I thought you said he was the worst one on the team defensively? This one says he's average defensively?
These are purely rhetorical questions by the way. I buy that he's been average defensively.
Player Discussion: All purpose: Zach Werenski thread
- Thread starter spintheblackcircle
- Start date
I thought you said he was the worst one on the team defensively? This one says he's average defensively?
These are purely rhetorical questions by the way. I buy that he's been average defensively.
people on this board painting werenski as a gostisbehere type offensive defenseman absolutely do not know puck.
there are some things that simply aren't part of his game – he doesn't throw huge hits, he can be a bit too casual with the puck in 3v3 situations and he doesn't anticipate potential clears on the power play very well. but there's a lot more to defense than hitting, and a lot more to generating offense as a defenseman than running a power play.
despite that, he's quite good at both ends of the ice. he's one of the best stick defenders in the league. he's effective at carrying the puck on the rush and effective at creating chances in the o-zone. he's a legit top pairing guy and is the absolute last guy in this defensive core that people should be complaining about.
there are some things that simply aren't part of his game – he doesn't throw huge hits, he can be a bit too casual with the puck in 3v3 situations and he doesn't anticipate potential clears on the power play very well. but there's a lot more to defense than hitting, and a lot more to generating offense as a defenseman than running a power play.
despite that, he's quite good at both ends of the ice. he's one of the best stick defenders in the league. he's effective at carrying the puck on the rush and effective at creating chances in the o-zone. he's a legit top pairing guy and is the absolute last guy in this defensive core that people should be complaining about.
The only real complaint is that he plays so much PP and that's not really his fault but coaching issue.
I said he's the worst defensive "#1 dman" in the league and that still holds true.
No one is calling him the worst defensively player on the team, he's bang average and can't handle #1 minutes because the rest of the team is such ass. People act like he's a surefire #1 and he's just not that good defensively.
Yeah no. Many of the #1s aren't even "bang average" defensively.
If they can't play well in all situations, they're probably not a #1 defenseman. Someone has to play in that spot for every team, doesn't mean they should.
Double-Shift Lasse
Just post better
This begs the question how many #1 defensemen in the league. Some people will say there’s one for every team but you’ve already said here there may not be. So, how many, per your criteria?
There's probably 20 guys who everyone would agree on, maybe less. My point is that Z isn't well rounded enough to make up for the rest of this awful defense.
Double-Shift Lasse
Just post better
This makes it seem your beef is with the defensive roster but your posting has consistently bashed Werenski.
That's fair and I can see why you think that.
For me, Z isn't good enough to carry the load. It's not really his fault, the whole d core generally isn't good. My "thing" is with all the posters that think Z is some great all around dman when really he's just the best dman on a very bad d core.
Add in the fact what he makes along with his d zone play and I find his whole game frustrating to watch for what he's getting paid.
Once again, that's more on Jarmo for giving him all that money and assembling an overall terrible d core.
Werenski is currently a smidge behind Cale Makar for the league lead in 5v5 scoring rate for defensemen.
What a season he's having. He'd be right up there with the top few D in the league if he was any good on the PP.
What a season he's having. He'd be right up there with the top few D in the league if he was any good on the PP.
EspenK
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2011
- 15,845
- 4,450
Interesting that he ranks second to only Hedman in first assists and he doesn't have Kuch, Stamkos & Point et al to pass to. Those stats are pretty impressive.
The offense has never actually been an issue with Werenski. His vision/passing is a bit limited, but, his shooting ability makes up for it. He’s also not a great skater.
Werenski has shown to be an absolute weapon on the PP (yet less impactful than Jones), but, some people now somehow think he’s a “problem”. Boqvist a better option?! The problem isn’t Werenski not being able to pass to a certain RH shooter, it’s the lack of adaptability and versatility of that guy.
The problem with Werenski has always been his inability to consistently make good decisions defensively, while also much of the time lacking the “intensity” or physical play you would like to see out of 1 of your “leaders” or “best players”. That’s still the case and the injuries have clearly not helped in this regard.
