Now you're adding icing on the shilling.
Your lack of knowledge of who's in the 20s is your lack of knowledge, that you're trying to pass off as the common standard with,
You're not in this conversation since you don't know shit about prospects in the 20s and don't care about shit if they make it, right? Don't know why you're upset when you don't care.
=================
Your wrote:
You are admitting the GM doesn't do any long term planning.
That's like saying Verbeek trading away d-men Lindholm and Manson has nothing to do with drafting three d-men in the top-53 picks in the ensuing NHL draft. Conflate that 2022 draft and then not drafting a d-man with six picks in the first 85 selections (1 - first round, 3 - second round, and 2 -third round picks) in the 2023 draft. Yeah... no way a GM ever has long term planning. It's all randomized events that a GM has no control over at all!
=================
Comparing the talent of Cutter to Snuggerud (or Kulich) is the diversion b/c it doesn't address the asset mgmt.
Asset Mgmt
- Cutter Trade:
- Lose top pairing RD Drysdale
- Lose NHL RD Depth
- Lose 2025 second round pick
- Drafting Snuggerud at 22nd overall:
- Lose potential 3C Gaucher
That's a lot of value lost.
====================
Comparing Cutter (5th overall) vs Snuggerud (23rd overall, one pick after the Ducks)
Cutter | | | | | | | |
---|
Year | Season | League | Games | G | A | Pts | ppg |
2021-22 | D+0 | USHL | 22 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 1.27 |
| | USNTDP | 54 | 34 | 31 | 65 | 1.20 |
| | WJC-18 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 1.50 |
| | | | | | | |
2022-23 | D+1 | NCAA | 32 | 16 | 21 | 37 | 1.16 |
| | WJC-20 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 1.43 |
| | WC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 0.90 |
| | | | | | | |
2023-24 | D+2 | NCAA | 21 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 1.43 |
| | WJC-20 | 7 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 1.71 |
Snuggerud | | | | | | | |
---|
Year | Season | League | Games | G | A | Pts | ppg |
2021-22 | D+0 | USHL | 26 | 6 | 20 | 26 | 1.00 |
| | USNTDP | 59 | 24 | 39 | 63 | 1.07 |
| | WJC-18 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1.17 |
| | | | | | | |
2022-23 | D+1 | NCAA | 40 | 21 | 29 | 50 | 1.25 |
| | WJC-20 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 1.86 |
| | | | | | | |
2023-24 | D+2 | NCAA | 24 | 18 | 7 | 25 | 1.04 |
| | WJC-20 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 1.33 |
At the time of the draft, Snuggerud's skating was in question. It did improve from his D-1 to D+0 season. Cutter's skating was far better than Snuggerud's at the time of the draft.
Verbeek only cited needing a top-6 scorer, he didn't say a need for a top-line scorer. Using what Verbeek said, hey, Snuggerud fits that bill.
=============
Again, I'm ecstatic to have Cutter here. We can't change the past. He's a Ducks and I'll support him.
What I can criticize is the asset mgmt. It wasn't as if I did not question the selection of Gaucher over Snuggerud (or Kulich) at the time of the draft; I did question it. Still, I support Gaucher then and now. Verbeek admitted he doesn't have a top-6 scorer in his system, which is why the Cutter trade happened. Verbeek admitted that shit, not me. I'm pointing out why we didn't have one b/c logic exists.
But you can keep on shilling, rationalizing, and redefining what you think things should be. I'll stick to doing my research, pointing things out, and be in the minority of things while being proven correct on most things without shilling, rationalizing, or redefining things to revolved around yourself.