I'm surprise they traded for Carrier. Why trade for Him? When Dante Fabro could have been claimed for free? They are pretty much the same type of player with Dante being 2 years younger.
Last edited:
pick #62 ??? Hutson ???
A 5th - 6th defenceman, -14 on the worst NHL team this season... yikes
That's pretty terrible if you ask me...
This Carrier dude looks like a worst version of Josh Gorges
I like the idea of him becoming Guhle's partner this year and then maybe shifting down to play with Xhekaj as we hopefully add to the top 4 on the right.Pretty much. They're not bringing back Savard, so he's essentially Savard's replacement for the next 2 years. He plays a Sebastian Robidas / Mike Weaver type of game. He's a hard working, two-way guy with good defensive skills. He's a definite upgrade over Barron, Savard & Struble. He fits as a #4 with us at this time. His contract & term is perfect.
Justin Barron and Dante Fabbro are similar players. Carrier has similar counting stats but can actually defend.I'm surprise they traded for Carrier. Why trade for Him, when Dante Fabro could have been claimed for free? They are pretty much the same type of player with Dante being 2 years younger.
I actually hate the trade.
28 years old 5 foot 11 defenceman.
Potential reached at a 5 or 6th defenceman. -14 this year.
3.5 on the mass
Against a 23 years old 6 foot 2 defenceman. Did not play a lot this year. Looks like underacheiving but still really young d.
1.1 on the salary mass.
Seriously… this has the potentiel to backfire greatly.
I really don’t understand the move, it looks like for the first time Hughes lacked patience on that move.
Clown take.
He's our best RHS D-Men. That doesn't mean much you'll tell me, but he's a least someone that makes sense to use on a second pair - compared to Barron - and the size downgrade from Barron is irrelevant, as Barron was scared to be scared.
Call it what you want, we are just swapping out spare parts for more spare parts. I want up big upgrade on our blueline, I wonder if Kent has the means to pull it off? I love how when people have a different opinion its a 'Clown take' lol
You all went nuts when we got Dach, Newhook and a ton of you loved the Barron trade, all garbage. But this is the one we actually finally win , right? Can't get worse than Barron so Kent gets a win no matter what I suppose
We’ll see. Barron’s a big, fast skating RD with a great shot. When you make these kinds of trades, you’re taking a risk. I’d say it’s a good risk to take. And we also got the 2nd which we leveraged for Hage.Not mentioning that we should have kept Lehky though I don't see how he hurts us. Thing is Barron has a target wasn't a good one. And if you have to trade for Lehky, get 2 high picks instead.
That was not the trade though.In the trade of Lehks for Barron, etc this trade is a loss
With that said, Barron did not progress a bit which pro scouting/development gets a strike
In terms of current team, a vet stabilizing force was needed bad
Who’s that clown who wanted Barron for Lehkonen ? Should be bannedI know, hindsight is 20/20, it is fun though to re-read the first reactions to a trade sometimes...
This comment alone makes the trade a winIt's a 'mix now' move.
I still think his absolute upside is Patrice Brisebois (but he's well behind Brisebois at same age).Barron was Patrick Traverse 2.0
Just did not improve much if at all