TheWanderer
Registered User
- Nov 15, 2013
- 4,959
- 32
Misunderstand the context in which "Edler has been the team's worst defenseman since the start of 11/12" is used? That's a cut and dry statement regardless of context.
Case in point.
Misunderstand the context in which "Edler has been the team's worst defenseman since the start of 11/12" is used? That's a cut and dry statement regardless of context.
Edler-Bieksa hasn't worked but to be fair Bieksa has looked mistake prone 90% of his time in the top 4. There's a reason why he's been slowly slipping down the RD depth chart the last 3 seasons.
Edler-Corrado looked decent in a very small sample size. Corrado looks like an AHL player (for now) so Edler had to carry him.
Edler-Diaz has looked solid in a small sample size. Diaz plays more of the ideal style Edler should be paired with. Most consider Diaz a decent #5 so Edler has been carrying him in a top 4 role.
Edler-Garrison hasn't looked good but Edler cannot play his off-side and Garrison really hasn't looked good as the RD unless paired with a bonafide top 30 Dman in Hamhuis or Campbell. For a very short stint Edler-Garrison did look good which is to be expected with 2 bonafide top 4 guys.
Edler-Rome was carried by Edler.
Edler-Tanev makes too much sense to be used by Sullivan.
Case in point.
You just made an excuse for Edler for every pair hasn't worked… congrats! Interesting that Hamhuis and Garrison have both had nice runs with Bieksa but Edler can't because Bieksa is "mistake prone 90% of the time". What does that make Edler? Mistake prone 99% of the time?
Edler has never carried a partner.
Edler did look much better last night imo, especially with the puck.
Did anyone think Edler had one of his worst games as a Canuck last night?
Who knows. I think that could be asked about a lot of the Canucks last night.
All I really have to say about Edler is that I hope he agrees to waive and allows the team to trade him.
My sentiments as well.
Trade Kesler and Edler this off season and let's get on with it. Our defence is pretty solid already and will be even without Edler. Get some young offensive players and draft picks back that can help the team long term.
This is just my opinion, but I think we could trade Edler for a real nice return and slide Corrado into the roster and not be any worse for it.
I agree with you. I've always been reluctant to trade Edler because I thought he could turn into this number one defenceman that we've seen glimpses of. At this point though I think what you see is what you get. A very good number two or so defenceman who is prone to mistakes. The one hole we'd have is someone for the powerplay but given how bad it's been this year I don't see how it can get much worse.
Shea Weber is currently -13. I think even the best defenseman struggle when their teams are so bad and can't score.
Edler has been utterly horrible this year. The team is better with him out of the lineup and it's a case of advanced stats lying.
Zero compete level, clueless defensively, absolutely bleeds odd-man rushes against.
If you want to get really pissed off, go back and watch his first shift of the 3rd period in the Dallas game. His compete level would be a joke in a beer league.
Edler should have been the player we were doing anything/everything to get rid of at the deadline, not Kesler.
Edler's +\- is so bad because he's out there with the Sedins, and the Sedins aren't doing jack **** offensively.