Proposal: Anson Carter: Marner for Rantanen

[S E P H]

During the 1st intermission of VGK/COL, Carter proposed Rantanen for Marner. Thoughts? Good value? Who says no?

Contracts:

Mikko Rantanen: 1 year - 9.25 million (UFA)
Mitch Marner: 1 year - 10.9 million (UFA)

Click to read more...

 

[OilersFanatics505]

I’ll take the cup winner over someone who hasn’t seen game 6 of Round 2

 

[Sens With Benefits]

Nah. Mitch falls apart in the playoffs.

 

[TheNumber4]

Avs could win this trade, when Marner realizes how much easier it is to perform outside Toronto.

 

[Tralfamadore]

Leafs need Marner more. He's a facilitator. Mikko doesn't create a ton on his own.

 

[TheBeard]

Miko should cost Marner and a Knies.

 

[archangel2]

During the 1st intermission of VGK/COL, Carter proposed Rantanen for Marner. Thoughts? Good value? Who says no?

Contracts:

Mikko Rantanen: 1 year - 9.25 million (UFA)
Mitch Marner: 1 year - 10.9 million (UFA)

No from AVs

 

[frightenedinmatenum2]

It only makes sense if:
Rantanen insists on testing the market and wants 13+.
Marner is willing to sign for a reasonable cap hit like 10M-11M, but Toronto doesn't want him.
Colorado would pay Marner 10M-11M.
Marner would waive to sign in Colorado.

In that scenario, Colorado downgrades by they get term. Toronto upgrades, and the cost to upgrade is a sunk cost since they don't want to keep Marner anyways.

 

[Pierce Hawthorne]

In a vacuum the value is probably reasonably close. Maybe Rantanen carries a bit more value given playoff pedigree and the whole Goals>Assists... But its also a deal that simply isn't gonna happen either. Both guys are going to either re-sign or end up as UFAs. Neither team will trade their guy.

 

[Dennis Reynolds]

What are the significant pieces that Toronto is adding?

 

[Shark Finn]

The last thread on this went so well so why not again