All Bruins Trade Proposals/Rumours X

Status
Not open for further replies.

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,419
3,072
About what? They weren't in the playoffs. That isn't opinion. We can't disagree on that. what use would a non playoff teams 7th dman or 13th forward be to a playoff bound team?

Experienced vets are added for depth. You can never really have enough. Remember relying on Hnidy in the playoffs?
 

Gordoff

Formerly: Strafer
Jan 18, 2003
26,345
27,905
The Hub
Webster???:laugh::laugh::laugh:

I think not.

Bound basically means Headed or intending to head in a specified direction. My opinion is their bound to be a playoff team nothing more than that.
Perhaps you just described yourself and shuldn't be so hasty and Magniloquent.

LOL, It must be a language thing because you're making my point for me. No matter what opinion someone takes here someone else comes along and wants to start a nonsensical argument up over something inconsequential.

"Magniloquent." Priceless!:biglaugh::rolly::lol:
 

Montecristo

Registered User
Jul 29, 2012
6,932
2,162
Experienced vets are added for depth. You can never really have enough. Remember relying on Hnidy in the playoffs?

No i don't. The year they won the cup are you talking about? He played 3 games during that run and played 9 total minutes
 

ORR2Sanderson2ORR

Bobby Orr Scores
Aug 24, 2005
3,771
879
Everywhere
LOL, It must be a language thing because you're making my point for me. No matter what opinion someone takes here someone else comes along and wants to start a nonsensical argument up over something inconsequential.

"Magniloquent." Priceless!:biglaugh::rolly::lol:

:huh: Argument??? : "You-are a real Scholar".

By the way I'm being facetious.
 
Last edited:

ODAAT

Registered User
Oct 17, 2006
52,688
21,597
Victoria BC
very very quiet considering deadline is a few days away....

not shocking, the last few have been the same. Too many teams who are so close to a playoff spot who just won`t be in sellers mode and those who are in sellers mode sure aren`t giving away their assets for free

If you had plans on watching the 12 hour trade deadline marathon`s on any network, my suggestion, don`t. We`ll see little more than 3/4th liners, depth players being moved IMO

Friedman on HNIC said that anyone thinking that Sakic would lower his price as the deadline nears would be wrong, he`s under no pressure to move them let alone move them on the cheap
 

The Special K

Hoss MOFO, Hoss.
Sep 26, 2008
3,606
17
Canal Winchester, OH
not shocking, the last few have been the same. Too many teams who are so close to a playoff spot who just won`t be in sellers mode and those who are in sellers mode sure aren`t giving away their assets for free

If you had plans on watching the 12 hour trade deadline marathon`s on any network, my suggestion, don`t. We`ll see little more than 3/4th liners, depth players being moved IMO

Friedman on HNIC said that anyone thinking that Sakic would lower his price as the deadline nears would be wrong, he`s under no pressure to move them let alone move them on the cheap

Good. I don't want either of them. Honestly, the only aves player I might want is Zadorov. Put in the right situation, hey may become a solid 2 way d-man.
 

ODAAT

Registered User
Oct 17, 2006
52,688
21,597
Victoria BC
Good. I don't want either of them. Honestly, the only aves player I might want is Zadorov. Put in the right situation, hey may become a solid 2 way d-man.

I honestly think we`ll see DS wait until the summer, kind of stay the course this deadline which is wise IMO. Of course, if the B`s miss the playoffs fans will scream that he did nothing to improve the club which is arguable seeing as the price tag out there on players is crazy

If there is something I would like to see is DS trying to move out a Liles, maybe recapturing that 3rd round pick he lost last year
 

Oates2Neely

Registered User
Jan 19, 2010
19,876
14,749
Massachusetts
Good. I don't want either of them. Honestly, the only aves player I might want is Zadorov. Put in the right situation, hey may become a solid 2 way d-man.

Agreed. While both good players, neither fills a major hole in the Boston lineup. Not worth overpaying anyhow. The blue line needs to be constructed. The focus should be there. With Marchand Vatrano Pastrnak Backes here, and Bjork DeBrusk etc in the pipeline, wings look solid in the present and future.

I'd like for Sweeney to head into the offseason and keep an eye on Minnesota & Carolina. If he's going to cough up some of the solid assets he's accumulated, I'd rather he do it for a Hannifin, Faulk, Brodin, Spurgeon, etc. Not for a Landeskog
 

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,419
3,072
No i don't. The year they won the cup are you talking about? He played 3 games during that run and played 9 total minutes

But that's the issue. We needed him in those games but couldn't rely on him forcing the other d to play more. Liles wouldn't create that issue. We wouldn't get some monster return for him because he'd only be picked up as depth.
 

Sharp Shooting Neely

Registered User
May 30, 2007
2,041
7
Nova Scotia
As noted in the comments below from a Pro Sports daily article, Grioux has struggled mightily this season and particularly of late. Should the Flyers look to go with an overhaul would they possibly pull off another surprise Richards/Carter trade? The motivating factors in making such a move for these players are very different. A move of that significance would likely have to be an off season transaction rather than a trade deadline one should they consider going that route.

"If center Claude Giroux doesn't start producing, the Philadelphia Flyers won't start winning, and their fading Stanley Cup Playoff hopes will disappear.

"It goes hand in hand," Flyers coach Dave Hakstol said Friday.
The evidence supports Hakstol's words.

Giroux has 12 points (three goals, nine assists) in the past 28 games. The Flyers are 9-15-4 in those games. He had 12 points (five goals, seven assists) in 10 games from Nov. 27-Dec. 14. The Flyers went 10-0.
Philadelphia is 19-12-3 in games when Giroux has at least one point this season; it is 9-13-4 when he gets shut out.

Get the picture?