Will be interesting to see how Mateychuk-Werenski looks after a period of time. Again, I look at him as a “problem” the same way I look at Jenner as a problem. But, the defense (like the center position) still needs to be built correctly (aka different) in order for them to truly excel. IMO
Werenski has shown to be an absolute weapon on the PP (yet less impactful than Jones), but, some people now somehow think he’s a “problem”. Boqvist a better option?! The problem isn’t Werenski not being able to pass to a certain RH shooter, it’s the lack of adaptability and versatility of that guy.
The problem with Werenski has always been his inability to consistently make good decisions defensively, while also much of the time lacking the “intensity” or physical play you would like to see out of 1 of your “leaders” or “best players”. That’s still the case and the injuries have clearly not helped in this regard.
Will be interesting to see how Mateychuk-Werenski looks after a period of time. Again, I look at him as a “problem” the same way I look at Jenner as a problem. But, the defense (like the center position) still needs to be built correctly (aka different) in order for them to truly excel. IMO
koteka
Registered User
Xoggz22
Registered User
Had he not missed 12 games he would likely have easily set the points record by a defenseman for the CBJ. He's had a hell of a year in my book given the challenges this team has/had.
All I want to do is add my 2c and say that points aren’t the same as they used to be years ago.
Spacek’s PP/PK TOI numbers are fascinating to look at. I remember being told that Wisniewski being given all that PP TOI, had no impact on him getting points. Ahh, the good ole days.
I genuinely wonder what people would pay to get Jones back. Jiricek+Laine+ what?
Werenski-Jones
Mateychuk-Severson
CBJWerenski8
Rest in Peace Johnny
- Jun 13, 2009
- 43,751
- 26,822
I'd give them Laine and something else but I'm not putting in Jiricek. Maybe they'd like Bean or Boqvist back.
RHD set up of Jones, Severson, and Jiricek sounds good to me.
As far as Z goes, he's had a great year. He may not be a shutdown type of D-man on a defensive core that definitely needs one. But he's far and away our best D and not the root of our problems. If the new GM decides to trade Jenner (which I doubt given ownerships attachment to him), I wouldn't blink twice at naming Z the captain.
Double-Shift Lasse
Just post better
Z may be a better D for having played with Jones. I don't think his game is above reproach, but so many folks are so hung up on Zach's game that it kind of snowballs and the narrative becomes their truth. I dig him, I dig his game and I'm glad he's a Jacket. He made a decision to stay right after Jones made a decision not to.
So yeah I love Seth's game in a vacuum but I'm not throwing a bunch of assets into trying to re-acquire him. He essentially asked out right at a time when he could have chosen to be part of the team's core and leadership moving forward, and instead he opted not to work out an extension. So we lost a very good player - although not a drag his teammates in the fight kind of guy - but it was his choice. Not a guy I'm spending a whole lot of mental energy on.
So yeah I love Seth's game in a vacuum but I'm not throwing a bunch of assets into trying to re-acquire him. He essentially asked out right at a time when he could have chosen to be part of the team's core and leadership moving forward, and instead he opted not to work out an extension. So we lost a very good player - although not a drag his teammates in the fight kind of guy - but it was his choice. Not a guy I'm spending a whole lot of mental energy on.
EspenK
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2011
- 15,845
- 4,450
No interest in Jones.
His game has slipped while Werenski got better. And there's six more years left on Jones' contract after this year.
Ekholm is 1st. Then Hedman, then Werenski.
His game has slipped while Werenski got better. And there's six more years left on Jones' contract after this year.
Who is 2nd? unless the whole chart didn't open it looks like 2nd to me.
Ekholm is 1st. Then Hedman, then Werenski.
EspenK
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2011
- 15,845
- 4,450
Don't see Ekholm on the list but I'll take your word. Anyway 3rd is impressive,
He makes a lot low effort plays defensively that I think would set a bad precedent as a captain.
Z is great creating offense on his own but this team desperately needs an all around defenseman that can cover for him.
Iron Balls McGinty
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2005
- 9,168
- 7,262
Well, Jarmo felt it wasn't important when he shipped of Savard and Gavrikov for a d corps full all offensive players. And their play is certainly offensive. He didn't want to pay Gavrikov but then he got conned into acquiring Provorov as a replacement for the money Gavrikov wanted and probably deserved. Getting Bean and Boqvist and relying on them heavily to become difference makers was the beginning of his downfall.
