sansabri
Registered User
- Aug 12, 2005
- 32,674
- 8,573
doesn't WWE own Cena's nameJade Cargill is her real name though.
doesn't WWE own Cena's nameJade Cargill is her real name though.
I think so. They owned Cody Rhodes name for a long ass time too.doesn't WWE own Cena's name
You'd think there's no legal way to own someone's gov name but here we are lolI think so. They owned Cody Rhodes name for a long ass time too.
Since others may go down the same throught process I did I will save you the time. He was born Runnels then legally changed his name while a teenager in high school to Cody Garrett Runnels Rhodes. So he kind of is Cody Rhodes however maybe he has two last names or moved Runnels to be a middle name then solely Rhodes as his last name.You'd think there's no legal way to own someone's gov name but here we are lol
so does WWE own just 'John Cena' or his full name?Since others may go down the same throught process I did I will save you the time. He was born Runnels then legally changed his name while a teenager in high school to Cody Garrett Runnels Rhodes. So he kind of is Cody Rhodes however maybe he has two last names or moved Runnels to be a middle name then solely Rhodes as his last name.
I dont know how Copyright and trademark laws work but are you telling me if John Cena goes to AEW, he can't be called John Cena?
I had no idea that was possible.Well they can if they let him and they would get a cut of his merch and stuff. But yes, WWE owns the rights to Cena's name and gets a cut off his movie deals as a result.
It's why a bunch of talent don't ever really have a big issue with name changes as fans do, since it allows them to keep the trademark on their normal name.
But isn't that his real name? How could you own the rights to someone's real name?Well they can if they let him and they would get a cut of his merch and stuff. But yes, WWE owns the rights to Cena's name and gets a cut off his movie deals as a result.
It's why a bunch of talent don't ever really have a big issue with name changes as fans do, since it allows them to keep the trademark on their normal name.
They've done a televised event there already.With WWE going to a bunch of unique places as of late, it's about time Australia gets a show. That crowd will be electric.
Yeah, like 6 years ago. That’s not exactly frequent.They've done a televised event there already.
That was the Undertaker and Triple H going like 45 minutes in the main event.Yeah, like 6 years ago. That’s not exactly frequent.
I mean, she is very meh in the ring and she needs to be produced more... so WWE is probably the best place for her.The shills who said she was awful will now all of a sudden love her.
For sure. But she “sucked” and was “useless” a few months ago.I mean, she is very meh in the ring and she needs to be produced more... so WWE is probably the best place for her.
For sure. But she “sucked” and was “useless” a few months ago.
No, it’ll be Nattie.Watch her first challenge be Nia Jax.