Value of: Adam Larsson

Dan403

Registered User
Apr 2, 2014
442
158
So we all knew that Chia was "over a barrel" when it came to acquiring a young D-man with potential and in the end he had to overpay.

That being said, if your team needed a young D-man and had traded for Larsson, what would have been an acceptable price for your team to pay?
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,568
14,091
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
So we all knew that Chia was "over a barrel" when it came to acquiring a young D-man with potential and in the end he had to overpay.

That being said, if your team needed a young D-man and had traded for Larsson, what would have been an acceptable price for your team to pay?

Taylor Hall. :laugh:
 

VoidCreature

Before you see the light, you must die.
Mar 6, 2015
6,933
4,309
New Jersey
Fair value was never going to get him out of NJ. That's what Ray Shero has said since the trade, it's what every Devils fan was saying before it.

They tried RNH and Eberle, I'm sure. RNH was taken high in the same draft as Larsson, I think he would have been "fair". But it wasn't a trade NJ would make. Larsson was too important.

Until Taylor Hall was on the table, we weren't going to do it. We won the trade, but we would never have made it if that hadn't been the case.

This is what teams mean when they say the player isn't available except for an overpayment.
 

1865

Alpha Couturier
Feb 28, 2005
16,938
5,738
Chester, UK
Fair value was never going to get him out of NJ. That's what Ray Shero has said since the trade, it's what every Devils fan was saying before it.

They tried RNH and Eberle, I'm sure. RNH was taken high in the same draft as Larsson, I think he would have been "fair". But it wasn't a trade NJ would make. Larsson was too important.

Until Taylor Hall was on the table, we weren't going to do it. We won the trade, but we would never have made it if that hadn't been the case.

This is what teams mean when they say the player isn't available except for an overpayment.

You've got to imagine another solid young D was available for less than the price paid?
 

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
Or a desperate hockey team.

I don't see it as Edmonton being desperate.

There are more LW available in the NHL than young RHD. So more of a supply vs demand scenario driving up the price of a RHD and lowering the price of a LW.

In a vacuum Hall>Larsson, but factoring supply and demand it becomes more equal
 

Alberta_OReilly_Fan

Bruin fan since 1975
Nov 26, 2006
14,331
3,941
Edmonton Canada
its like asking what is the value of a car. most people have a common agreement... then some say they would never pay that price.

and others might pay far more if they place a unique value upon the car.

as a seller you choose who to sell to... not based on the limitation of the common value and certainly not to disintested parties... but you seek out the best offer

and at the end of the day, thats your value

it only takes 1 single buyer in this whole world to establish the value of your car

thats reality
 

Addison Rae

Registered User
Jun 2, 2009
58,532
10,753
Vancouver
No one wants that melted butter dman near their 1st pairing. He's Brian Campbell soft

lmao, brian campbell is really, really good at hockey. Campbell was the best dman on a team that won his division, holy what an insult to Tanev, you surely got him there :laugh:
 

Roof Daddy

Registered User
Apr 1, 2008
13,201
2,387
Something considerably LESS than Tanev.

They are pretty similar defencemen, except Larsson has higher upside, is signed longer, is bigger, stronger and plays more physical, and had the better season last year. In what world is Tanev's value "considerably" higher? There isn't a team in the league that would take Tanev over Larsson.
 

Double Dion

Jets fan 28/06/2014
Feb 9, 2011
11,782
4,562
In terms of players? Hard to do that. Maybe Dougie Hamilton with an add on Edmonton's part. Certainly no where near what they paid for him.
 

TOGuy14

Registered User
Dec 30, 2010
12,068
3,579
Toronto
Leafs and Devils fans have had many a conversation around Kadri for Larsson with whichever side adding as necessary

I still think that's probably the most accurate 1 for 1 representation, or Toronto adds a small piece
 

Homesick

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
17,114
3,512
Calgary
lmao, brian campbell is really, really good at hockey. Campbell was the best dman on a team that won his division, holy what an insult to Tanev, you surely got him there :laugh:
You missed the point but its understandable.
 

Avsblitzkrieg

Registered User
May 1, 2016
1,579
0
Westminster
its like asking what is the value of a car. most people have a common agreement... then some say they would never pay that price.

and others might pay far more if they place a unique value upon the car.

as a seller you choose who to sell to... not based on the limitation of the common value and certainly not to disintested parties... but you seek out the best offer

and at the end of the day, thats your value

it only takes 1 single buyer in this whole world to establish the value of your car

thats reality
that's a fact. I don't understand why more people don't understamd this.
 

Rebuilt

Registered User
Jun 8, 2014
8,736
15
Tampa
They are pretty similar defencemen, except Larsson has higher upside, is signed longer, is bigger, stronger and plays more physical, and had the better season last year. In what world is Tanev's value "considerably" higher? There isn't a team in the league that would take Tanev over Larsson.

Hes also 3 years younger than Tanev on top of all that.
 

CornKicker

Holland is wrong..except all of the good things
Feb 18, 2005
12,154
3,622
the value is taylor hall + but Chiarelli bartered them down and taught Shero a thing or 2 about GMing
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad