Fjordy
Soul Dancing in the Dark
- Jun 20, 2018
- 19,650
- 10,932
I just hope it works, otherwise they could have gotten someone more influential with that pick.He hits more and PKs more.
I just hope it works, otherwise they could have gotten someone more influential with that pick.He hits more and PKs more.
Agree, we have different views of the player. I have no problem with him being on the team. My problem lies in the asset management to acquire him.We obviously have a different view of the player, as I think he is an upgrade on several of our bottom six players. Don’t be shocked if he is better than greenway this year
FWIW evolving hockey has him with positive goals above replacement, negative xgoals above replacement.
I was kind of thinking he could be in that Gaustad mold. Not a natural center who can win faceoffs like Goose, but he does all those things we used to lean heavily on Goose to provide.So he kind of sounds like a player the sabres traded a few years back.... Marcus Foligno but without the name recognition and NHL experience
Well we missed the playoffs every year we had Larsson, so replacing him with another Larsson doesn’t get me very excited. I suppose he’s fine but need some needle-movers on this team.A line that gets ridiculous d-zone use was what happened with the Girgensons-Larsson-Okposo line and I would bet that looking at this, people who hated Larsson are also going to come down hard on hating Malenstyn.
But Jeannot trade... IdkADAMS REFUSES TO OVERPAY AND LOSE TRADES!
ADAMS OVERPAID!
Make up your minds.
No, but a lot of people with "Sabres" in their usernames areAre Adams and Pegula arguing who can drive the ball 50 yards?
It sounds like we could have just resigned Girgensons.FWIW evolving hockey has him with positive goals above replacement, negative xgoals above replacement.
His on-ice shot/chance stats were pretty bad, but goals weren't terrible. Either he did his job well, or got lucky more pucks didn't find the back of the net. I guess we'll find out.
THISAgree, we have different views of the player. I have no problem with him being on the team. My problem lies in the asset management to acquire him.
Well we missed the playoffs every year we had Larsson, so replacing him with another Larsson doesn’t get me very excited.
Yup. And already know it’s a terrible trade despite having no clue who the player even is. But hey, they saw a chart! lol It’s comical.A lot of people going "who?" and then mad about it.
Probably a better comparisonI was kind of thinking he could be in that Gaustad mold. Not a natural center who can win faceoffs like Goose, but he does all those things we used to lean heavily on Goose to provide.
“We can’t defend in our own zone with our forward core”
“We don’t have any grit, we need to draft guys, even if they top out at bottom 6 forwards”
“We don’t have size in the lineup”
“If adams doesn’t trade one of our first three picks it’s a failure”
Adams trades a second for a fourth line player who hits, speed, great defense, pks, with some offensive upside - “adams is a joke he is stupid this team sucks”
Four year olds around here upset when their parents bring them the pb&j they want but now they dknt want it so they throw a fit
This has been explained an exhausting amount of times, butADAMS REFUSES TO OVERPAY AND LOSE TRADES!
ADAMS OVERPAID!
Make up your minds.
THIS
#43 just more we could have spent this asset on acquiring a 3C or top 9 forward or top 6 forward (with ++ of course)
So he kind of sounds like a player the sabres traded a few years back.... Marcus Foligno but without the name recognition and NHL experience
Because this team is so bad at drafting and developing, that the last time we successfully developed this type of role player, he got to stay on the team FOREVER and we still can’t rid ourselves of him.My kneejerk reaction is that I hate this trade, why is Adams just throwing a 2nd round pick at a 4th line replacement level player.