The Panther
Registered User
Thinking about it, Jagr probably is a bit under-rated. I mean, there was a significant period there where he was the best skater in the game (c.1995 to 2001, minus Mario in 1995-96). His "under-rating", I think, suffers from three things:
1) Followed Gretzky and Lemieux as top NHL scorer; his scoring numbers couldn't quite compare (yet were way better than anybody who followed). Onset of Dead-Puck era coinciding with his peak didn't help that.
2) Five scoring titles and a Hart trophy sounds enormous (and is), but it very easily could have been that much more. Even in 1996-97 he was basically pacing Mario, but he missed 19 games. (In 2000, he won the scoring title missing 19 games, and was actually on pace for 125 points at the height of the DPE, while the next-best scorer had 94 points.) In 2005-06 (aged 33), he was leading the League in scoring pretty much the whole season, but then suddenly crapped out in the final week, allowing Joe Thornton to take the Art Ross and the Hart.
Certainly he could easily have had six scoring titles (adding 2006, but for that bad last week), and probably should have had at least two Harts (possible three, as he might have won in '95 too).
3) His personality when he was young. There was nothing at all wrong with it, but since he was an 'outside-the-box', original thinker, he didn't fit NHL social circles easily while in his prime. The NHL old-skoolers took a slightly dim view of him.
I certainly don't rate him as high as #5, but I do think he's well up there in the top 10, well ahead of guys like Crosby and Ovechkin, who have received twice the column inches.
1) Followed Gretzky and Lemieux as top NHL scorer; his scoring numbers couldn't quite compare (yet were way better than anybody who followed). Onset of Dead-Puck era coinciding with his peak didn't help that.
2) Five scoring titles and a Hart trophy sounds enormous (and is), but it very easily could have been that much more. Even in 1996-97 he was basically pacing Mario, but he missed 19 games. (In 2000, he won the scoring title missing 19 games, and was actually on pace for 125 points at the height of the DPE, while the next-best scorer had 94 points.) In 2005-06 (aged 33), he was leading the League in scoring pretty much the whole season, but then suddenly crapped out in the final week, allowing Joe Thornton to take the Art Ross and the Hart.
Certainly he could easily have had six scoring titles (adding 2006, but for that bad last week), and probably should have had at least two Harts (possible three, as he might have won in '95 too).
3) His personality when he was young. There was nothing at all wrong with it, but since he was an 'outside-the-box', original thinker, he didn't fit NHL social circles easily while in his prime. The NHL old-skoolers took a slightly dim view of him.
I certainly don't rate him as high as #5, but I do think he's well up there in the top 10, well ahead of guys like Crosby and Ovechkin, who have received twice the column inches.