Tune in for Season 1 of Jane Bond! Streaming on Prime January 2027!
We haven't gotten a great Bond film since "Casino Royale" so this isn't completely disappointing. Amazon has little good faith to trust them with handling something like this however so I'm sure we're going to get a bunch of mid-content. Pending great reviews I'll be staying far away.
Inconceivable!View attachment 979735
Wonder how much they paid her for control.
This an be a good thing if they cast well like for Reacher or terrible like for Ring of Power..
I don’t think it’s a death knell, I just think it’s the continued over saturation of media. James Bond is at his best when there’s a few years between entries, and now there will probably be 100 episodes of various in-universe spinoffsInconceivable!
I don't get all the hullabaloo. Daniel Craig was good in his first two movies. Before that, the last good Bond was GoldenEye.
The series as a whole has way more stinkers than good movies. I don't think this is the death knell people are making it out to be
Exactly. There's been some pretty bad Bond movies, but you kind of knew there will be good ones here and there. Because at the end of the day the franchise had too much prestige to continuously f*** it up.I don’t think it’s a death knell, I just think it’s the continued over saturation of media. James Bond is at his best when there’s a few years between entries, and now there will probably be 100 episodes of various in-universe spinoffs
There are absolutely times when I'm in the mood to watch Moonraker instead of From Russia With Love.The "last good Bond" film talk sounds like film nerd shit, I'm sorry. First, it's never been a series known for consistent quality. Second, even when it's kinda bad, it's still a fun popcorn flick and doesn't strive to be anything more.
I don't have any loyalty to it. I'm not British and I'm younger than 50. But people get really wound up about it.
He's the good guy now and he has to fight government overreach and an agent trying to stop him from making the world a better place.So, I guess the billionaire megalomaniac hell bent on world domination will no longer be portrayed as a villain.
Well, then they'd have to hire a bunch of different actors to play the role. Doubt, 1 person wants to be tied to that role. I mean, the Reacher actor does this 8 part series and can do other roles in between (though, for Reacher, he can't drop the weight for other roles, since it's so hard to put it back on. Basically has to be like the Rock and maintain that size until the Reacher series are done).Hopefully they don't milk the shit out of it by releasing a dozen different TV series over the next decade.
That said, I would watch a Bond period drama set in the 50s or 60s.
The "last good Bond" film talk sounds like film nerd shit, I'm sorry. First, it's never been a series known for consistent quality. Second, even when it's kinda bad, it's still a fun popcorn flick and doesn't strive to be anything more.
I don't have any loyalty to it. I'm not British and I'm younger than 50. But people get really wound up about it.
See that I wouldn’t mind if done right. Been reading some of the newer books written by Anthony Horowitz and they’re good. They take place a little after WW2.It is now being suggested (here in the UK) that Amazon may have different Bond going in different eras. Including starting with a Bond set during ww2 or 1