Rumor: All Purpose Trade Proposals, Speculation and Rumours - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.

JetsFan815

Replacement Level Poster
Jan 16, 2012
19,640
25,628
I don't want any big moves with our rumored guys. Wanna read that Ehlers has been re-signed long term and let the process play out with Rutger, no reason to rush with that trade.

Getting rid of Pionk would be amazing but asking for too much I guess.
 

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
10,699
16,578
How do you propose that we add an 8.5 million dment to our cap structure by sending out a prospect?
Now that's some mediocre winnipeg thinking there... sergachev? Oh we can't afford a guy like that...

You wouldn't buyout pionk and Schmidt to run a top four of
Jomo-demelo
Serg-samberg

Your cap change with the extra buyout hit is 5 million to add sergachev and a third pairing min wager
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,723
74,544
Winnipeg
Now that's some mediocre winnipeg thinking there... sergachev? Oh we can't afford a guy like that...

You wouldn't buyout pionk and Schmidt to run a top four of
Jomo-demelo
Serg-samberg

Your cap change with the extra buyout hit is 5 million to add sergachev and a third pairing min wager

You'd still have to clear a bunch of space while still needing to sign Perfetti and perhaps Monohan. So who are we shipping out outside of a Schmidt buyout that clears said space.

Also Geekie is likely a higher rated prospect then McGroarty and plays C to boot with a huge size advantage. There is absolutely no saying that Tampa would be ok moving him for McGroarty ahead of Geekie.
 

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,131
31,205
You'd still have to clear a bunch of space while still needing to sign Perfetti and perhaps Monohan. So who are we shipping out outside of a Schmidt buyout that clears said space.

Also Geekie is likely a higher rated prospect then McGroarty and plays C to boot with a huge size advantage. There is absolutely no saying that Tampa would be ok moving him for McGroarty ahead of Geekie.
also add in moser + a 2025 2nd
 
  • Like
Reactions: surixon

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
10,699
16,578
You'd still have to clear a bunch of space while still needing to sign Perfetti and perhaps Monohan. So who are we shipping out outside of a Schmidt buyout that clears said space.

Also Geekie is likely a higher rated prospect then McGroarty and plays C to boot with a huge size advantage. There is absolutely no saying that Tampa would be ok moving him for McGroarty ahead of Geekie.
Last week no one wanted to trade mcgro for geekie hahaha

Who cares about monahan if you have the chance to add serg

We had mcgro, a very good 2nd this year, heinola - even Barron if you have to

Serg makes us an elite dcore
 
  • Like
Reactions: robertocarlos

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
39,831
26,710
Five Hills
Last week no one wanted to trade mcgro for geekie hahaha

Who cares about monahan if you have the chance to add serg

We had mcgro, a very good 2nd this year, heinola - even Barron if you have to

Serg makes us an elite dcore

I would have traded McG for Geekie. We could do far worse. Look what Philly got for Gauthier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,131
31,205
weibe on the kenny/renny show said that iaffalo is a name that has popped up this weekend that could potentially be moved
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
39,831
26,710
Five Hills
I just demonstrated that we do - or could have with very simple motivation

I honestly don't think we could have beat out Utah there. Moser is a decent young Dman who will come cheap for Tampa and Geekie is a great prospect. I don't know who we add to McG to make that work. Maybe they would have some interest in Samberg or Heinola but I think Moser is more covetted then either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RestlessYoungZero
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad