You mean inject common sense.
They don't want Reinhart tasked with trying to fix things. That posters still do not grasp this is amazing. In that context there is nothing shocking about the moves being made. But everyone wants to see the kids including me. But I get why they doing what they are doing with Reinhart.
Getting mad that they are not putting it on Reinhart to fix things is misguided IMO. They are being overly protective.
I get what you're saying re: "fix things", though really only because you have earlier/elsewhere much more aptly paraphrased Nolan's claimed rationalizations. (shoulda been a sticky, remember?
)
Why do you keep putting it like that, as if anyone expects him to "fix things"?. Pray tell me what the hell you or anyone envisions being "fixed". It has nothing to do with fixing anything, it has to do with top prospect Sam Reinhart playing with at least one actual offensive player and getting power play time, like basically every other high-end prospect in the history of ever. Send him to juniors otherwise. Sam Reinhart isn't being protected playing on a 4th line with talentless linemates. How does going up against other 4th liners protect him? How does not giving him the chance to touch the puck on the 2nd PP unit protect him?
But even with getting the whole argument given by Nolan (and explained here so often already), I'm starting to think it was an empty rationalization after all. Mostly because after this long stretch of nothingless in the so-called top 6, there's just no way Reinhart could be plugged in, do poorly, and have it end up somehow screwing his development.
It couldn't possibly knock his confidence that he'd failed where the ENTIRE rest of the team had also been failing, miserably, game after game, and it's not like his physical development puts him behind the 8 ball when we're watching Ennis and Gionta flip-flopping onto the ice every other shift.
I *do* get plugging Reinhart in on the 4th rather than the 3rd, if the 3rd is intended to be more shutdown/checking in drive. But if they're going to take Hodgson out of center and leave Ennis' worse faceoffs and defensive game in, then there's gotta be room for Reinhart in the top 6 mix.
Really, all Nolan's own flip-flopping re: Hodgson at center, without once just realizing that Ennis is the weaker link, and now trying to shove Foligno in as a 2C... Well, I'm reviewing his rationalizations over Reinhart now too.
Crazy.