Confirmed with Link: Arbitration Avoided, Bratt Signs for 1 year, $5.45 million

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,707
30,535
Or maybe Bratt and his 40.3 points per season over 5 seasons………. Since you don’t believe in ppg pace/82. I forgot it’s ok to use ppg pace for everyone except jack and nico
If Jesper only averaged 32 points per season are you willing to say Jack has only averaged 36 and Nico 42?

Either way you want to look at it they all have produced very similarly to date...at roughly around 6-ish ppg...but they aren't all paid similarly and that's the point.
 

Poppy Whoa Sonnet

J'Accuse!
Jan 24, 2007
7,617
8,288
If Bratt puts up a ridiculous year Fitz won't play around, he seems like he recognizes what he has in Bratt just is trying to get a deal on a long term extension while he still has time.

The question I have is what does Bratt want really? How many times does he want to bet on himself? How important is it to have the freedom to choose his team, and what age does he want that? We have no idea but we seem to have no evidence he's unhappy in NJ, or the relationship is poor between parties. Him signing a 3-8 year extension next season just seems the most likely outcome to me, I don't see him getting traded. The number of years is going to be driven by Bratt's desires.
 

Bcap88

Ruff season that’s for sure
Aug 12, 2011
9,731
8,926
Chicago
If Jesper only averaged 32 points per season are you willing to say Jack has only averaged 36 and Nico 42?

Either way you want to look at it they all have produced very similarly to date...at roughly around 6-ish ppg...but they aren't all paid similarly and that's the point.
Once again you are comparing two contracts that were signed under different set of circumstances and aren’t comparable to what Bratt should/would or could make on his long term deal.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,707
30,535
Nico .68 = 7.2 million
Jack .65 = 8 million

Bratt .66 = 5.4????

Huh?
 

hidek91

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
1,823
1,471
Warsaw, PL
If he wanted to walk to free agency, he would've gone through with arbitration, or he could've taken a 4 year deal in 2021. I don't believe he wants to get to free agency ASAP, there's nothing that indicates this.
Was a 4 year deal offered in 2021? Is there any source confirming this? I don't remember anything like this but still, 4 year deal in 2021 would mean that he ends up UFA 1 year later than he's able to. Also, it doesn't matter if he signs QO, goes to arbitration or just forces 1 year deal, the tangible end result is the same.

Again, I could be wrong, we can't know for sure but this is the vibe I get for players who resist signing anything particularly long-term.
 

Poppy Whoa Sonnet

J'Accuse!
Jan 24, 2007
7,617
8,288
If he wanted to walk to free agency, he would've gone through with arbitration, or he could've taken a 4 year deal in 2021. I don't believe he wants to get to free agency ASAP, there's nothing that indicates this.
Is there some CBA benefit to Bratt to take a 1 year deal given through the arbitration process v. agreeing to a 1 year deal before arbitration starts? Does he get some qualifying offer guarantee or something? Or practically speaking are they basically identical outcomes?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Camille the Eel

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,015
14,950
Was a 4 year deal offered in 2021? Is there any source confirming this? I don't remember anything like this but still, 4 year deal in 2021 would mean that he ends up UFA 1 year later than he's able to. Also, it doesn't matter if he signs QO, goes to arbitration or just forces 1 year deal, the tangible end result is the same.

No it doesn't, you have to remember how years worked under COVID. Jesper Bratt signed his most recent contract in January 2021, had he signed for 4 years it would've walked him to UFA (2021, 2022, 2023, 2024).

Again, I could be wrong, we can't know for sure but this is the vibe I get for players who resist signing anything particularly long-term.

The thing is that nobody really does this. I guess Andrew Copp went to arbitration 2 years in a row, settled once and then went the other time, and now he's playing in his hometown. Bratt doesn't have a hometown in the NHL, if he had a trade destination he could've named it and the Devils could've tried to work something out.
 

Devils731

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
12,955
18,437
Also, it doesn't matter if he signs QO, goes to arbitration or just forces 1 year deal, the tangible end result is the same.
I don’t think it totally agree with this.

Going to arbitration means you could find zero common ground with a player/agent.

Even signing a 1 year deal means you found enough common ground somewhere to skip arbitration.

Both results are a 1 year deal but it’s better to avoid arbitration than go to it; even if ultimately doesn’t matter.
 

