SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
Both are built for the playoffs. Tough call who people would take. 
-
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Proposal: Anson Carter: Marner for Rantanen
- Thread starter S E P H
- Start date
Bone Density
Registered User
"Fellas, could you call me Ace?"
Bruce Granville
Registered User
If Toronto wants Rantanen, they need to offer Matthews.
They are already a better TEAM without him and adding Rantanen to that? Big W.
You can‘t spell team without AM but in Toronto‘s case you maybe should at least think about it.
Avs get term and essentially a replacement for MacKinnon‘s wing who also can win faceoffs. Small W.
They are already a better TEAM without him and adding Rantanen to that? Big W.
You can‘t spell team without AM but in Toronto‘s case you maybe should at least think about it.
Avs get term and essentially a replacement for MacKinnon‘s wing who also can win faceoffs. Small W.
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
What's the point of this? Each team knows their talent the the player knows the team. What would be the purpose of each team making the pending UFA flip?
Marner is great for Matthews and Rantanen is great for MacKinnon. I don't see the point of doing that trade one bit.
Marner is great for Matthews and Rantanen is great for MacKinnon. I don't see the point of doing that trade one bit.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Minor hockey tryouts (was: How to motivate a novice (or any) player for tryouts?)
- Latest: Minnesota Knudsens
