Benstheman
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2014
- 7,313
- 3,569
No. Not close. Take out Rakell and Ducks fans still won't like it.
Just try Nick Ritchie there.
LOL
No. Not close. Take out Rakell and Ducks fans still won't like it.
Just try Nick Ritchie there.
lmao oh how how nice of you. dont want both larsson and theodore too?
The Ducks won't allow Bieksa to eat up an expansion protection slot over a better, younger dman. His options will be waiving his NMC for the draft or being bought out of the final year of his deal. Waiving would just be a formality, Vegas won't select him.
Bieksa & Stoner are cap dumps plain and simple. Especially Bieksa with his NMC and the upcoming expansion draft (he'll have to be protected).
Anaheim has roughly $7.5M to sign Lindholm, Rakell and add their 13th forward.
IMO Anaheim should do 4 things:
1. Trade Fowler: either
A) to Boston for Spooner + 2016 3rd
-or-
B) to Detroit for Mantha + Athanasiou
-Each of these would save the Ducks roughly $3M cap space, and add youth to Anaheim's forward ranks.
2. Re-sign Lindholm long term, and Rakell to a 1/2 year contract:
Lindholm- 7yrs/$6M per
Rakell- hope he just signs a qualifier or 2yrs/$2M per.
3. Trade Bieksa with one of Montour/Larsson:
Basically a cap dump, but also opens up an extra spot to be used in expansion draft.
Are trade chips are:
Fowler
Stoner
Bieksa
Young Prospect Player
Based on what you are offering...
Fowler
2
Ennis
Buffalo want LHD and Ennis can play LW. Ennis is small but should compliment Pery/Getzlaf who but have plenty of size/strenght. Ennis has an extra year on his contract and has an AAV of +$600,000. Not an ideal 1LW but I think it could work with what your trade chips are.
Pouliot(50% retained) + Yakupov + Reinhart
For fowler + cogliano.
Marchand for Lindholm+Theodore
Bieksa & Stoner are cap dumps plain and simple. Especially Bieksa with his NMC and the upcoming expansion draft (he'll have to be protected).
Anaheim has roughly $7.5M to sign Lindholm, Rakell and add their 13th forward.
IMO Anaheim should do 4 things:
1. Trade Fowler: either
A) to Boston for Spooner + 2016 3rd
-or-
B) to Detroit for Mantha + Athanasiou
-Each of these would save the Ducks roughly $3M cap space, and add youth to Anaheim's forward ranks.
2. Re-sign Lindholm long term, and Rakell to a 1/2 year contract:
Lindholm- 7yrs/$6M per
Rakell- hope he just signs a qualifier or 2yrs/$2M per.
3. Trade Bieksa with one of Montour/Larsson:
Basically a cap dump, but also opens up an extra spot to be used in expansion draft.
No, we have not asked Calgary to give us Gaudreau for less than what you just offered JVR up for. The 15-ish point difference for now between JVR and Rakell at this point isn't really worth Montour.The way you guys talk about your D prospects...have you called Calgary and offered Theodore for Gaudreau and a first yet? I'm sure they'll take it.
Contracts exist. Lindholm alone is laughable to ask for for Marchand. Adding to him, let alone a blue chip prospect, is something else.Marchand for Lindholm+Theodore
Call up Col,and ask them for Lando?Probably take more than Fowler though
We are trying to shed some salary can't be adding Kunitz when we still have Lindholm and Rakell to re-sign. Also wouldn't trade a 2nd or a 3rd and a prospect for Kunitz even if we had no money/cap troubles.
We don't want Brown and his $5,875,000 cap hit per year for 6 seasons terrible contract. We can easily ask Bieksa to waive for expansion or buy him out.
Marchand for Lindholm+Theodore
It's be a pretty sweet deal if they did though
Bieksa & Stoner are cap dumps plain and simple. Especially Bieksa with his NMC and the upcoming expansion draft (he'll have to be protected).
Anaheim has roughly $7.5M to sign Lindholm, Rakell and add their 13th forward.
IMO Anaheim should do 4 things:
1. Trade Fowler: either
A) to Boston for Spooner + 2016 3rd
-or-
B) to Detroit for Mantha + Athanasiou
-Each of these would save the Ducks roughly $3M cap space, and add youth to Anaheim's forward ranks.
2. Re-sign Lindholm long term, and Rakell to a 1/2 year contract:
Lindholm- 7yrs/$6M per
Rakell- hope he just signs a qualifier or 2yrs/$2M per.
3. Trade Bieksa with one of Montour/Larsson:
Basically a cap dump, but also opens up an extra spot to be used in expansion draft.
i will give up on any notion of acquiring lindholm but we all know your not getting rakell to sign for 2 yrs at 2 per. what could we work around rakell ?
He needs to decide what to do then ,he either gets a lowball package for Fowler,or loses him at the expansion draft.Or he moves a very tallented young defender for a very tallented winger,and keeps FowlerThe only way Lando is going to Anaheim, Is if Lindholm goes to Colorado and i doubt that Murray has any interest in trading Lindholm.
He needs to decide what to do then ,he either gets a lowball package for Fowler,or loses him at the expansion draft.Or he moves a very tallented young defender for a very tallented winger,and keeps Fowler
I think there are a few big moves still to happen tbh ,ANA is one of those teams that should be involved.There are probably others as having this many top end RFA,s without contracts is very unusualTotally agree, Murray wont do any thing with Fowler until both Lindholm and Rakell are resigned once the worlds are over on October 2nd. But definitely agree that he needs to do something here and pretty quick.
correct me if im wrong but i get the impression the owners are somewhat tight fisted with their cash. they have an internal cap which is obviously below the salary cap. they strike me as the type then who would not be buying people out to go sit at home no ?
I think there are a few big moves still to happen tbh ,ANA is one of those teams that should be involved.There are probably others as having this many top end RFA,s without contracts is very unusual