909
Colorado
Drai and Rantanen rely on McDavid (32 of 55 points) and Mack (33 of 53 points) too much while
Kaprizov and Marner are the stars (Boldy 15 of 50 points ) and (Nylander 16 of 50 points)
Last I checked when MacKinnon was out last year Rantanen lead this team from the front and generated offense for everyone else. He's a play driver. He just doesn't always have to be with Mack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
41,128
19,280
Last I checked when MacKinnon was out last year Rantanen lead this team from the front and generated offense for everyone else. He's a play driver. He just doesn't always have to be with Mack.

Kaprizov does this every single game, every single season, I think is the point. He doesn't ever have a MacKinnon. No one is saying Rantanen is a product of MacKinnon who can't drive play on his own.

But when you look at their production the last 3 seasons and change, and Rantanen is scoring at a 106 point per 82 game pace, and Kaprizov is scoring at a 105 point per 82 game pace, it's worth remembering that Rantanen's most common linemate is a guy who's scored at a 128 point per 82 game pace, and Kaprizov's is a guy who's scored at a 78 point per 82 game pace.
 

93gilmour93

Registered User
Feb 27, 2010
20,126
24,205
All three of these guys will make between 13-14 per year on a 7 or 8 year deal depending on if it's a resign. It's just the way things are moving in the world of NHL stars.
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
41,128
19,280
So MacKinnon signed in 2022-23 for 12.6M AAV, at a time when the cap was 82.5M. That's 15.27% of the cap.

15.27% of the estimate of next year's 92.5M cap is 14.1M.

However, the cap could rise even further than 92.5M, with some estimates between 95 and 97M. So if we call it 96M, 15.27% of that is 14.7M.

But Kaprizov doesn't need a new contract for another year still. If the cap keeps going up, it could reasonably be like 102M for the 2026-27 season when his new contract starts. 15.27% of 102M is almost 15.6M.

Maybe you can take a bit off because Kaprizov isn't MacKinnon and he isn't a center, but he'd also be a UFA, and that would inflate the AAV as well.

Craig Leipold also said no one's going to offer him more money than the Wild.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 666

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad