Proposal: Ana/Col
- Thread starter Avalanche2133
- Start date
Vatican Roulette
Baile de Los Locos
Jones needs to be taken out at the very least.
Even then, the Ducks won't do it.
MackAttack26
Registered User
That package doesnt get you Fowler. Nevermind, a 1st round prospect having a great year as well. Yikes.
Ducks in a row
Go Ducks Quack Quack
Even if we trade Fowler which we don't want to do with how good he has been this season we wouldn't want Gelinas we have enough defenseman. We ain't trading Fowler and a 1st round picked player from the last draft for that. Even take out Jones wouldn't do that trade.
The Abusement Park
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2016
- 35,125
- 26,313
Not good... I think a trade for Fowler could be made, but this is not a good offer at all. Sorry Ducks fans.
Avalanche2133
Registered User
Yaaaaaaa you got me. Wasn't sure Jones value to you guys. I'm a fan. But take him out and you still don't make the deal? I think your selling Greer short.
He's been our best defenseman. I don't care how high Greer's potential is, because that's all it is right now. Anaheim isn't trading Fowler for futures.
Vinegar Strokes
Dirty Ducks
Not to mention a complete lack of need on Anaheim's end. We still have Theodore, Montour, Larsson, Welinski, and Mahura waiting behind an already young and talented blueline. There's just no reason to target a D prospect in a trade.
Any trade for Fowler would need to be centered around an equivalent forward. Think Duch, Landy or Mack.
Ducks in a row
Go Ducks Quack Quack
Greer might be a nice prospect but that is all he is a prospect and not a elite one. Fowler has been out best defenseman he is looking better then ever. With Gelinas added it lowers the value with us not wanting any defenseman. With Fowler added to Avalanche lineup that 1st round pick loses value as they are a better team. No way we trade Fowler alone for that.
The Mighty Duck Man
R-E-L-A-X
Brock Radunske
안양종합운동장 빙상장
- Aug 8, 2012
- 16,787
- 4,701
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
Quite the opposite. I don't think Fowler is available, and if he is I suspect Murray would need to be blown away by the offer.
a mangy Meowth
Ross Colton Fan
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
KaseMeOutside
Based
- Oct 18, 2011
- 44,280
- 10,205
that is one awful trade proposal
I definitely would not trade fowler alone for that, much less ADDING our no.1 pick who is having a great start in London
I definitely would not trade fowler alone for that, much less ADDING our no.1 pick who is having a great start in London
KaseMeOutside
Based
- Oct 18, 2011
- 44,280
- 10,205
you dont get a top pair dman for spare parts, i think recent history shows that quite clearly
KaseMeOutside
Based
- Oct 18, 2011
- 44,280
- 10,205
The season is barely even 10% complete, trading them fowler for nothing off their roster will improve the avs, thus the current placement means nothing
A player that has not shown any history of maintaining such a rate.
a depth dman that still has some upside
not enough for Fowler....
Depth dman has zero value to ducks
so what are you left with?
what do you people not get that fowler has been our best player this year?
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
I get a good chuckle out of seeing all the "that doesnt get you fowler comments"
A pick right now that would be top 5OA
A rookie that has 9 pts in 9 games in the AHL
a depth dman that still has some upside
not enough for Fowler....
The draft isn't right now, and that rookie is still not a good NHL player at this point.
No, it isn't enough for Fowler. Would you trade Gardiner for that? I'd be surprised, and Fowler is a better player than Gardiner. Believe it or not, trading an established and very good young player for future question marks is not the key to being a good team.
But, to be honest, I'm not surprised you feel this way. You said Carrick was too much for Fowler. I think that says it all. Whether it's you underrating Fowler, overrating potential, or both, you clearly don't have a good grasp on what an established top pairing defenseman like Fowler is worth.
Ducks in a row
Go Ducks Quack Quack
I get a good chuckle out of seeing all the "that doesnt get you fowler comments"
A pick right now that would be top 5OA
A rookie that has 9 pts in 9 games in the AHL
a depth dman that still has some upside
not enough for Fowler....
A pick that will be worse with them adding Fowler to their blueline.
A forward prospect who hasn't proven anything except doing well in the AHL in a small sample size we have seen players before do well in the AHL and it doesn't always mean they will be productive in the NHL.
A defenseman we don't want and need with that being our strength of our franchise.
Getting a bunch of gambling parts for a young top pair defenseman
Halla
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2016
- 14,727
- 3,779
I would 100% trade gardiner for that. Colorado isnt good...thats gonna be a top 10 pick. Greer is a very good prospect. gelinas is a toss in
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
A top 10 pick in a questionable draft. Where do I sign up?
You can have your mystery box. I'll take the player that is carrying Anaheim's blue line.
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)- Latest: Machinehead
-
-
