Proposal: Anson Carter: Marner for Rantanen

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,668
15,281
Pickering, Ontario
Marner is the more complete player. One of the best Pkers in the league, Selke finalist as a winger, plays all situations and key moments often being the best player on his line.

Keep in mind, we are talking about two of the leagues best superstars here. Neither is bad. We're debating the margins here. I feel Marner impacts other areas of the game more, like a Stone type winger who also is able to put up superstar offensive stats despite playing in defense first systems.
I see no reason to take Marner over rantanen. Rantanen is much better in playoffs, has been higher production player in 22/23 and 23/24 and still is at the moment now. Has played Center for stints and been productive.

You take the big bodied winger who gives ~45G and 60A over the smaller winger who gives ~30G and 70A with the playoffs being in the Rantanens favour

league wide wingers

Tier 1:

Kucherov
Kaprizov
Pastranak
Rantanen

Tier 2:

Tkachuck
Marner
Nylander
Panarin
Reinhart
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,628
30,069
I see no reason to take Marner over rantanen. Rantanen is much better in playoffs, has been higher production player in 22/23 and 23/24 and still is at the moment now. Has played Center for stints and been productive.

You take the big bodied winger who gives ~45G and 60A over the smaller winger who gives ~30G and 70A with the playoffs being in the Rantanens favour

league wide wingers

Tier 1:

Kucherov
Kaprizov
Pastranak
Rantanen

Tier 2:

Tkachuck
Marner
Nylander
Panarin
Reinhart

I mean, look at the difference in systems. Avs are terrible defensively and play a rush game you would expect scoring to be higher.
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,960
24,067
I mean, look at the difference in systems. Avs are terrible defensively and play a rush game you would expect scoring to be higher.
Based on what metric? The Avs have been one of the better teams defensively for many years now.

Avs also don't play rush game. They can certainly play from the rush, but their offensive zone time is among the highest in the league. Only Carolina has a higher O-zone percentage in fact.
 
Last edited:

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,668
15,281
Pickering, Ontario
I mean, look at the difference in systems. Avs are terrible defensively and play a rush game you would expect scoring to be higher.
Leafs havent been a good defensive system for more than 20 games this year.

We played the same rush/offense heavy system with Keefe for 5 years and marner wasnt outproducing Rantanen then either.

Marner needs to outproduce Rantanen sizably/significant amount to make up for the playoff production gap and he isnt capabpe of doing that.
 

Unbiased Fan

Registered User
May 24, 2019
3,815
1,809
I’ll take the cup winner over someone who hasn’t seen game 6 of Round 2
Honestly if the Blackhawks offered Bedard for Landeskog if he comes back I’d take that if I’m Colorado I know guys like Landy, Nuke, Towes, etc won the cup but Bedard is a generational talent. People on the site are ridiculous saying ANY player who has won a cup has more value than Bedard or even a guy like Dahlin
 

benfranklin

Registered User
Jun 29, 2024
578
471
Marner is the more complete player. One of the best Pkers in the league, Selke finalist as a winger, plays all situations and key moments often being the best player on his line.

Keep in mind, we are talking about two of the leagues best superstars here. Neither is bad. We're debating the margins here. I feel Marner impacts other areas of the game more, like a Stone type winger who also is able to put up superstar offensive stats despite playing in defense first systems.
Apples to oranges I suppose. I'll give you the 22-23 Selke votes because those are a big deal and tough to quantify in value. Same with playing the PK. That obviously brings value assuming the PK is solid.

Were comparing a 30-60-90 player to a 40-60-100/50-50-100 player. Does the defensive game make up the difference in the offensive game? Maybe, but at best IMO you can argue they're even overall and more often than not, the tie breaker will go to offensive production.

And sadly not to beat a dead horse, but playoff production is there. Career .87 and losing vs 1.24 and won.

Honestly if the Blackhawks offered Bedard for Landeskog if he comes back I’d take that if I’m Colorado I know guys like Landy, Nuke, Towes, etc won the cup but Bedard is a generational talent. People on the site are ridiculous saying ANY player who has won a cup has more value than Bedard or even a guy like Dahlin
Obviously context matters, but if two players are very similar, the edge goes to playoff production. Bedard and Dahlin also arent fair examples since they havent made the playoffs. Marner has been there 8 years in a row now.
 

Unbiased Fan

Registered User
May 24, 2019
3,815
1,809
Apples to oranges I suppose. I'll give you the 22-23 Selke votes because those are a big deal and tough to quantify in value. Same with playing the PK. That obviously brings value assuming the PK is solid.

Were comparing a 30-60-90 player to a 40-60-100/50-50-100 player. Does the defensive game make up the difference in the offensive game? Maybe, but at best IMO you can argue they're even overall and more often than not, the tie breaker will go to offensive production.

And sadly not to beat a dead horse, but playoff production is there. Career .87 and losing vs 1.24 and won.


Obviously context matters, but if two players are very similar, the edge goes to playoff production. Bedard and Dahlin also arent fair examples since they havent made the playoffs. Marner has been there 8 years in a row now.
Well that doesn’t make sense? Dahlin has been in the league 3 years less and hasn’t even played 1 game. How is that resume better than Marners? Maybe Brady Tkachuk vs Nichuskinin? Tage Thompson vs Devon Towes, Dylan Larkin vs Landeskog. Great players are great players and team success should play no part in a discussion imo. Put Nathan MacKinnon right now on the worst team in the OHL. Even with him scoring 5 points a night that team is so bad they aren’t going anywhere in playoffs.
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,960
24,067
Well that doesn’t make sense? Dahlin has been in the league 3 years less and hasn’t even played 1 game. How is that resume better than Marners? Maybe Brady Tkachuk vs Nichuskinin? Tage Thompson vs Devon Towes, Dylan Larkin vs Landeskog. Great players are great players and team success should play no part in a discussion imo. Put Nathan MacKinnon right now on the worst team in the OHL. Even with him scoring 5 points a night that team is so bad they aren’t going anywhere in playoffs.
When talking about Marner and Rantanen, it's not the fact that the Avs have won and the Leafs have failed. It's about the fact that Marner drops his point production by 0.24 PPG when the playoffs start, while Rantanen elevates his by 0.16 PGG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Washed Up 29YearOld

Unbiased Fan

Registered User
May 24, 2019
3,815
1,809
When talking about Marner and Rantanen, it's not the fact that the Avs have won and the Leafs have failed. It's about the fact that Marner drops his point production by 0.24 PPG when the playoffs start, while Rantanen elevates his by 0.16 PGG.
See that’s a fair point but the original post I replied to was dumb that’s all I’m saying. Lots of great players on brutal teams in any league.
 

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,676
23,386
Canada
I don't think I'd do it from the Leafs' perspective.

Marner is a bit of a love-hate player due to the underperforming in the postseason, but that's historically been a team issue. Rantanen doesn't solve the top heavy roster issue and he's not really adding anything that's missing on the Leafs' roster.

Leafs just need to bite the bullet and find a reasonable long term cap number for Marner.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad