For those who are claiming this is a way to get Bratt more money with us but still stay long-term, I implore you to answer this simple question if you can:
Premise: Jesper Bratt and his agent this offseason wanted 'X million over Y years'. The Devils offered something below it. They essentially settled on the arbitration deal.
Question: why wouldnt Jesper Bratt just raise the price of his 'X million' to 'Z million' over the same 'Y years'?? If the Devils are allowing him to prove himself further, why would the asking price of Bratt's agent not also rise? So now in 2023 the Devils will offer the 'X million over Y years' that Jesper wanted, but now he wants 'Z million over Y years'!
I ask that question because.. in this silly hypothetical world where the Devils let Jesper drag them to arbitration just so he could prove himself further for a bigger deal, why wouldnt Jesper and his agent just increase the price yet again to something the Devils wont pay? Why would Jesper Bratt risk injury just to get the same contract he wanted a year prior? He wont want more for proving more/playing better?
Its illogical and is just copium. Im sorry Devils fans who believe this to be true. But youre in for a rude awakening, unfortunately. Player-selected arbitration is universally bad for the team-player repore, no matter the sport. This is not a Devils issue its a Bratt issue. The sooner some figure this out the quicker theyll go back to being Devils fans not just Bratt fans.
This whole entire premise is based on the Devils actually offering Bratt what he was worth. What he was worth was around 8. I highly highly doubt they did that. It is a Devils issue for not shelling out the money needed for their 2nd best player