Speculation: Another year of this Bluc **** (The 2024-25 season thread)

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,958
17,837
Kuemper Buyout:

SeasonSavingsCap Hit
2025-26$1,791,667$3,458,333
2026-27$1,041,667$4,208,333
2027-28($708,333)$708,333
2028-29($708,333)$708,333

Makes sense to do it this offseason.
 

Omni Owl

Mar 9, 2008
6,574
1,115
Totally forgot we still had Moverare. We sure have a plethora of #6-7 D-men. Interesting they chose Portillo over Copley, guess they want to see what he can do...
 

KopitarGOAT420

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
583
874
USA
OK just when i think they got it right w QB on PP1, I see they moved Clarke to PP2? File this under Make it make sense

I like that Hiller has proven he's not afraid to get creative with his lineup decisions...... But I reallllllly think he overdoes/overthinks it sometimes.

Clarke is very good at manning the point on a powerplay- He knows how to get pucks through defenses and either on net or to the front of the net for rebound opportunities. It's honestly one of the biggest strengths to his game IMO. He's also just an exceptional playmaker in general who sees the ice really well. He's not the issue with your struggling powerplay.

TBH, it's probably not a personnel issue to begin with... I definitely understand trying to change things up a bit but you have a powerplay with Clarke, Kempe, Kopitar, Fiala, and Laferriere.... As an NHL coach, you should be able to get at least decent production out of that group. There's plenty of offensive ability among those 5 players.

Maybe instead of jumping to "lets try 5 forwards on the PP" they should take a look at "lets try to get these guys cycling around the ice so we can generate some different looks for different players instead of constantly setting up the same 2-3 shot attempts"??

We don't need 5 forwards on the PP - we need a PP that isn't completely and totally predictable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AbsentMojo

shuchukfan

Registered User
Mar 11, 2015
776
1,214
OC
That got me thinking.. but its not legal to have more than one.. Can u imagine, they could lay sideways one on top of the other and block all 4x6
kinky-hedley-lamarr.gif
 

lumbergh

It was an idea. I didn't say it was a good idea.
Jan 8, 2007
6,545
5,978
Richmond, VA
OK just when i think they got it right w QB on PP1, I see they moved Clarke to PP2? File this under Make it make sense

Glad to see Turcotte back on the ice and evidently ready for game action and on the power play. Stay safe, buddy.

My guess with this power play alignment is that Hiller thinks Spence isn't doing a good job of generating offense on PP2.
 

Johnny Utah

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
11,171
3,375
Santa Monica, CA
A few good things from this year...

The Kings are the 8th youngest team and finally giving the kids a shot - Turcotte, Thomas, Lee, Clarke, and now Helenius and Portillo.

The Kings are tied with NJ for the league in fights - so they are finally not getting bullied.

The bad...

Danault, Byfield, and Spence look terrible.

Also, the Kings need a scorer to play with Kopitar/Kempe. I was going thru the league leaders in goals and a few guys intrigued me - McCann and Palmeri. Also, bummer the Kings didn't make a run at Jack Roslovic - he's having a great center and can play C/RW.

The D without Doughty has been a mess. Gavrikov and Anderson have been awesome, Clarke is having a solid year, Spence has been terrible and the rotation of Englund/Burroughs/Jones hasn't done much. Englund looks worse than last year, Jones is hurt and barely plays, even though he has the best Corsi of the three. I thought Burroughs was playing the best of the three, but he's out of the line up again.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad