Stability is good thing, but I like the fact that they can try different guys at different spots. Newhook could be on the top line with Nick and Cole. He can also go next to Dach. Anderson could also start next to Dach, but be put on a line with Nick and Cole at times. We know Dach on the wing with Nick and Cole worked. Newhook could be put at center at some point for a time. Monahan can be a center, but he can also be on the wing in the Top-6.
There are a lot of options available to MSL depending on the situation.
I think MSL will need togo with stability if he expects his ponies to take a step forward. Maybe that happens after some fiddling around at the start of the season, but, at some point, he needs to give his Cs steady wingers, barring injuries.
It will all depend on a few things:
How attached are the Habs to playing Newhook on the top-6 (where he'd have to play wing)?
How attached are the Habs to playing Dach at C at all cost all season long (why not wing again)?
Will a prospect shine at camp and force the team's hand to play in Montreal (Heineman, Roy)?
There are plenty of options, but the better ones are Dach and Monahan for the other wing when it comes to the Suzuki-Caufield duo.
That works in line with insisting on developing Dach at C from the get-go if Monahan play wing on the first line and Newhook slides down to be the third line's C. Shared TOI between the 2nd and 3rd line can keep the promise to give Newhook a better opportunity in Montreal.Playing with good wingers can also help:
Caufield - Suzuki - Monahan (Best option without Dach at RW)
Slafkovsky - Dach - Anderson (size, size and size - 6'3", 6'4", 6'3")
RHP - Newhook - Heineman (Show us what you can do, kid line)
Armia - Dvorak -Gallagher (Veteran 4th line)