Giroux does. He knows how valuable he is to the Flyers, how he sets the tone with his work ethic and production. He knows he has to begin producing and that he can't wait, that he has to start by delivering in the 2017 Coors Light NHL Stadium Series game against the Pittsburgh Penguins at Heinz Field on Saturday (8 p.m. ET; NBC, SN, TVA Sports 2, NHL.TV).

It's a big event, but it's also arguably the biggest game of the season for the Flyers, who are five points out of a playoff spot in the Eastern Conference with 22 games remaining and have a general manager, Ron Hextall, trying to figure out if he should be a seller with the 2017 NHL Trade Deadline approaching (March 1 at 3 p.m. ET). Hextall said Friday he will not be a deadline buyer."
 

Oates2Neely

Registered User
Jan 19, 2010
19,876
14,749
Massachusetts
Nashville paid a 4th for Vernon Fiddler early this month, I think that's what we can expect Moore to fetch if moved.

Penguins scooped up Hainsey, he looked solid yesterday.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,373
11,695
Good. I don't want either of them. Honestly, the only aves player I might want is Zadorov. Put in the right situation, hey may become a solid 2 way d-man.

I'd rather not deal for Landeskog or Duchene either, because of the price.... but about Zadorov:

1) They aren't dealing him, because their biggest weakness is D. He's young, he's cheap, he isn't horrible. He's one of the guys they want to keep.

2) Personally, I'm not a fan of him at all. Very poor decision making and low hockey IQ. He's big, he hits and I get that makes him popular, but I don't think he'll be a "2 way" guy at all (zero goals this year, 10 assists).

He's a young Alexei Emelin with maybe a touch more upside.
 

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
9,240
9,911
Moncton NB
I'd rather not deal for Landeskog or Duchene either, because of the price.... but about Zadorov:

1) They aren't dealing him, because their biggest weakness is D. He's young, he's cheap, he isn't horrible. He's one of the guys they want to keep.

2) Personally, I'm not a fan of him at all. Very poor decision making and low hockey IQ. He's big, he hits and I get that makes him popular, but I don't think he'll be a "2 way" guy at all (zero goals this year, 10 assists).

He's a young Alexei Emelin with maybe a touch more upside.

Zadorov is also injured and out for the rest of the season.
 

KnightofBoston

Registered User
Mar 22, 2010
20,132
6,800
The Valley of Pioneers
I'm glad the Bruins are not in rumors

I hope they don't make a single trade other than to unload a guy that doesn't have a future here and won't be drafted by Vegas anyways


They have enough to make the playoffs, its in their hands, and there isn't a single deal out here that will a) guarantee them a playoff spot and b) put them over any kind of hump that would indicate they'll contend for a cup


Keep the cupboard stocked and play your ass off, I can't bear another round of picks for guys that help us place 9th.
 

Ryan77

Registered User
Jan 3, 2015
491
24
I'm glad the Bruins are not in rumors

I hope they don't make a single trade other than to unload a guy that doesn't have a future here and won't be drafted by Vegas anyways


They have enough to make the playoffs, its in their hands, and there isn't a single deal out here that will a) guarantee them a playoff spot and b) put them over any kind of hump that would indicate they'll contend for a cup


Keep the cupboard stocked and play your ass off, I can't bear another round of picks for guys that help us place 9th.

Here's what I don't get Chiarelli makes the playoffs 8 of 9 years and misses one year. In that year Krecji missed half the season and Chara missed 30 games and gets canned.

If Bruins miss this year it will be three in a row for Sweeney yet not even on the hot seat and the team is arguably worse.
 

JAD

Old School
Sponsor
Nov 19, 2009
3,246
4,490
Florida
Here's what I don't get Chiarelli makes the playoffs 8 of 9 years and misses one year. In that year Krecji missed half the season and Chara missed 30 games and gets canned.

If Bruins miss this year it will be three in a row for Sweeney yet not even on the hot seat and the team is arguably worse.

No, this is Sweeney's second year.

Plus, Chiarelli missed his first year as well as the last.

But PC was fired for other reasons beyond just missing the playoffs.
 

Ryan77

Registered User
Jan 3, 2015
491
24
No, this is Sweeney's second year

Sorry meant three years in a row missed playoffs.

Just saying though IMO Sweeney should be on the hot seat. Bruins always spend close to the cap and two years missed is not acceptable IMO
 

JAD

Old School
Sponsor
Nov 19, 2009
3,246
4,490
Florida
No, this is Sweeney's second year
Sorry meant three years in a row missed playoffs.

Just saying though IMO Sweeney should be on the hot seat. Bruins always spend close to the cap and two years missed is not acceptable IMO

My opinion is that when considering everything Sweeney inherited he has done a decent job of setting the Bruins up to be maybe very competitive for several years; even though people may not like the current on ice product. Need to remember this season is not over yet.
 
Last edited:

ranold26

Tuukka likes the post...
May 28, 2003
21,848
8,067
Shattenkirk refused a 40m deal with a new club..... and it wasn't Tampa Bay.
 

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,419
3,072
Here's what I don't get Chiarelli makes the playoffs 8 of 9 years and misses one year. In that year Krecji missed half the season and Chara missed 30 games and gets canned.

If Bruins miss this year it will be three in a row for Sweeney yet not even on the hot seat and the team is arguably worse.

Chia also traded Segs which was a huge mistake and trade johnny B. He put the team in cap trouble with all his ntc nmc. Not that Sweeney isn't doing the same. But Chia had to move segs and johnny because Kelly had a nmc but they didn't. He made a lot of mistakes.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,319
24,237
Shattenkirk refused a 40m deal with a new club..... and it wasn't Tampa Bay.

Well unless it was a 6 year deal, I don't blame him for turning down 40 million from any club. He'll get more than that on July 1st.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad