I never liked the Torts for AV trade. I never loved AV style of hockey. I am not one of these that believe that he is an absolute incompetent. His own arrogance in what he believes he drew up as SHOULD be working is his own worst enemy. That and I believe that at points and time, a team needs to bring the fight to the other team. That and standing up for your teammates. Both are big no-no's to AV. As such, the team adopted that persona. And you get what you get.The moment I became fully cognizant of his unhealthy appreciation of Tanner Glass meant I could no longer appreciate him as a coach.
I appreciate he was fired and I wish the best to his new team.
In fairness to Torts, the team that AV took to the Finals was MUCH more talented than any team that AV had.I appreciate he came in and saw this team had the talent to loosen the reigns a bit and focus on offense after Torts repeated insistence that the team wasn't talented enough to do anything except defend. I like the idea of working to create more high percentage scoring chances, and it's hard to not appreciate that he took this team to the first SCF in 2 decades and almost followed it up with another finals appearance.
He came in and succeeded for awhile and almost got the Rangers over the hump. For all the faults, those couple of years were pretty great.
Very good post. Thank you.He had to go because he was no longer the right coach for this team but I also feel he doesn't deserve the amount of hate he is getting. I don't care for the Cup or bust mentality. Under AV we won a Presidents Trophy, reached the Cup final. I have a lot of great memories of the Rangers under AV. Those Cup runs mean more to me than the 1994 cup win to be honest because I was 9, living in Europe and didn't watch the games live. These more recent runs I actually lived through. Stayed up until 5 am at times, fighting against the biological clock. Going to bed when the sun comes up, unable to sleep because of the adrenaline rush of beating the Penguins in game 7.
AV didn't win a cup with us but he will still be one of the most successful coaches in franchise history. Kreider, Zuccarello, Miller, Brassard, Hayes, Buchnevich, Fast, Skjei, Talbot, Raanta, Stepan all became better players under AV. He deserves credit for that. He deserves criticism for a lot of other things as well, don't get me wrong. But at the end of the day the Rangers had one of the most successful 5-year spans in franchise history (just waiting for someone to point out our franchise is **** and this doesn't mean anything because of that).
I have fond memories of the last 5 years, but I'm happy he's gone because we need a new direction.
Not speaking for anyone else, but I can honestly say that I have never liked the style of play that his teams seem to have. That is not kicking a dead horse. There were many AV cheerleaders. I can appreciate what he did, but again world beating goaltending covered up a lot of warts.13/14 and 14/15 were pretty exciting seasons, let's not deny it. Can't recall many people moaning about AV back then.. Now there's a queue to give the dead horse a final kick.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
It is far more than that. Roster moves are one thing, but being able to see the players for who they are and not who you want them to be is another. Most people's "systems" are adaptable.I will say one thing...we were fast before the Penguins and the rest of the league got fast. We just made bad roster moves that made us slower and drained our pool.
Bumping this as he made some very interesting comments recently regarding the perception that he is a coach that "ruined" younger players. In a league where coaches rarely say anything interesting I think it's great he's actually addressing a criticism that was definitely leveled at him by many people during his time here:
"Following practice Wednesday, Vigneault was asked about the Flyers’ youth taking immediate strides under his watch contradicting the can’t-coach-kids perception.https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelp...neault-make-his-own-list-young-players-flyers
'At some point, someone is going to give me a list of all those young players that I’ve screwed up — I’m not saying I’m perfect — but that have left my coaching and gone to somewhere else and become these incredible players. In [Vancouver], there were three players that [people] were on me constantly — none of them really turned out to be these amazing players.
In New York, I would really like to have that list. I know I’m not perfect and I never pretended to be, but I don’t know a lot of players that left our coaching, my coaching, and did go somewhere else and become these great players. I look at the Chris Kreiders, I look at the Derek Stepans, the Ryan McDonaghs, the Jesper Fasts, and I go on. All those guys when I got to New York, they were just the same as all these young guys. And they’re all turning out to be pretty good players.
Sometimes there’s a perception — sometimes it’s right, sometimes it’s wrong. For me, it’s no big deal. I’ve just got to go do my job.'"
Thoughts? Anyone want to give him the list he's looking for?
And when one doesn't want to believe the coach is any good, the exact opposite of this is seen in abundance.I don’t think AV ruined anyone but i do question the double standard where non-elite young player development is credited to coaches but non-elite young players that don’t succeed were never good and always destined to be bad
What is he talking about? All of those players had the pedigree and skill to be solid with our without him.
Woah woah woah.I don’t think AV ruined anyone but i do question the double standard where non-elite young player development is credited to coaches but non-elite young players that don’t succeed were never good and always destined to be bad
it’s just not very consistent from what i’ve seen