- Apr 27, 2005
- 35,400
- 34,150
2006-2024What time line did you choose?
Here is the last 10 years:
Again, no relationship
Last 10 years^^Not that I care to get in the sand on your numbers, but how would those numbers look with an adjusted sample?
Post cap we had PIT, CHI, VAN, LAK, DET with their tables set with superstars. I think, to really debunk the tax debate, it would make sense to look at the most recent 10 year sample, as the cap had been in place for a number of years at that point.
If it's not having an effect on outcomes then there is no problem to solve.Because at the end of the day we’re talking about a sport. A sport with so many variables that we can’t look at 1 simple thing and determine an outcome.
That doesn’t take away the fact that there’s teams with more buying power than others. Even if it’s slight.
All these "tax adjustment" ideas are solutions looking for a problem.