All Bruins Trade Proposals/Rumours XI
- Thread starter Gee Wally
- Start date
- Status
Would love to see a big addition today to the Bruins prefer Duchene, but would take Landeskog at the right price of course. Whether we make a big deal or not there are a few smaller ones I would like to see as well or in addition to a big move.
1. Trade Koko's rights to the Blues for Sobtoka's rights.
2. Trade Khudobin and Grezlcyk to the Islanders for Halak at 50% retained or to Tampa for Budaj.
3. Trade Hayes to the Pens for Fehr.
4. Maybe a rental like Vanek or Vrbata if the cost is low.
If we do a deal with Tampa I would also look at expanding it to try and get someone like Johnson, Palat or dream scenario Kucherov.
Maybe we add a D as well someone like habs did with Davidson, I would have traded Moore for him.
1. Trade Koko's rights to the Blues for Sobtoka's rights.
2. Trade Khudobin and Grezlcyk to the Islanders for Halak at 50% retained or to Tampa for Budaj.
3. Trade Hayes to the Pens for Fehr.
4. Maybe a rental like Vanek or Vrbata if the cost is low.
If we do a deal with Tampa I would also look at expanding it to try and get someone like Johnson, Palat or dream scenario Kucherov.
Maybe we add a D as well someone like habs did with Davidson, I would have traded Moore for him.
Pia8988
Registered User
- May 26, 2014
- 14,659
- 9,232
If they retain 50% and we can ship out Khudobin in the deal then I would do it, but not if we have to pay his full salary then it is a no. I would prefer Budaj anyway offer Khudobin and Fitzgerald or Grezlcyk.
Blowfish
Count down ...
5pointslow
Registered User
no moves would be ideal, team seems to be playing well as a team right now
unless its hayes or belesky
only move id like to add is another goalie for depth
unless its hayes or belesky
only move id like to add is another goalie for depth
Oates2Neely
Registered User
RustyBruins72
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2005
- 4,823
- 1,967
7 hours until......
"The prices were too high"
"We like our team moving forward"
"We will do some evaluating in the off season before the draft."
"The prices were too high"
"We like our team moving forward"
"We will do some evaluating in the off season before the draft."
Rubber Biscuit
Registered User
7 hours until......
"The prices were too high"
"We like our team moving forward"
"We will do some evaluating in the off season before the draft."
I see no issue with that this year. Is there a player available who improves this team now and in the future?
Flannelman
Quiet, Gnashgab.
- Dec 3, 2006
- 13,880
- 3,148
5pointslow
Registered User
every year every one want that big trade ect ..... lets be realistic
why give up assets ? we have a lot of young prospects and teams playing well right now.
if the team was not playing well together and there needed to be a shake up , then go for it .
Does anyone really think one player makes us a stanley cup team this year ?
trade a small piece for somthing maybe but nothing major. we are currently winning and playing well as a team why wouyld you want to disturb that.
if you want a fairy tale trade there is nhl17
why give up assets ? we have a lot of young prospects and teams playing well right now.
if the team was not playing well together and there needed to be a shake up , then go for it .
Does anyone really think one player makes us a stanley cup team this year ?
trade a small piece for somthing maybe but nothing major. we are currently winning and playing well as a team why wouyld you want to disturb that.
if you want a fairy tale trade there is nhl17
Bmessy
Registered User
RustyBruins72
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2005
- 4,823
- 1,967
The cupboard is full enough to withstand a rental.
I'd like to see the GM make his team better so they don't miss the playoffs by a point for the 3rd straight year.
If he can make a deal with a player with term, even better.
At the very least a backup goalie.
you would do this only if you got an asset for doing so.
swapping Belesky as part of it to get off that contract would be good.
would like to see if they took Halak off their hands with no cash back and could get Leddy for doing so.
would this get it done for Landeskog:
one of:
Zboril or Lauzon
One of:
Heinen or Debrusk
1'st round pick
Belesky
one of:
Zboril or Lauzon
One of:
Heinen or Debrusk
1'st round pick
Belesky
Jean_Jacket41
Neely = HOF
I would do this.
Marchand-Bergy-Backes
Cehlarik-Krejci-Pasta
Landeskog-Spooner-Vatrano
Deep top-9.
ON3M4N
Ignores/60 = Elite
2017 1st round pick, Zboril, Heinen and either Beleskey or Hayes definitely would do it for sure. We could keep Beleskey out and deal him elsewhere also throw in Subban to help a bit I guess.
Happy "Trades are Hard" Day!!!
Everyone excited for the press conference to talk about the exorbitant cost for rentals, how good we feel about the team and how excited we are for the future?
I for one am pumped.
Everyone excited for the press conference to talk about the exorbitant cost for rentals, how good we feel about the team and how excited we are for the future?
I for one am pumped.
World of Wardlow
Unscripted Violence
BruinDust
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 25,319
- 24,242
Any interest in Ryan Miller as a back-up option for the right price.
I wouldn't give up much of value, but he's UFA this summer.
And if Boston doesn't do anything else, they should be able to take on the remainder of his full cap hit. (i.e. Vancouver wouldn't have to retain).
I wouldn't give up much of value, but he's UFA this summer.
And if Boston doesn't do anything else, they should be able to take on the remainder of his full cap hit. (i.e. Vancouver wouldn't have to retain).
- Status
