There’s a decent chance he’s considered our best forward by the end of this year. It’s really hard to come up with a number that’s too high on an 8 year deal that won’t look good in a couple years with a rising cap.
There’s a decent chance he’s considered our best forward by the end of this year. It’s really hard to come up with a number that’s too high on an 8 year deal that won’t look good in a couple years with a rising cap.
its not a hard leap from 50+ even strength points to an 80 pt season with pp1 time.Off to a terrific start, but part of me wonders what Laf looks like without Panarin. Can he carry a line? He shows brilliance, but anybody would benefit from playing with bread man. That’s what I’d expect from a $8MM player — if that’s what we will spend on him. Nothing wrong if he can’t, but then we should revisit that figure. How much, if at all, would his performance suffer if he played with other line mates or, better yet, to what extent would their production benefit from playing with him?
We’re not talking about a 50-60 point player. Regardless of line mates, he looks like a 70 point player, but I wonder if he can get to 90 without the Bread Man and whether he can turn 40 point guys into 55 point guys.
He can get to 90 with PP1 time. IMO with or without Bread.Off to a terrific start, but part of me wonders what Laf looks like without Panarin. Can he carry a line? He shows brilliance, but anybody would benefit from playing with bread man. That’s what I’d expect from a $8MM player — if that’s what we will spend on him. Nothing wrong if he can’t, but then we should revisit that figure. How much, if at all, would his performance suffer if he played with other line mates or, better yet, to what extent would their production benefit from playing with him?
We’re not talking about a 50-60 point player. Regardless of line mates, he looks like a 70 point player, but I wonder if he can get to 90 without the Bread Man and whether he can turn 40 point guys into 55 point guys.
I don't think he's Panarin level of "can boost his linemates" but he doesn't totally need to be...as much as we rag on Panarin sometimes he is one of the absolute top offensive players in the league, that's not easy to find even with a 1st overall pick. But I think Laf would be a first line player without Panarin assuming his other linemates are also skilled. I don't think you stick him with plugs and he makes that a first line though...he needs someone with creativity to play off as well.Off to a terrific start, but part of me wonders what Laf looks like without Panarin. Can he carry a line? He shows brilliance, but anybody would benefit from playing with bread man. That’s what I’d expect from a $8MM player — if that’s what we will spend on him. Nothing wrong if he can’t, but then we should revisit that figure. How much, if at all, would his performance suffer if he played with other line mates or, better yet, to what extent would their production benefit from playing with him?
We’re not talking about a 50-60 point player. Regardless of line mates, he looks like a 70 point player, but I wonder if he can get to 90 without the Bread Man and whether he can turn 40 point guys into 55 point guys.
i think he’ll pleasantly surprise everyone.I don't think he's Panarin level of "can boost his linemates" but he doesn't totally need to be...as much as we rag on Panarin sometimes he is one of the absolute top offensive players in the league, that's not easy to find even with a 1st overall pick. But I think Laf would be a first line player without Panarin assuming his other linemates are also skilled. I don't think you stick him with plugs and he makes that a first line though...he needs someone with creativity to play off as well.
re: your last sentence, i love the kid but that is some noncents. you're ignoring how good the league is and seeing thru blue colored glasses.i think he’ll pleasantly surprise everyone.
He’s very skilled and creates open space for himself now and also for others. He’s also physical, and forces turnovers with really good pressure. The more ice time he gets the better he’s gonna be.
He’s gonna require a player who can adapt to how he’s doing that but those aren’t too hard to find.
start giving him 20+ minutes a night and I wouldn’t be surprised if he was top 10 in scoring.
re: your last sentence, i love the kid but that is some noncents. you're ignoring how good the league is and seeing thru blue colored glasses.
mcD
drai
kuch
mackinnon
hughes
matthews
bread
jtm
pasta
raantanen
20 minutes a night puts him on pp1.re: your last sentence, i love the kid but that is some noncents. you're ignoring how good the league is and seeing thru blue colored glasses.
mcD
drai
kuch
mackinnon
hughes
matthews
bread
jtm
pasta
raantanen
20 minutes a night puts him on pp1.
He was drafted and the comparisons in talent level (pre-draft) were to
Mackinnon, Matthews
And I see the talent. He’s got an insane backhand (which is always hard for a goalie), he’s got crazy slick hands, he’s got great vision, he’s not afraid to shoot, he’s aggressive in front of the net.
His biggest issue is his lack of top end burst. Which he’s improved every year, and now backs defenders off when entering the zone.
And he’s only gonna get better as he gets faster / older.
y'all, read what i write instead of what the person in your head you want to argue against.
i specifically didn't say that he would never be a top 10 scorer, that that's outside the realm of possibility for his career. i'm aware of JT's progression, and Laf could absolutely follow a similar arc.
but i stand by this: even if you played him 20 minutes a game - this year - he probably wouldn't be top 10 in scoring.