LeftWingLocked
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2018
- 492
- 453
And what about other costs? Property taxes? Federal income tax rates between Canada/US? Provincial/State sales tax? And what about cost of living? Should New York get a break because the cost of living in Manhattan is significantly more than living in Phoenix?Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".
Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.
Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.
Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?
How about Dallas and Nashville then?Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".
Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.
Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.
Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?
And making citizens pay a greater share of taxes because companies who funnel money out of tax coffers and to the top 1% in an elitist corporate welfare scheme (yes the gift of corporate loopholes is a form of welfare) is so much better?Good for Delaware. Keeping more money out of the hands of politicians that cry "think of the children" when they really want to line their own pockets is a good thing.
Much easier said than done.Every region has it's draws, if you don't like it vote your politicians out of office
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".
Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.
Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.
Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?
And the Rangers and Kings have an advantage over the rest of the teams in the league because they attract the most free agents. Let’s do something about that too.
You forgot the Stars there. I am sure this has been discussed at length but it's not as big a deal as fans make it out to be.
First off: Players pay state income tax on a game by game basis. The state income tax advantage for a Dallas Stars player only applies to:
41 home games
2 games in Florida (TBL & FLA)
1 game in Nevada (VEG)
1 game in Washington (SEA)
The players still pay income tax for the remaining 37 games, and federal income tax for all of those games. The avg state income tax is roughly 10%. If we take that as a number of comparison:
Dallas Stars player: 45 tax-free games
Arizona Coyotes player: 7 tax-free games
The difference? 38 taxed games out of 82 which is 45% of games. So realistically, a player would only lose 4.5% of his base salary to the state income tax advantage.*
It's an advantage, but not a huge one. And why should the NHL change their rules for this? They didn't create the tax system.
Tampa isn't winning back-to-back Cups because of a favourable tax situation. They are winning because they developed players the right way in Syracuse, turning 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th round piicks into top-6 contributors.
*Of course the actual numbers are a bit more nuanced, but just to explain the taxes, they're not a flat fee based on where the team is located.
50% of players salary
But if majority is paid in signing bonus it's a huge win for the player with no State income tax
50% of players salary
But if majority is paid in signing bonus it's a huge win for the player with no State income tax
Man there must be a tissue shortage up North with all these Canadian tears.
What a great way to show off your surface-level intelligence of taxes and the salary cap. OP has zero mention of…
-sales tax
-property tax
-cost of living
-tax loopholes available to athletes
-revenue disparities between teams
-free agency attraction based quality of life in different cities
…to name a few. Nope just straight up “these teams don’t pay income taxes and it’s unfair!” Very detailed and nuanced understanding of the situation.
I honestly look forward to Tampa knocking a Canadian team out of the Finals just for people who whine about this incessantly. We’ve been bickering about this for years, fellas. There are MANY factors that go into roster construction. Income taxes are a small factor among many and it would be impossible to regulate between 2 countries and what…25 different states/provinces.
Deal with it, brah
Toronto has the most money for facilities and player development, let's do something about that.
That's because the state leaders can think two steps ahead and have a "rainy day fund" where they sock away money during good times to cover revenue shortfalls during down times.Especially when talking about Florida which doesn't need an income tax because they make so much money from tourism. Even with their disaster spending from hurricanes, the state always had a surplus.