Empoleon8771
Registered User
When did it come out that Formenton was involved in the 2018 WJC incident? I didn't remember seeing that.
Like Boston or Arizona? C'mon, man. No team is signing him if they think he was one of the 8 in the room.I think the only way Alex Formenton plays in the NHL is with a US team, he will be under heavy scrutiny in a canadian market.
.Wrong thread?Would a conditional pick in like 2025 work ?
Based on games played in 2024
after the 5 pm deadline today….any player signed must clear league wide waivers . He issue of QO doesn’t matter Other than retaining exclusive rights on a RFA. if they don’t issue the QO on RFAs they become UFAs. With the QO expiring, they still maintain exclusive rights.
thr bigger issue is…say they do sign him, then the league likely steps in and suspends him. Thrn Ottawa loses cap space unless they terminate the contract which then makes him a UFA. This is why the QO expires.
They got to round up these dogs prontoHave a feeling he's done for pro hockey in North America. Plus a few others are playing on borrowed time.
If the NHL doesn't step in and put the kybosh on a trade I'd offer up a 4th as a Sharks fan. He's play makes him worth more. But.....
He scored two goals and posted four points in seven games en route to winning gold with Canada at the 2018 world juniors.
Have a feeling he's done for pro hockey in North America. Plus a few others are playing on borrowed time.
Unless something concrete comes out as a result of the investigation, there's no way he's finished.
Virtanen was accused of far worse and he got a PTO. If he wasn't a terrible hockey player he'd be in the NHL right now.
And if he wasn't accused of anything, he'd still be in the NHL.
How was what Virtanen was accused of "far worse"?Unless something concrete comes out as a result of the investigation, there's no way he's finished.
Virtanen was accused of far worse and he got a PTO. If he wasn't a terrible hockey player he'd be in the NHL right now.
If there was no report, pretty sure a vast majority of the players on the team have made public comments saying they were not involved, so it leave the 7 that were involved… The best thing for these guy would be to face the justice because the court of public opinion is basically a life sentence…While there's plenty of speculation of who may be involved and everyone has an opinion. Not one report has linked a player to the incident that occurred beyond saying they were on the team. There has been no report on who was involved nor how they were involved.
No, probably not. He's an awful player.And if he wasn't accused of anything, he'd still be in the NHL.
No, probably not. He's an awful player.
Sens jus want to take off distraction out of the team.has Batherson been eliminated ? I recall a preseason interview where he states that he's participating in the investigation process but doesnt flat out deny anything akin to others earlier in the summer
At some point you only had 7 that had not denied involvement or made any comments… it may have changed since… I never say he was John Doe 1 but I just think it is fairly easy assume that he is one player involved… unofficial we I think everyone knows who is involved, I think we can deduct who it was with the info that is already out there. But the victim did settle so she most have sign a NDA and other stuff so this will linger for years.Saying 7 haven’t spoke would be incorrect though. All but one have made a statement. There’s 3 others who haven’t denied involvement from what I’ve gathered. The rest in one way or another deny involvement or any wrong doing. If that’s how you determine guilt or innocence you are left to over analyze carefully scripted statements.
Has there even been clarification on how many of those involved played on the team? It was originally reported that there was 8 men, some of whom or all played for team Canada. Has there been any clarification of the role those involved played? We know of John Doe 1 but did the all of the others participate in the sexual abuse? Maybe I missed some more recent reports, but I haven’t seen much clarification following the initial reporting. There’s been plenty of contradicting speculation from non-reputable sources along the way but not many answers from reputable ones. In one form or another there will be answers. I don’t see the need to have answers with so little information.
Why would there be fear of a lawsuit if what was being reported was factual? That's not to say the alleged incident didn't occur, I 100% believe it did, I've just seen too many reaching conclusions when there hasn't been enough information. It's why I intervened in the conversation, the conclusion that "Alex Formenton is almost assuredly John Doe 1" was based on nothing.