Devil X

Call me Nostradamus
Jul 9, 2007
6,074
1,850
Bergen County
Nico .68 = 7.2 million
Jack .65 = 8 million

Bratt .66 = 5.4????

Huh?

This is different as 2 are long term and 1 is a 1 year deal. Bratt and his rep are banking on Bratt having another big season and getting that money higher. Im sure it will make Fitz more comfortable with committing that money long term.

My guess is they were trying to get Bratt to sign long term for a sub 7 million contract. I think when its all said and done Bratt will land between Nico and Jack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glenwo2

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,707
30,535
Centers... blah blah blah...

Most important blah blah blah...

Free agency rolls around everyone's willing to pony up 9 million for a 1st line winger. So ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glenwo2

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
68,521
34,041
AGAIN…knock off this ‘attack the poster’ crap, either argue the opinions, keep your personal jabs off the board or report the posts if you believe someone is trolling
 

ChicksDigTheTrap

No quick fixes, no cutting corners and no cheating
Sep 16, 2018
4,945
5,240
Springsteen Country
This is different as 2 are long term and 1 is a 1 year deal. Bratt and his rep are banking on Bratt having another big season and getting that money higher. Im sure it will make Fitz more comfortable with committing that money long term.

My guess is they were trying to get Bratt to sign long term for a sub 7 million contract. I think when its all said and done Bratt will land between Nico and Jack.
Agree. It is amazing how little posters understand about the NHL salary system.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,707
30,535
Do you not understand the difference between one RFA year, and 8 year contracts eating up 4 RFA years and 4 UFA years...?
Do you not understand that there aren't 4 RFA years because they low balled him on the last go around and Bratt probably lost about 8/9 million maybe more in career earnings?
 
Last edited:

Camille the Eel

Registered User
This is different as 2 are long term and 1 is a 1 year deal. Bratt and his rep are banking on Bratt having another big season and getting that money higher. Im sure it will make Fitz more comfortable with committing that money long term.

My guess is they were trying to get Bratt to sign long term for a sub 7 million contract. I think when its all said and done Bratt will land between Nico and Jack.
If he keeps trending up he will end up as a free agent someplace with significantly more money than Nico or Jack. That is probably what’s driving this. We just reportedly offered Gaudreau north of 11 million a year.

That’s the upside here for Bratt to become a UFA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicksDigTheTrap

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
68,521
34,041
If he keeps trending up he will end up as a free agent someplace with significantly more money than Nico or Jack. That is probably what’s driving this. We just reportedly offered Gaudreau north of 11 million a year.

That’s the upside here for Bratt to become a UFA.
LOL I’d bet serious money we didn’t even offer Gaudreau $10 million per let alone $11. If we had he wouldn’t have been begging Columbus to jump in. And Bratt doesn’t have JG numbers so his upside is a bit below what Gaudreau got.
 

ChicksDigTheTrap

No quick fixes, no cutting corners and no cheating
Sep 16, 2018
4,945
5,240
Springsteen Country
If he keeps trending up he will end up as a free agent someplace with significantly more money than Nico or Jack. That is probably what’s driving this. We just reportedly offered Gaudreau north of 11 million a year.

That’s the upside here for Bratt to become a UFA.
Correct, This is why posters like me are constantly against trading pick #2 and prospects like Holtz. Team control is important. The Devils cannot control what Bratt does after next season,.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hidek91

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,015
14,950
Do you understand that there aren't 4 RFA years because they low balled him on the last go around and Bratt probably lost about 8/9 million maybe more in career earnings?

He didn't lose anything, which is the point. He's betting on himself and so far he's winning.
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
72,999
47,185
PA
Do you not understand that there aren't 4 RFA years because they low balled him on the last go around and Bratt probably lost about 8/9 million maybe more in career earnings?

so just to be clear, they've lowballed Bratt twice now?

Yet have given fair contracts (in the past 2-3 years) to Nico, Hughes, Hamilton, Palat, and Siegenthaler without seemingly any intense negotiations? What does that tell you?

If he keeps trending up he will end up as a free agent someplace with significantly more money than Nico or Jack. That is probably what’s driving this. We just reportedly offered Gaudreau north of 11 million a year.

That’s the upside here for Bratt to become a UFA.

if the Devils offered Gaudreau $11 million/year, Gaudreau would be a Devil right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad