He’s been good for the Canucks so far. Leave him be. He’s a solid player and he’s found a good role under Tocchet.
They’d be lucky to get a 2nd for him though. More likely a 3rd would be his value. He’s worth every bit of that value to the Canucks.
It’s just where the game is at with the cap. Secondary and role playing wingers are who’s taking the biggest hit during this cap crunch. No matter what you think of him, he’s in one of those two categories.
Reasonable take.
Beauvillier had shit for brains and bricks for hands even when he had opportunities. The system might've lowered his opportunities, but he did nothing with the ones he got.
I'm not sure what kind of discourse your looking for with comments like this? Obviously he's a good NHLer
Beauvillier i agree is not a high iQ player but he's quick and has a decent skill level. He's thrived as a disruptor and can get in on the forecheck and create turnovers and is a nice addition to a team that has a bunch of higher IQ high skill players that need what AB brings to complement their games.
As far as hockey IQ it's pretty commonplace that as players mature they learn how to play smarter and a new team and environment cant do wonders to foster that. So far so good in Van
He's nothing special though in the grand scheme .5 ppg players don't hold a ton of external value outside of the deadlines. His value is that he adds speed and depth to the forward corps and can do some heavy lifting. Canucks need a couple more guys actually playing at his level or being healthy to have good depth so he's valuable to us just not more than a good 3C or top4 D and we can use the cap space for that.
As far as Beuvillier for Dvorak i would do that. Him and Garland had some chemistry formerly and could be 2/3rds of a good 3rd line. Beauvillier would probably thrive close to home or could be flipped for a better return than Dvorak by next off season though so i could see some rationale on both sides