Joeyjoejoe
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2015
- 6,496
- 9,444
NHL got no one to blame but themselves, they are the ones that approve trades and they initially approved this one without due diligence.
I'm not sure why you are assuming such a system couldn't be designed to protect this information from other GMs. The point is that if the league wants (or in this case, needs) to rule on a situation in a timely manner they will have the complete and up-to-date information on file at Central Registry to be able to deal with this effectively in a matter of minutes instead of days. The GM that holds the contract will be the only one to know the details, and there should be consequences for teams whose GMs send deals to Central Registry with violations of the players' contractual rights known to them at the time.No they shouldn’t be anywhere where a team cannot control access. I wouldn’t want to be a GM trying to negotiate a trade for a player when the list of locations is known. Why would I want to give teams leverage because they know you can’t send the player to other specific teams. The contract is a private legal document between a team and the player. They should be the only ones that are able to disclose any information.
I'm a Flames fan...I am all for Vegas having issues and having to keep Martinez and Stone "injured" until the post season..
why is verbeek supposed to know about anaheim being on dadonov's NTC when his own team apparently didn't know about it? that's on vegas and the league, not verbeek1. Assuming they paid fair value, they do get the assets they traded back and would not be entitled to any other compensation as trades do get voided from time to time.
2. The next time someone calls, Verbeek could do his due diligence before completing the trade. If the player's health is in issue, then he could insist on seeing the medical reports. In any case, he should read the player's contract and if there are any special clauses he should satisfy himself as to compliance. If it involves third-party rights, such as an obligation to a player or to another team, then insist on confirmation from the third party.
Maybe Vegas knew too and was trying to strong arm Dadanov into accpting a trade to a club he had on his NTC?I knew Dadonov had a NTC, how did the Knights not know?
I'm not sure why you are assuming such a system couldn't be designed to protect this information from other GMs. The point is that if the league wants (or in this case, needs) to rule on a situation in a timely manner they will have the complete and up-to-date information on file at Central Registry to be able to deal with this effectively in a matter of minutes instead of days. The GM that holds the contract will be the only one to know the details, and there should be consequences for teams whose GMs send deals to Central Registry with violations of the players' contractual rights known to them at the time.
Eh, we'll see how much leeway they get on LTIR.At the very least, we can finally put to bed the silly conspiracy theories that the league was giving Vegas preferential treatment after they voided this trade. It is fun to watch them try to perform cap gymnastics now.
Wouldn't be the first time they've mistreated one of their players.Maybe Vegas knew too and was trying to strong arm Dadanov into accpting a trade to a club he had on his NTC?
Verbeek should read the player's contract before he completes the trade.why is verbeek supposed to know about anaheim being on dadonov's NTC when his own team apparently didn't know about it? that's on vegas and the league, not verbeek
In before Dadonov plus 2 first rounders for Shea Weber
If it falls through, Vancouver will take a second to eat Dadanovs contract. Not using him in the playoffs doesn't really faze us. You can have Ferland if an LTIR contract is needed to legitimize the trade.
If Anaheim is on the NTC, I’ll bet Vancouver is on it as well. It seems like a tax thing with Dadonov.
At the very least, we can finally put to bed the silly conspiracy theories that the league was giving Vegas preferential treatment after they voided this trade. It is fun to watch them try to perform cap gymnastics now.
If Anaheim is on the NTC, I’ll bet Vancouver is on it as well. It seems like a tax thing with Dadonov.
That's a stretch.Maybe Vegas knew too and was trying to strong arm Dadanov into accpting a trade to a club he had on his NTC?
Yeah I really don't think it will be that hard to offload him to a different team for a second and a few million dollars.If it falls through, Vancouver will take a second to eat Dadanovs contract. Not using him in the playoffs doesn't really faze us. You can have Ferland if an LTIR contract is needed to legitimize the trade.
NHL got no one to blame but themselves, they are the ones that approve trades and they initially approved this one without due diligence.
i don't see why verbeek would feel the need to ask for confirmation from a player's agent because i don't think any GM would believe that a player's own team would be unaware of which teams are on his NTC. needing to confirm something so simple probably never crosses any GMs mindVerbeek should read the player's contract before he completes the trade.
If there is a special clause in the contract, such as a modified no-trade clause, Verbeek should ask for a copy of the no-trade list.
If Vegas says there is no no-trade list, then Verbeek should say then please give me written confirmation of that from the player's agent. I know what you're telling me, but it doesn't sound right and there might be some mistake. I can't count on what you're saying, and I need to be sure.
I'm a lawyer, and I've been having conversations like that on behalf of my clients almost every day for the past 36 years. You just don't take someone's word for it when it comes to third-party rights.
Vegas should have done the same as well.