Doggy
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2011
- 3,887
- 3,013
I actually think this could be an ongoing thread for Q&A to help those of us who don't understand all of it...
I was talking with a Habs fan about Laine and he was gloating about how good he has been and I had remarked that I had heard he was a power play beast but really poor at even strength. He said no, that Laine had been really good at even strength.
So I was looking at PuckPedia today and realized they offer up some advanced metrics and so I glanced at Laine's page. I think it confirms what I was stating but I am not really sure. Was wondering if someone could clarify what I am looking at. The link is: https://puckpedia.com/player/patrik-laine
GF% (35.7): I assume this means that at even strength (5v5, 4v4 and 3v3), when Laine is on the ice the Habs score 35.7% of the goals and the opponent scores 64.3% of the goals?
DFF% (39.10): I know I am going to word this wrong but I think I understand. Without going into the metrics of how they determine the danger-osity of a shot, this tells me when Laine is on the ice the Habs get 39.1% of the danger-osity and the opponent gets 60.9% of the danger-osity? Seems like this should track similar to the xGF%. I think I just like saying danger-osity
Relative DFF% (-12.6): Does this tell me that when Laine is on the ice the Habs DFF% is 39.1% and when he is not on the ice the Habs DFF% is 51.7% (Laine's DFF% + 12.6%)?
CF% (40.10): Corsi I get, that's like Advanced Metrics 101. When Laine is on the ice, the Habs take 40.1% of the shots and the opponent 59.9% of the shots. Does this include power play time? If it does, then that would make his even strength numbers even shittier than they already are.
Relative CF% (-11.4): I assume this tracks like Relative DFF%. When Laine is on the ice the Habs CF% is 40.10 so when Laine is not on the ice their CF% is 51.5%?
Are G/60 and P/60 only even strength? Because he has eight goals this season but his G/60 is blank. I assume that means he has 8 PP goals and not a single goal at even strength.
I was talking with a Habs fan about Laine and he was gloating about how good he has been and I had remarked that I had heard he was a power play beast but really poor at even strength. He said no, that Laine had been really good at even strength.
So I was looking at PuckPedia today and realized they offer up some advanced metrics and so I glanced at Laine's page. I think it confirms what I was stating but I am not really sure. Was wondering if someone could clarify what I am looking at. The link is: https://puckpedia.com/player/patrik-laine
GF% (35.7): I assume this means that at even strength (5v5, 4v4 and 3v3), when Laine is on the ice the Habs score 35.7% of the goals and the opponent scores 64.3% of the goals?
DFF% (39.10): I know I am going to word this wrong but I think I understand. Without going into the metrics of how they determine the danger-osity of a shot, this tells me when Laine is on the ice the Habs get 39.1% of the danger-osity and the opponent gets 60.9% of the danger-osity? Seems like this should track similar to the xGF%. I think I just like saying danger-osity
Relative DFF% (-12.6): Does this tell me that when Laine is on the ice the Habs DFF% is 39.1% and when he is not on the ice the Habs DFF% is 51.7% (Laine's DFF% + 12.6%)?
CF% (40.10): Corsi I get, that's like Advanced Metrics 101. When Laine is on the ice, the Habs take 40.1% of the shots and the opponent 59.9% of the shots. Does this include power play time? If it does, then that would make his even strength numbers even shittier than they already are.
Relative CF% (-11.4): I assume this tracks like Relative DFF%. When Laine is on the ice the Habs CF% is 40.10 so when Laine is not on the ice their CF% is 51.5%?
Are G/60 and P/60 only even strength? Because he has eight goals this season but his G/60 is blank. I assume that means he has 8 PP goals and not a single goal at even strength.
