Been saying it for 3 years now. He sucks.
I do!So, after not being right for 2.75 years and being partially right now, do you feel vindicated for your heroic stance?
Congrats guys.I do!
![]()
Congrats guys.
Just to get a little ahead of the game, I am going to go on record now saying our next coach, whoever that is, sucks and needs to be fired.
Not being able to defend and leaving people wide open certainly helpsI still don`t understand how Vancouver had 55 SOG - Sedins are about to retire too.
It can`t only be AV defensive system.. ..cannot.))
He was right for the other 2.75 as well. AV's bacon was saved by goalie greatness.So, after not being right for 2.75 years and being partially right now, do you feel vindicated for your heroic stance?
It’s okay, not everyone is metaphorically literate enough to read the writing on the wall.So, after not being right for 2.75 years and being partially right now, do you feel vindicated for your heroic stance?
He was right for the other 2.75 as well. AV's bacon was saved by goalie greatness.
Anyone who didn't at least come to the conclusion that after the 2016 series vs the Pens that AV should have been fired is delusional. Before that you could validate him still being coach after an SCF and ECF run.
That should be the official 100% agreed upon expiration date for AV. He's at least been coach for, by season's end, 2 years too long.
I don't entirely agree with this. That 13-14 team was good. And one of the main reasons for that was it was before AV could really put his stamp on the squad. A lot of the players on that team were Torts holdovers. It's no surprise that the longer AV has been here, the worse the team has gotten. This year being somewhat of a remarkably impressive dumpster fire.3 years too long...honestly even the cup finals run was super smoke and mirrors.
I don't entirely agree with this. That 13-14 team was good. And one of the main reasons for that was it was before AV could really put his stamp on the squad. A lot of the players on that team were Torts holdovers. It's no surprise that the longer AV has been here, the worse the team has gotten. This year being somewhat of a remarkably impressive dumpster fire.
I would agree 100% SF. I don't see how the 13-14 team was a fluke run. We were the better team in every Eastern conference series, maybe even with the Penguins in the playoffs, and a top-3 team in the 2nd half of the regular season. Definitelythe best team during the Hank era we have had.I don't entirely agree with this. That 13-14 team was good. And one of the main reasons for that was it was before AV could really put his stamp on the squad. A lot of the players on that team were Torts holdovers. It's no surprise that the longer AV has been here, the worse the team has gotten. This year being somewhat of a remarkably impressive dumpster fire.
Maybe a more skilled team, but the 13-14 squad had the best underlying metrics of any AV team.The 14-15 team was better.
The roster has gone steadily downhill from there.
Maybe a more skilled team, but the 13-14 squad had the best underlying metrics of any AV team.
Maybe, maybe not. The 13-14 team got farther. That's what we know for fact.Back to the age old argument: which means more? Metrics or wins?
A healthy 2015 Rangers team has a better chance to win the Cup.
Maybe, maybe not. The 13-14 team got farther. That's what we know for fact.
Disagree. 14-15 is when the team started being one dimensional. That’s when the getting pinned in the dzone but scoring a ton of goals off the rush to bail them out started.13-14 team was healthier than 14-15. That’s it.
Disagree. 14-15 is when the team started being one dimensional. That’s when the getting pinned in the dzone but scoring a ton of goals off the rush to bail them out started.
13-14 was a machine. Also no Tanner Glass.