When you say, "below standard at literally every aspect of what I outlined so much so that I genuinely wonder if you've watched any other team play," I have to wonder if you've seen other teams play and what standard you're referring to exactly. It surely isn't a standard involving all other teams.
That said, let’s look at this using other teams, in an overly simplistic but logical way, comparing him statistically to other LWs league-wide. In being overly simplistic, let’s say the top scoring 32 LWs are the line 1 LWs on the 32 teams league-wide and we’re kinda looking at this as line 1, 2, 3, and 4 LWs as follows:
- The top 32 scoring LWs avg 70 pts, ranging from 49-109 pts
- The 33-64 scoring LWs avg 38 pts, ranging from 29-48 pts
- The 65-96 scoring LWs avg 22 pts, ranging from 15-29 pts
- The 97-128 scoring LWs avg 10 pts, ranging from 4-15 pts
Lafreniere’s numbers fall squarely in the second group of 32, or second-liner territory at his position, and there are a lot of LWs a heck of a lot worse than he is. And where he stands league-wide at LW basically bears this second-line LW idea out:
- 69th in TOI/GP
- 63rd in PPG
- 46th in PTS
- 36th in ES PTS
How he progresses is anyone’s guess. But those numbers are not horrific for a guy who is 21 years old and still has room to grow.
I think folks tend to perhaps wrongly compare players against what top-tier players do, and probably also bundle wing scoring in with centers (center and wing are different beasts, and centers generally out-score wingers by a comfortable margin).
Again, this was an overly simplistic example, using only stats. But it at least adds perspective on a league-wide level. And does so on things that are measured and can be easily compared.