Confirmed Trade: [ANA/VGK] Evgenii Dadonov, cond. 2023/24 2nd round pick for John Moore, Ryan Kesler [OFFICIALLY VOIDED]

MissouriMook

Still just a Mook among men
Sponsor
Jul 4, 2014
8,056
8,656
No they shouldn’t be anywhere where a team cannot control access. I wouldn’t want to be a GM trying to negotiate a trade for a player when the list of locations is known. Why would I want to give teams leverage because they know you can’t send the player to other specific teams. The contract is a private legal document between a team and the player. They should be the only ones that are able to disclose any information.
I'm not sure why you are assuming such a system couldn't be designed to protect this information from other GMs. The point is that if the league wants (or in this case, needs) to rule on a situation in a timely manner they will have the complete and up-to-date information on file at Central Registry to be able to deal with this effectively in a matter of minutes instead of days. The GM that holds the contract will be the only one to know the details, and there should be consequences for teams whose GMs send deals to Central Registry with violations of the players' contractual rights known to them at the time.
 

lwvs84

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
4,361
3,046
Los Angeles, CA
I'm a Flames fan...I am all for Vegas having issues and having to keep Martinez and Stone "injured" until the post season..

Oh, I hope those two come back and Vegas has to forfeit games and don't make playoffs. I can't remember a team ever having to forfeit a game, I think it would be funny for Vegas to be the... first? At least the first in a long time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DomBarr

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,167
16,801
1. Assuming they paid fair value, they do get the assets they traded back and would not be entitled to any other compensation as trades do get voided from time to time.

2. The next time someone calls, Verbeek could do his due diligence before completing the trade. If the player's health is in issue, then he could insist on seeing the medical reports. In any case, he should read the player's contract and if there are any special clauses he should satisfy himself as to compliance. If it involves third-party rights, such as an obligation to a player or to another team, then insist on confirmation from the third party.
why is verbeek supposed to know about anaheim being on dadonov's NTC when his own team apparently didn't know about it? that's on vegas and the league, not verbeek
 

Cogburn

Pretend they're yachts.
May 28, 2010
15,132
4,507
Vancouver
If it falls through, Vancouver will take a second to eat Dadanovs contract. Not using him in the playoffs doesn't really faze us. You can have Ferland if an LTIR contract is needed to legitimize the trade.
 

lwvs84

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
4,361
3,046
Los Angeles, CA
I'm not sure why you are assuming such a system couldn't be designed to protect this information from other GMs. The point is that if the league wants (or in this case, needs) to rule on a situation in a timely manner they will have the complete and up-to-date information on file at Central Registry to be able to deal with this effectively in a matter of minutes instead of days. The GM that holds the contract will be the only one to know the details, and there should be consequences for teams whose GMs send deals to Central Registry with violations of the players' contractual rights known to them at the time.

It would be pretty easy to have a system like that. Our school uses a system where only certain people have access to files on a student's record. Same thing could be used on an NHL system. Make certain things that are public knowledge visible to everyone (contract length, cap hit, NTC/NMC, etc.) and hide things you may want to send to other teams just prior to or after trades. Can't imagine a system like that costs much relative to the income of the NHL.
 

Static

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2006
49,267
37,343
SoCal
At the very least, we can finally put to bed the silly conspiracy theories that the league was giving Vegas preferential treatment after they voided this trade. It is fun to watch them try to perform cap gymnastics now.
Eh, we'll see how much leeway they get on LTIR.
 

Ciao

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2010
10,220
6,072
Toronto
why is verbeek supposed to know about anaheim being on dadonov's NTC when his own team apparently didn't know about it? that's on vegas and the league, not verbeek
Verbeek should read the player's contract before he completes the trade.

If there is a special clause in the contract, such as a modified no-trade clause, Verbeek should ask for a copy of the no-trade list.

If Vegas says there is no no-trade list, then Verbeek should say then please give me written confirmation of that from the player's agent. I know what you're telling me, but it doesn't sound right and there might be some mistake. I can't count on what you're saying, and I need to be sure.

I'm a lawyer, and I've been having conversations like that on behalf of my clients almost every day for the past 36 years. You just don't take someone's word for it when it comes to third-party rights.

Vegas should have done the same as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DueDiligence

Brazen331

Registered User
Jul 18, 2018
700
295
If it falls through, Vancouver will take a second to eat Dadanovs contract. Not using him in the playoffs doesn't really faze us. You can have Ferland if an LTIR contract is needed to legitimize the trade.

If Anaheim is on the NTC, I’ll bet Vancouver is on it as well. It seems like a tax thing with Dadonov.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cogburn

DarkandStormy

Registered User
Apr 29, 2014
7,236
3,432
614
At the very least, we can finally put to bed the silly conspiracy theories that the league was giving Vegas preferential treatment after they voided this trade. It is fun to watch them try to perform cap gymnastics now.

Their only option(s) left are to trade a guy or two, with picks, to a non-playoff team, right? Given all the implications that come from a post-deadline deal.

Unless they think they can make the playoffs with Stone and Martinez on LTIR lol
 

Ciao

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2010
10,220
6,072
Toronto
Maybe Vegas knew too and was trying to strong arm Dadanov into accpting a trade to a club he had on his NTC?
That's a stretch.

I think they were just careless and lazy.

They didn't do due diligence on the NTC before acquiring the player, and they didn't follow-up on it in the many months that followed while he was under contract to them.
 

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
51,200
43,213
Orange County, CA
After the Pederson-Stripling trade to the Angels falling apart and now this BS I'll never believe a trade involving one of my teams again until that player hits the ice/field/court lmfao
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SoCal Dreaming

Steerpike

We are never give up
Feb 15, 2014
1,795
1,750
Colorado
If it falls through, Vancouver will take a second to eat Dadanovs contract. Not using him in the playoffs doesn't really faze us. You can have Ferland if an LTIR contract is needed to legitimize the trade.
Yeah I really don't think it will be that hard to offload him to a different team for a second and a few million dollars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cogburn

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,167
16,801
Verbeek should read the player's contract before he completes the trade.

If there is a special clause in the contract, such as a modified no-trade clause, Verbeek should ask for a copy of the no-trade list.

If Vegas says there is no no-trade list, then Verbeek should say then please give me written confirmation of that from the player's agent. I know what you're telling me, but it doesn't sound right and there might be some mistake. I can't count on what you're saying, and I need to be sure.

I'm a lawyer, and I've been having conversations like that on behalf of my clients almost every day for the past 36 years. You just don't take someone's word for it when it comes to third-party rights.

Vegas should have done the same as well.
i don't see why verbeek would feel the need to ask for confirmation from a player's agent because i don't think any GM would believe that a player's own team would be unaware of which teams are on his NTC. needing to confirm something so simple probably never crosses any GMs mind

this will surely change things though
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,628
86,193
Redmond, WA
I think it was fairly obvious that the Dadonov trade to Anaheim would get vetoed. As soon as it came out that Dadonov correctly submitted his NTC to Ottawa, it was insanely cut and dry.

The interesting thing to come out of this is what happens with Ottawa for causing this confusion to begin with and what remedies the NHL will give Vegas for the situation.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad