Value of: Actual realistic offers for McDavid
- Thread starter Bjornar Moxnes
- Start date
- Status
Empoleon8771
Registered User
There are no "realistic" trade offers for McDavid if he's not getting traded.
- Feb 27, 2002
- 5,706
- 694
GIN ANTONIC
Registered User
I guess from the Canes it would be something like Slavin + Jarvis or Svech + Nikishin + 1st?
Maybe that's terrible for both sides. Trading for McDavid doesn't make any sense for anyone
Maybe that's terrible for both sides. Trading for McDavid doesn't make any sense for anyone
(looks at the calendar...looks at the thermometer ... scratches head)
Man, it's too early & cold for summer threads...
Man, it's too early & cold for summer threads...
If Gretzky could great traded, anyone could.
The deal has to start with a young generational player and add a lot on top.
So something like Celebrini, Smith, 1st '26, 1st '27
The deal has to start with a young generational player and add a lot on top.
So something like Celebrini, Smith, 1st '26, 1st '27
McDavid only gets traded if he asks for a trade.
If he asks for a trade, he's likely going to name his destination.
If he names his destination, it probably diminishes his trade value.
It's one of those situations where, you sound like a complete idiot saying you wouldn't trade for him, but the cost to trade for him would cripple your team.
If he asks for a trade, he's likely going to name his destination.
If he names his destination, it probably diminishes his trade value.
It's one of those situations where, you sound like a complete idiot saying you wouldn't trade for him, but the cost to trade for him would cripple your team.
Cats2TheCup
Registered User
Sasha Orlov
Lord of the Manor
- Jun 22, 2018
- 9,961
- 23,704
Gaylord Q Tinkledink
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2018
- 36,388
- 40,548
No one is trading a fair offer for him.
Edmonton, or any team trading a player of that ilk is automatically taking a loss, unless that player retires, falls off hard, or becomes regularly injured.
Edmonton, or any team trading a player of that ilk is automatically taking a loss, unless that player retires, falls off hard, or becomes regularly injured.
Rorschach
Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
Unless McDavid forces something, Edmonton only has two choices with McDavid:
1) Keep him
2) Rebuild
Only in the second situation is there a trade and it would be a trade for all futures and/or very young players. Now other teams could have more options if they had McDavid but Edmonton doesn't because while they have some players making contributions to the team, the team is driven by two players only.
So that rather rules out any hockey trade to be made while at the same time another team isn't going to have excess on ice talent they could dump to get McDavid...it would just make too many holes. In the Gretzky trade, the Kings gave up a ton of futures and a ton of cash...without that cash, the deal doesn't get done.
With the cap going up, there is a possibility for McDavid to be traded just for futures, the question is who has an entire team just needing a McDavid to get over the top and also has the futures to get it done. LA could do it and it would make sense (in the warped Kings FO sense) by including Byfield AND Clarke plus multiple firsts.
Not sure what other teams could.
1) Keep him
2) Rebuild
Only in the second situation is there a trade and it would be a trade for all futures and/or very young players. Now other teams could have more options if they had McDavid but Edmonton doesn't because while they have some players making contributions to the team, the team is driven by two players only.
So that rather rules out any hockey trade to be made while at the same time another team isn't going to have excess on ice talent they could dump to get McDavid...it would just make too many holes. In the Gretzky trade, the Kings gave up a ton of futures and a ton of cash...without that cash, the deal doesn't get done.
With the cap going up, there is a possibility for McDavid to be traded just for futures, the question is who has an entire team just needing a McDavid to get over the top and also has the futures to get it done. LA could do it and it would make sense (in the warped Kings FO sense) by including Byfield AND Clarke plus multiple firsts.
Not sure what other teams could.
Miroslav Satan had essentially the same eyebrows.
Based on the return Gretzky got, I don't think a 28 year old, expiring contract McDavid will fetch Celebrini, Smith, etc. Realistically, whatever Edmonton would get in return would be a massive let down to Oilers fans. I'd assume, a top prospect, couple of firsts and a quality roster player
- Oct 31, 2007
- 19,456
- 20,794
Not a good argument in my opinion.
Gretzky had already won four Cups in Edmonton. Let's just say that Edmonton was a touch less hungry in 1988 than they are today -- meaning they could tolerate accepting futures and money.
Gretzky had a supporting cast in 1980's that was a HHOF who's who. Not the same situation with Connor McDavid in Edmonton today. Losing McDavid would decimate Oilers -- hence the need to get a return that would in turn decimate any team trading for him.
Edmonton got $15M cash as part of the deal. Not sure that would be finagled today.
Connor McDavid for all practical purposes is untradeable at present.
McHelpus
Registered User
- Jan 16, 2021
- 3,073
- 4,361
Most Oilers fan won’t ever agree to a trade for McDavid.
I would. It would start with a top tier goalie, a top pairing defenseman and a 2 line Centre . Picks to balance it out. Probably have to include Nurse with retention to make money work. The question is what would have to be retained on Nurse to make the deal with it with out depreciating the asset that McDavid is
I would. It would start with a top tier goalie, a top pairing defenseman and a 2 line Centre . Picks to balance it out. Probably have to include Nurse with retention to make money work. The question is what would have to be retained on Nurse to make the deal with it with out depreciating the asset that McDavid is
LTIR
Registered User
- Nov 8, 2013
- 28,173
- 15,383
McDavid+Nurse
For
Dahlin+Peterka+Cozens+1st
McD goes very close to home without the media buzz. BUF finally becomes good.
Oilers get 2C , 1D and a winger for Drai in return while opening some cap space. A magic ball also included to trade or draft.
IWantSakicAsMyGM
Registered User
The only way trading McDavid makes sense for the Oilers is if he refuses to sign an extension or demands a trade. In the unlikely event that this happens, every team in the league would likely be calling to ask what it'll take. In a truly open market, the bidding war would be epic.
But, McDavid has a NMC that he'd need to waive for any trade to happen, so he could plausibly only have 1 or 2 destinations in mind. In that situation, Edmonton would need to decide between taking the best offer they can get from a couple of teams or letting him walk in UFA, and the return could realistically be pennies on the dollar compared to his actual value.
But, McDavid has a NMC that he'd need to waive for any trade to happen, so he could plausibly only have 1 or 2 destinations in mind. In that situation, Edmonton would need to decide between taking the best offer they can get from a couple of teams or letting him walk in UFA, and the return could realistically be pennies on the dollar compared to his actual value.
PelagicJoe
Registered User
Matthews and possibly a mid to low round pick or B/C prospect for McDavid is the only realistic one I can think of.
Sasha Orlov
Lord of the Manor
- Jun 22, 2018
- 9,961
- 23,704
Lmao sure buddy
28 year old unsigned McDavid wouldn’t even get that package realistically
- Oct 9, 2012
- 34,833
- 34,247
You’ll never get a “realistic” trade offer for McDavid. He provides too much income through being on a team to put a true value on that. Katz isn’t going to trade away his golden ticket and watch his franchise valuation go down.
- Status
